Michael Osborne

Dr. Michael Osborne

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2014 in JACC
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RBRon Blankstein
Ron Blankstein
MOMichael Osborne
Michael Osborne
MNMasanao Naya
Masanao Naya
AWAlfonso Waller
Alfonso Waller
CKChun K. Kim
Chun K. Kim
MCMarcelo F. Di Carli
Marcelo F. Di Carli

26 December 2017 in European Heart Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VTViviany R Taqueti
Viviany R Taqueti
SSScott D Solomon
Scott D Solomon
ASAmil M Shah
Amil M Shah
ADAkshay S Desai
Akshay S Desai
JGJohn D Groarke
John D Groarke
MCMarcelo F Di Carli
Marcelo F Di Carli
Coronary microvascular ischaemia, cardiomyocyte injury and stiffness may play an important role in the pathophysiology of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). To date, the relationship between coronary flow reserve (CFR), myocardial injury, diastolic dysfunction, and future HFpEF risk is unknown. Consecutive patients (n = 201) undergoing evaluation for suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) with stress myocardial perfusion positron emission tomography, serum troponin, and transthoracic echocardiography who did not have flow-limiting CAD or reduced left ventricular ejection fraction were identified. Patients were followed up (median 4.1 years) for cardiovascular death and hospitalization for non-fatal myocardial infarction or heart failure. Coronary flow reserve was quantified as stress/rest myocardial blood flow. Early diastolic flow (E) and relaxation (e′) velocities were obtained via transmitral and tissue Doppler, respectively. Patients with impaired CFR (<2, n = 108) demonstrated linearly decreasing e′ and increasing E/e′ consistent with worsening diastolic function (P for trend 15, adjusted OR 2.58, 95%CI 1.22–5.48) and composite cardiovascular outcomes or HFpEF hospitalization alone (adjusted HR 2.47, 95%CI 1.09–5.62). Patients with both impaired CFR and diastolic dysfunction demonstrated >five-fold increased risk of HFpEF hospitalization (P < 0.001). In symptomatic patients without overt CAD, impaired CFR was independently associated with diastolic dysfunction and adverse events, especially HFpEF hospitalization. The presence of both coronary microvascular and diastolic dysfunctions was associated with a markedly increased risk of HFpEF events.

16 January 2018 in Journal of Experimental Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MHMaarten Hulsmans
Maarten Hulsmans
HSHendrik B. Sager
Hendrik B. Sager
JRJason D. Roh
Jason D. Roh
MVMaría Valero-Muñoz
María Valero-Muñoz
NHNicholas E. Houstis
Nicholas E. Houstis
MNMatthias Nahrendorf
Matthias Nahrendorf
Macrophages populate the healthy myocardium and, depending on their phenotype, may contribute to tissue homeostasis or disease. Their origin and role in diastolic dysfunction, a hallmark of cardiac aging and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, remain unclear. Here we show that cardiac macrophages expand in humans and mice with diastolic dysfunction, which in mice was induced by either hypertension or advanced age. A higher murine myocardial macrophage density results from monocyte recruitment and increased hematopoiesis in bone marrow and spleen. In humans, we observed a parallel constellation of hematopoietic activation: circulating myeloid cells are more frequent, and splenic 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging signal correlates with echocardiographic indices of diastolic dysfunction. While diastolic dysfunction develops, cardiac macrophages produce IL-10, activate fibroblasts, and stimulate collagen deposition, leading to impaired myocardial relaxation and increased myocardial stiffness. Deletion of IL-10 in macrophages improves diastolic function. These data imply expansion and phenotypic changes of cardiac macrophages as therapeutic targets for cardiac fibrosis leading to diastolic dysfunction.

1 February 2014 in Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MOMichael Osborne
Michael Osborne
EHEdward A. Hulten
Edward A. Hulten
ASAvinainder Singh
Avinainder Singh
AWAlfonso H. Waller
Alfonso H. Waller
MBMarcio S. Bittencourt
Marcio S. Bittencourt
RBRon Blankstein
Ron Blankstein

12 December 2017 in Circulation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AGAnkur Gupta
Ankur Gupta
VTViviany R. Taqueti
Viviany R. Taqueti
THTim P. van de Hoef
Tim P. van de Hoef
NBNavkaranbir S. Bajaj
Navkaranbir S. Bajaj
PBPaco E. Bravo
Paco E. Bravo
MCMarcelo F. Di Carli
Marcelo F. Di Carli
Background: It is suggested that the integration of maximal myocardial blood flow (MBF) and coronary flow reserve (CFR), termed coronary flow capacity, allows for comprehensive evaluation of patients with known or suspected stable coronary artery disease. Because management decisions are predicated on clinical risk, we sought to determine the independent and integrated value of maximal MBF and CFR for predicting cardiovascular death. Methods: MBF and CFR were quantified in 4029 consecutive patients (median age 66 years, 50.5% women) referred for rest/stress myocardial perfusion positron emission tomography scans from January 2006 to December 2013. The primary outcome was cardiovascular mortality. Maximal MBF <1.8 mL·g −1 ·min −1 and CFR<2 were considered impaired. Four patient groups were identified based on the concordant or discordant impairment of maximal MBF or CFR. Association of maximal MBF and CFR with cardiovascular death was assessed using Cox and Poisson regression analyses. Results: A total of 392 (9.7%) cardiovascular deaths occurred over a median follow-up of 5.6 years. CFR was a stronger predictor of cardiovascular mortality than maximal MBF beyond traditional cardiovascular risk factors, left ventricular ejection fraction, myocardial scar and ischemia, rate-pressure product, type of radiotracer or stress agent used, and revascularization after scan (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.38–2.31; P <0.001 per unit decrease in CFR after adjustment for maximal MBF and clinical covariates; and adjusted hazard ratio, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.84–1.27; P =0.8 per unit decrease in maximal MBF after adjustment for CFR and clinical covariates). In univariable analyses, patients with concordant impairment of CFR and maximal MBF had high cardiovascular mortality of 3.3% (95% CI, 2.9–3.7) per year. Patients with impaired CFR but preserved maximal MBF had an intermediate cardiovascular mortality of 1.7% (95% CI, 1.3–2.1) per year. These patients were predominantly women (70%). Patients with preserved CFR but impaired maximal MBF had low cardiovascular mortality of 0.9% (95% CI, 0.6–1.6) per year. Patients with concordantly preserved CFR and maximal MBF had the lowest cardiovascular mortality of 0.4% (95 CI, 0.3–0.6) per year. In multivariable analysis, the cardiovascular mortality risk gradient across the 4 concordant or discordant categories was independently driven by impaired CFR irrespective of impairment in maximal MBF. Conclusions: CFR is a stronger predictor of cardiovascular mortality than maximal MBF. Concordant and discordant categories based on integrating CFR and maximal MBF identify unique prognostic phenotypes of patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease.

26 April 2019 in Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TDTawseef Dar
Tawseef Dar
ARAzar Radfar
Azar Radfar
SAShady Abohashem
Shady Abohashem
RPRoger K. Pitman
Roger K. Pitman
ATAhmed Tawakol
Ahmed Tawakol
MOMichael Osborne
Michael Osborne