Sara Fiona Elisabeth BELL

Ms. Sara Fiona Elisabeth BELL

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
17 January 2020 in Sexual Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SBSteven G Badman
Steven G Badman
SBSara Fiona Elisabeth BELL
Sara Fiona Elisabeth BELL
JDJudith A. Dean
Judith A. Dean
JLJime Lemoire
Jime Lemoire
LCLuke Coffey
Luke Coffey
DWDavid M. Whiley
David M. Whiley
Background: The aim of this study was to compare the performance of pooled self-collected urogenital, pharyngeal and anorectal specimens to that of individual specimen results for the molecular detection of Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) near the point of care (POC) for diagnostic sensitivity. Methods: Clients (mostly men who have sex with men) attending an urban community testing service and three sex-on-premises venues in Brisbane, Australia, were offered CT and NG testing by trained lay providers. Participants provided three self-collected specimens (urine, pharyngeal and rectal) for testing by GeneXpert (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). If any of the individual specimens from a participant were positive, all three specimens were pooled and retested. Results: Of the 388 participants who provided three individual anatomical specimens, 76 (19.6%) were found to be positive for CT and/or NG at one or more sites. The pooling approach failed to detect five CT rectal and four NG pharyngeal infections. The overall performance (sensitivity) of the pooling approach compared with individual specimen testing and Cohen’s κ were 90.0% and 0.86 respectively for CT and 89.7% and 0.89 respectively for NG. Conclusions: Reduced sensitivity was observed when using pooled specimens for the detection of CT and NG using GeneXpert near the POC, similar to results reported in laboratory-based CT and NG pooling studies. These data suggest specimen pooling is feasible near to the POC, potentially saving time and costs when screening at-risk populations for CT and NG. Our data also suggest a reduction in pooled urine could improve overall test sensitivity.

SBSara Fiona Elisabeth BELL
Sara Fiona Elisabeth BELL
JLJime Lemoire
Jime Lemoire
JDJoseph Debattista
Joseph Debattista
ARAndrew Redmond
Andrew Redmond
GDGlen Driver
Glen Driver
JDJudith Ann Dean
Judith Ann Dean
HIV self-testing (HIVST) introduces opportunities for screening in non-conventional settings, and addresses known testing barriers. This study involved the development and evaluation of a free online HIVST dissemination service hosted by a peer-led, community-based organisation with on-site, peer-facilitated HIV testing, and established referral and support programs for people newly diagnosed with HIV to determine whether this model was feasible and acceptable for engaging MSM, particularly among infrequent and naive HIV-testers, or those living in remote and rural areas. Between December 2016 and April 2018, 927 kits were ordered by 794 individuals, the majority of whom were men who have sex with men (MSM) (62%; 494), having condomless sex (50%; 392), or living outside a major city (38%; 305). Very few (5%; 39) sought the available pre-test peer contact, despite 45% (353) being naive HIV-testers. This study demonstrates that online HIVST dissemination is acceptable and feasible for engaging at-risk suboptimal testers, including those unwilling to test elsewhere (19%; 47/225). With half (50%; 403) unwilling to buy a kit, our study suggests that HIVST will need to be subsidized (cost-neutral to users) to enhance population coverage and access.

2 March 2024 in Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SWSarah Warzywoda
Sarah Warzywoda
ADAmalie Dyda
Amalie Dyda
LFLisa Fitzgerald
Lisa Fitzgerald
AMAmy Mullens
Amy Mullens
JDJoseph Debattista
Joseph Debattista
JDJudith A. Dean
Judith A. Dean
University creates unique social environments for many young people that can result in behaviour changes that can impact sexual health-related risks and facilitate transmission of HIV. Little is known about HIV knowledge, risk, and awareness of pre-exposure prophylaxis/post-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP/PEP) among Australian university students. A 2019 online survey distributed through Queensland universities, using active recruitment/snowball sampling. Descriptive and logistical regression analysis investigated HIV knowledge/risk and PrEP/PEP awareness. Of the 4,291 responses, 60.4% were 20-29 years old, 57.0% identified as heterosexual, and 31.8% were born-overseas. Mean HIV knowledge score was 9.8/12. HIV risk scores were higher among men-who-have-sex-with-men (MSM) (mean=5.2/40) compared to all other sexual behaviours (mean=3.1/40). Logistic regression indicated PrEP and PEP awareness was associated with older age (p<0.05), being non-binary/gender-diverse (p<0.05), and MSM (p<0.05). Lower odds of PrEP awareness were associated with international student status (p<0.05). This study highlights the need for future health promotion targeting younger Australians at risk of HIV to increase uptake of PrEP/PEP, particularly among overseas-born young people and those ineligible for appropriate health care in Australia. Addressing these gaps will improve sexual health outcomes for young Australians at risk of HIV and work towards virtual elimination of HIV transmission in Australia.

