Jian-Ping Chu

Dr. Jian-Ping Chu


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
9 November 2018 in Journal of Neuro-Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JZJing Zhao
Jing Zhao
YWYu-Liang Wang
Yu-Liang Wang
XLXin-Bei Li
Xin-Bei Li
MHMan-Shi Hu
Man-Shi Hu
ZLZhu-Hao Li
Zhu-Hao Li
JCJian-Ping Chu
Jian-Ping Chu

17 June 2008 in CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JLJia-Ping Li
Jia-Ping Li
JCJian-Ping Chu
Jian-Ping Chu
JYJian-Yong Yang
Jian-Yong Yang
WCWei Chen
Wei Chen
YWYu Wang
Yu Wang
YHYong-Hui Huang
Yong-Hui Huang

19 March 2020 in European Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JZJing Zhao
Jing Zhao
YHYingqian Huang
Yingqian Huang
YSYukun Song
Yukun Song
DXDingxiang Xie
Dingxiang Xie
MHManshi Hu
Manshi Hu
JCJian-Ping Chu
Jian-Ping Chu

28 February 2019 in Movement Disorders
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LZLin Zou
Lin Zou
YSYukun Song
Yukun Song
XZXiangxue Zhou
Xiangxue Zhou
JCJian-Ping Chu
Jian-Ping Chu
XTXiaoying Tang
Xiaoying Tang

18 September 2015 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JZJing Zhao
Jing Zhao
ZYZhi-Yun Yang
Zhi-Yun Yang
BLBo-Ning Luo
Bo-Ning Luo
JYJian-Yong Yang
Jian-Yong Yang
JCJian-Ping Chu
Jian-Ping Chu
To quantitatively evaluate the diagnostic efficiency of parameters from diffusion and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR which based on tumor parenchyma (TP) and peritumoral (PT) area in classification of brain tumors. 45 patients (male: 23, female: 22; mean age: 46 y) were prospectively recruited and they underwent conventional, DCE-MR and DWI examination. With each tumor, 10–15 regions of interest (ROIs) were manually placed on TP and PT area. ADC and permeability parameters (Ktrans, Ve, Kep and iAUC) were calculated and their diagnostic efficiency was assessed. In TP, all permeability parameters and ADC value could significantly discriminate Low- from High grade gliomas (HGG) (p<0.001); among theses parameters, Ve demonstrated the highest diagnostic power (iAUC: 0.79, cut-off point: 0.15); the most sensitive and specific index for gliomas grading were Ktrans (84%) and Kep (89%). While, in PT area, only Ktrans could help in gliomas grading (P = 0.009, cut-off point: 0.03 min-1). Moreover, in TP, mean Ve and iAUC of primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) and metastases were significantly higher than that in HGG (p<0.003). Further, in PT area, mean Ktrans (p≤0.004) could discriminate PCNSL from HGG and ADC (p≤0.003) could differentiate metastases with HGG. Quantitative ADC and permeability parameters from Diffusion and DCE-MR in TP and PT area, especially DCE-MR, can aid in gliomas grading and brain tumors discrimination. Their combined application is strongly recommended in the differential diagnosis of these tumor entities.

1 November 2005 in Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
WCWei Chen
Wei Chen
JCJian-Ping Chu
Jian-Ping Chu
JYJian-Yong Yang
Jian-Yong Yang
HLHe-Ping Li
He-Ping Li
WZWen-Quan Zhuang
Wen-Quan Zhuang
WGWen-Bo Guo
Wen-Bo Guo