Dislocation of the elbow associated with radial head and coronoid fracture, the so-called “terrible triad” of the elbow, is challenging to treat and has a history of complicated outcomes. However, advances in the knowledge of elbow kinematics combined with improved implants and surgical techniques during the past few years have led to the development of standard surgical protocols. This review article analyses the results in 137 elbow triad injuries of five studies treated using the current protocols. These include fixation of the coronoid fracture, repair or replacement the radial head, and repair of the lateral ligament complex, reserving medial collateral ligament repair and application of hinged external fixation for patients with residual instability. Treatment of these demanding injuries appeared effective in the majority of cases, i.e. with an average of 31 months of follow-up, overall flexion arc was 111.4°, averaged flexion was 132.5° with forearm rotation of 135.5°, Mayo elbow performance score was 85.6 points, and Broberg-Morrey score was 85 points. Nevertheless, the patient should be informed about the incidence of complications including joint stiffness, ulnar nerve symptoms or post-traumatic arthritis.
Adult acquired flatfoot deformity (AAFD) is traditionally related to a tibialis posterior tendon deficiency. In the intermediate stages, treatments are commonly focused on reinforcing this tissue, but sometimes the deformation appears again over time, necessitating the use of more aggressive options. Tissue stress cannot be consistently evaluated through traditional experimental trials. Computational foot modeling extends knowledge of the disease and could help guide the clinical decisions. This study analyzes the biomechanical stress of the main tissues related to AAFD and their capacity to support the plantar arch. A FE foot model was reconstructed. All the bones, cartilages and tissues related to AAFD were included, respecting their biomechanical characteristics. The biomechanical tissue stress was quantified. The capacity of each soft tissue to support the plantar arch was measured, following clinical criteria. Biomechanical stress of the tibialis posterior tendon is considerably superior to both the plantar fascia and spring ligament stress. However, it cannot maintain the plantar arch by itself. Both the tibialis posterior tendon and spring ligament act in reducing the hindfoot pronation, while the plantar fascia is the main tissue that prevents arch elongation. The Achilles tendon action increases the plantar tissue stress. The tibialis posterior tendon stress increases when the spring ligament or the fascia plantar fails. These findings are consistent with the theory that regards the tibialis posterior tendon as a secondary actor because it cannot support the plantar arch and claudicates when the hindfoot has rotated around the talonavicular joint.