3 October 2024 in Culture, Health & Sexuality
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
AMArabella Mundie
Arabella Mundie
AMAmy Mullens
Amy Mullens
EFErich C. Fein
Erich C. Fein
SBSara Fiona Elisabeth BELL
Sara Fiona Elisabeth BELL
JDJoseph Debattista
Joseph Debattista
JDJudith Ann Dean
Judith Ann Dean
University attendance can lead to changes in sexual behaviour that place people at increased risk of negative sexual and reproductive health (SRH) experiences; however, relatively few studies have explored access to and use of SRH services by university students in Australia. A convenience sample of students (N = 4291) from five universities completed an online survey to examine barriers and facilitators to accessing SRH services. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse variations by gender, sexuality, and enrolment status. Content analyses were conducted on responses to two open-ended questions. Over half (59%, 2934) had never spoken to a health professional about SRH issues. Of the 41% (1357) who had, female, non-binary/gender diverse, and Australian-born students were significantly more likely to have done so than students identifying as male, heterosexual, or as an international student. Frequently reported barriers to use of SRH services were 'feeling embarrassed', 'being judged' and 'not knowing where to go'. LGBTQIA+ students along with international and overseas-born domestic students faced specific access barriers. Recommendations targeting student-identified barriers to access are offered, calling for universities to support student wellbeing by providing supportive, non-judgemental, and inclusive SRH promotion and health services that cater to needs of diverse student cohorts.

16 June 2023 in The Lancet Microbe
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SBSara Fiona Elisabeth BELL
Sara Fiona Elisabeth BELL
RWRobert S Ware
Robert S Ware
DLDavid A Lewis
David A Lewis
MLMonica M Lahra
Monica M Lahra
DWDavid David Whiley
David David Whiley
Neisseria gonorrhoeae treatment guided by molecular antimicrobial susceptibility assays could improve treatment options and antimicrobial stewardship; however, few commercial assays are available. We aimed to investigate antimicrobial susceptibility of N gonorrhoeae isolates in New South Wales, Australia, and estimate the potential usefulness of hypothetical combinations of rapid molecular antimicrobial susceptibility assays. In this proof-of-principle, population-based, retrospective analysis, we assessed N gonorrhoeae susceptibility data for ceftriaxone, azithromycin, ciprofloxacin, and penicillin. Isolates were previously collected as part of the Australian Gonococcal Surveillance Programme between Jan 1, 2008, and Dec 31, 2019. All cultured N gonorrhoeae isolates with susceptibility data to all four antimicrobials were included. However, only one isolate was included if several isolates originated from the same individual within 13 days of the previous isolate originating from that individual, and there were less than two standard double-dilution minimum inhibitory concentrations between the isolates. We assessed the use of different combinations of hypothetical antimicrobial susceptibility assays and treatment combinations in terms of their ability to minimise overall ceftriaxone use, and use specifically in isolates with decreased susceptibility to ceftriaxone, compared with standard non-assay-guided empirical ceftriaxone treatment. We included 23 089 N gonorrhoeae isolates. The prevalence of antimicrobial sensitivity fluctuated significantly during the study. Isolates with decreased susceptibility to ceftriaxone were more likely to be resistant to one or more antimicrobials than isolates without decreased susceptibility (782 [98·6%] of 793 vs 10 661 [47·8%] of 22 296), particularly ciprofloxacin (p<0·0001) and penicillin (p<0·0001). Compared with empirical ceftriaxone treatment, we estimated that strategies based on the use of hypothetical antimicrobial susceptibility would reduce ceftriaxone use (p<0·0001). However, because of co-resistance, most assay-directed treatment strategies, including those involving use of assays for two antibiotics, would result in only moderate reductions in ceftriaxone use among isolates with decreased susceptibility to ceftriaxone. Individualised treatment guided by molecular antimicrobial susceptibility diagnostics could help to reduce overall ceftriaxone use in gonorrhoea. However, the use of these assays needs to be informed by the non-random nature of co-resistance among circulating N gonorrhoeae strains. Australian Government and Queensland Government.

30 August 2018 in AIDS Care
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SBSara Fiona Elisabeth BELL
Sara Fiona Elisabeth BELL
JDJudith Ann Dean
Judith Ann Dean
JLJime Lemoire
Jime Lemoire
JDJoseph Debattista
Joseph Debattista
GDGlen Driver
Glen Driver
OWOwain David Williams
Owain David Williams
This study aims to pilot and evaluate an integrated model for HIV self-testing (HIVST) service delivery in a peer-led Queensland community setting to increase access to HIVST, particularly for men who have sex with men (MSM) living in regional, remote and rural areas. It seeks to provide evidence that would overcome some of the key objections previously raised to HIVST. Recruitment strategies have been designed to engage hard to reach MSM populations in testing. Awareness of the trial will be generated through advertising on social media platforms, including dating applications, word of mouth and HIV related websites. Participants will access an HIVST online ordering system hosted by a HIV community organisation. This system: (1) enables on-line informed consent; 2) gives clients the choice to accept verbal pre-test information from a trained peer test facilitator or not; and (3) allows for ordering of the HIVST kit after completion of an online survey (with demographic information and testing history etc.). Clients receive the kits via the post; and at 2 weeks receive a follow-up phone-call and SMS link to a post-test survey. If the test is non-reactive, clients can opt for test reminders. If reactive, referral to clinical services, peer navigation and support systems are provided. This study addresses important gaps in understanding of acceptable and feasible methods to integrate HIVST into an existing peer-led testing service and into the broader suite of HIV testing options and services. The findings will inform the actions needed to enhance access to HIVST for MSM wishing to use this technology in Australia and elsewhere, especially those who have never tested and infrequent testers.