Jiyin Liu

Prof. Jiyin Liu

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

36Years (1991-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2003 in Transportation Research Part B: Methodological
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CZChuqian Zhang
Chuqian Zhang
JLJiyin Liu
Jiyin Liu
YWYat-Wah Wan
Yat-Wah Wan
KMKatta G Murty
Katta G Murty
RLRichard J Linn
Richard J Linn

30 September 2014 in IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
LTLixin Tang
Lixin Tang
YDYun Dong
Yun Dong
JLJiyin Liu
Jiyin Liu
Differential evolution (DE) is a well-known optimization algorithm that utilizes the difference of positions between individuals to perturb base vectors and thus generate new mutant individuals. However, the difference between the fitness values of individuals, which may be helpful to improve the performance of the algorithm, has not been used to tune parameters and choose mutation strategies. In this paper, we propose a novel variant of DE with an individual-dependent mechanism that includes an individual-dependent parameter (IDP) setting and an individual-dependent mutation (IDM) strategy. In the IDP setting, control parameters are set for individuals according to the differences in their fitness values. In the IDM strategy, four mutation operators with different searching characteristics are assigned to the superior and inferior individuals, respectively, at different stages of the evolution process. The performance of the proposed algorithm is then extensively evaluated on a suite of the 28 latest benchmark functions developed for the 2013 Congress on Evolutionary Computation special session. Experimental results demonstrate the algorithm's outstanding performance.

1 August 2001 in European Journal of Operational Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LTLixin Tang
Lixin Tang
JLJiyin Liu
Jiyin Liu
ARAiying Rong
Aiying Rong
ZYZihou Yang
Zihou Yang

1 July 2000 in European Journal of Operational Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LTLixin Tang
Lixin Tang
JLJiyin Liu
Jiyin Liu
ARAiying Rong
Aiying Rong
ZYZihou Yang
Zihou Yang

7 March 2013 in IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LTLixin Tang
Lixin Tang
YZYue Zhao
Yue Zhao
JLJiyin Liu
Jiyin Liu
This paper studies a challenging problem of dynamic scheduling in steelmaking-continuous casting (SCC) production. The problem is to re-optimize the assignment, sequencing, and timetable of a set of existing and new jobs among various production stages for the new environment when unforeseen changes occur in the production system. We model the problem considering the constraints of the practical technological requirements and the dynamic nature. To solve the SCC scheduling problem, we propose an improved differential evolution (DE) algorithm with a real-coded matrix representation for each individual of the population, a two-step method for generating the initial population, and a new mutation strategy. To further improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the solution process for dynamic use, an incremental mechanism is proposed to generate a new initial population for the DE whenever a real-time event arises, based on the final population in the last DE solution process. Computational experiments on randomly generated instances and the practical production data show that the proposed improved algorithm can obtain better solutions compared to other algorithms.

1 January 1993 in International Journal of Production Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BMB. L. Maccarthy
B. L. Maccarthy
JLJiyin Liu
Jiyin Liu
This paper considers the gap between scheduling theory and scheduling practice. The development and the main results of classical scheduling theory are reviewed and presented in an easily accessible way. Recent trends in scheduling research which attempt to make it more relevant and applicable are described. The nature of the gap between theory and practice is discussed. The failure of classical scheduling theory to address the total environment within which the scheduling function operates is noted. However, scheduling research in operations management and manufacturing systems tends to ignore the rich vein of methods, techniques and results in the classical theory. The need for an integrated scheduling research effort, containing elements of both approaches, is stressed.