Bernard Ng

Dr. Bernard Ng


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2021 in Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
OGOlivia M de Goede
Olivia M de Goede
DNDaniel C Nachun
Daniel C Nachun
NFNicole M Ferraro
Nicole M Ferraro
MGMichael J Gloudemans
Michael J Gloudemans
ARAbhiram S Rao
Abhiram S Rao
SMStephen B Montgomery
Stephen B Montgomery

21 March 2024 in Nature Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MFMasashi Fujita
Masashi Fujita
ZGZongmei Gao
Zongmei Gao
LZLu Zeng
Lu Zeng
CMCristin McCabe
Cristin McCabe
CWCharles C. White
Charles C. White
PJPhilip L. De Jager
Philip L. De Jager

30 November 2023 in Nature Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ASAlexander Sasse
Alexander Sasse
BNBernard Ng
Bernard Ng
ASAnna E. Spiro
Anna E. Spiro
STShinya Tasaki
Shinya Tasaki
DBDavid A. Bennett
David A. Bennett
SMSara Mostafavi
Sara Mostafavi

25 September 2020 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AMAlexandra Maslova
Alexandra Maslova
RRRicardo N. Ramirez
Ricardo N. Ramirez
KMKe Ma
Ke Ma
HSHugo Schmutz
Hugo Schmutz
CWChendi Wang
Chendi Wang
IPImmunological Genome Project
Immunological Genome Project
Significance: Applying artificial intelligence tools to a highly complex question of immunology, we show that a deep neural network can learn to predict the patterns of chromatin opening across 81 stem and differentiated cells across the immune system, solely from the DNA sequence of regulatory regions. It does so by discovering ab initio the binding motifs for known master regulators, along with some unknown ones, and their combinatorial operation. These predictions validated biochemically, and a mouse-trained neural network predicts human enhancer/promoter activity much better than sequence comparisons would. Beyond serving as a trove of testable functional frameworks, this work is important in showing how massively complex integrated questions of immunology can be handled with such tools.

17 August 2020 in PLOS Computational Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EPEllis Patrick
Ellis Patrick
MTMariko Taga
Mariko Taga
AEAyla Ergun
Ayla Ergun
BNBernard Ng
Bernard Ng
WCWilliam Casazza
William Casazza
SMSara Mostafavi
Sara Mostafavi
Complexity of cell-type composition has created much skepticism surrounding the interpretation of bulk tissue transcriptomic studies. Recent studies have shown that deconvolution algorithms can be applied to computationally estimate cell-type proportions from gene expression data of bulk blood samples, but their performance when applied to brain tissue is unclear. Here, we have generated an immunohistochemistry (IHC) dataset for five major cell-types from brain tissue of 70 individuals, who also have bulk cortical gene expression data. With the IHC data as the benchmark, this resource enables quantitative assessment of deconvolution algorithms for brain tissue. We apply existing deconvolution algorithms to brain tissue by using marker sets derived from human brain single cell and cell-sorted RNA-seq data. We show that these algorithms can indeed produce informative estimates of constituent cell-type proportions. In fact, neuronal subpopulation can also be estimated from bulk brain tissue samples. Further, we show that including the cell-type proportion estimates as confounding factors is important for reducing false associations between Alzheimer’s disease phenotypes and gene expression. Lastly, we demonstrate that using more accurate marker sets can substantially improve statistical power in detecting cell-type specific expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs). Gene expression data generated from a tissue sample reflects an average gene expression profile across heterogeneous populations of cells. Because composition of constituent cell-types can vary across individuals (due to technical or biological factors), differential gene expression analysis requires estimating and adjusting for such cellular heterogeneity. While many deconvolution algorithms for estimating cellular composition from tissue gene expression data have been tested extensively in blood, their performance when applied to brain tissue is unclear. To address this gap, we generated an immunohistochemistry (IHC) dataset for five major cell-types from brain, in order to apply and then assess deconvolution algorithms for application to brain gene expression datasets. We show that these algorithms can indeed produce informative estimates of constituent cell-type proportions. Further, we show that adjusting for estimated cell-type proportions across individuals when conducting differential gene expression analysis is important in reducing false associations.

31 October 2024 in Nature Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BNBernard Ng
Bernard Ng
STShinya Tasaki
Shinya Tasaki
KGKelsey M. Greathouse
Kelsey M. Greathouse
CWCourtney K. Walker
Courtney K. Walker
AZAda Zhang
Ada Zhang
JHJeremy H. Herskowitz
Jeremy H. Herskowitz
Brain connectivity arises from interactions across biophysical scales, ranging from molecular to cellular to anatomical to network level. To date, there has been little progress toward integrated analysis across these scales. To bridge this gap, from a unique cohort of 98 individuals, we collected antemortem neuroimaging and genetic data, as well as postmortem dendritic spine morphometric, proteomic and gene expression data from the superior frontal and inferior temporal gyri. Through the integration of the molecular and dendritic spine morphology data, we identified hundreds of proteins that explain interindividual differences in functional connectivity and structural covariation. These proteins are enriched for synaptic structures and functions, energy metabolism and RNA processing. By integrating data at the genetic, molecular, subcellular and tissue levels, we link specific biochemical changes at synapses to connectivity between brain regions. These results demonstrate the feasibility of integrating data from vastly different biophysical scales to provide a more comprehensive understanding of brain connectivity.