As wildfires intensify globally due to climate change, accurate wildfire danger forecasting systems have become essential for effective disaster management and early warning. Fuel Moisture Content (FMC), defined as the ratio of water mass to dry fuel mass, plays a critical role in determining ignition probability and fire spread dynamics. This study conducts a comparative analysis of five major national wildfire danger rating systems: the National Fire Danger Rating System (NFDRS, USA), Canadian Forest Fire Danger Rating System (CFFDRS), European Forest Fire Information System (EFFIS), Australian Fire Danger Rating System (AFDRS), and the Korean Forest Fire Danger Rating System (KFDRS). Using a multi-criteria comparative framework, the systems were evaluated based on fuel classification structure, input variables, modeling approach, and spatiotemporal prediction resolution. The results reveal substantial disparities in spatial resolution (100 m to district-level), temporal resolution (hourly vs. daily), and fuel moisture modeling approaches (physics-based, index-based, and hybrid systems). Specifically, NFDRS and AFDRS provide high-frequency forecasting with hourly temporal resolution, operating at spatial resolutions of 1 km and 100 m, respectively, and incorporating dynamic fuel moisture modeling. In contrast, CFFDRS and KFDRS primarily rely on daily index-based predictions. Furthermore, while many global systems increasingly leverage remote sensing and machine learning for real-time FMC estimation, South Korea’s KFDRS remains predominantly empirical and weather-driven. The analysis identifies critical limitations in the KFDRS, including coarse spatial resolution (district-level), limited integration of Live Fuel Moisture Content (LFMC) modeling, and the lack of AI-augmented hybrid approaches. Accordingly, this study proposes a phased three-stage policy roadmap (2026–2035), emphasizing sensor-network expansion, AI–physics fusion modeling, and high-resolution (10 m) FMC mapping to enhance forecasting accuracy in complex terrains. These findings provide strategic insights for improving wildfire risk management and supporting the transition from reactive response to predictive wildfire forecasting under increasing climate variability.

Military–civilian interface zones (MCIZs) adjacent to the Korean Demilitarized Zone (DMZ) represent complex wildfire environments shaped by restricted access, intensive military activities, and adjacent civilian land use. This study develops a spatially explicit wildfire ignition risk assessment framework for the DMZ and Civilian Control Zone (CCZ) in Paju, South Korea, employing Random Forest (RF), Generalized Additive Models (GAM), and Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR) in a complementary analytical design. A dataset of 318 wildfire ignition events (2001–2024), including 78 associated with military activities, was analyzed. The RF model achieved high predictive accuracy (AUC = 0.81), identifying proximity to military training zones, relative humidity, wind speed, and proximity to built infrastructure as dominant ignition drivers. GAM revealed narrow nonlinear thresholds—relative humidity at 13.8%–14.0% and wind speed at 13.5–14.0 m/s—corresponding to peak ignition probabilities. GWR demonstrated pronounced spatial heterogeneity, with military proximity exerting a stronger influence in the eastern and northern sectors, while the meteorological effects varied geographically. Based on these outputs, a unified analytical framework was established in which RF-derived ignition probabilities were interpreted alongside GAM- and GWR-based explanatory layers to provide spatially explicit ignition susceptibility assessments without numerical map fusion. The proposed approach provides a scientifically rigorous and operationally applicable method for quantifying ignition risk in politically sensitive, access-restricted landscapes, offering valuable insights for adaptive wildfire prevention and spatially informed governance of transboundary fire risk.