Background: Increased oxidative stress is a hallmark of end-stage renal disease. Hemodialysis (HD) patients lacking glutathione transferase M1 (GSTM1) enzyme activity exhibit enhanced oxidative DNA damage and higher mortality rate than those with active GSTM1 enzyme. To our knowledge, this is the first study to use the vitamin E-bonded membranes (VEM) in patients with homozygous GSTM1 gene deletion, and we aimed to determine the effect of VEM on oxidative and inflammatory status in HD patients with homozygous GSTM1 gene deletion. Methods: GSTM1 genotypes were determined by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in 170 chronic HD patients. Those with GSTM1-null genotype were randomized and 80 were included in the study. Forty of them were dialyzed for three months with VEM, while the other forty were dialyzed with high-flux same-surface polysulfone dialyzers. Markers of protein and lipid oxidative damage and inflammation (thiol groups, malondialdehyde (MDA), Interleukin-6 (IL-6)), together with plasma antioxidant activity (glutathione peroxidase (GPX), superoxide dismutase (SOD)) were determined. Results: Seventy-five patients finished the study. There were no differences at baseline in markers of protein and lipid oxidative damage, inflammation and plasma antioxidant activity. After three months of therapy, GPX, MDA, and thiol groups increased significantly in both groups, but without statistical significance between groups. SOD and C reactive protein (CRP) did not change significantly during the three-month period. IL-6 increased in the control group, and at the same time, decreased in the VEM group, but without statistical significance. Hemoglobin (Hb) value, red blood cells, erythropoiesis resistance index (ERI), serum ferritin and iron did not change significantly within or between groups. Regarding other laboratory parameters, proteins, albumins, triglycerides, serum phosphorus, serum bicarbonate and Kt/V showed significant improvements within groups but with no significant difference between groups. Conclusions: Our data shows that therapy with VEM over three months had no benefit over standard polysulfone membrane in decreasing by-products of oxidative stress and inflammation in dialysis patients lacking GSTM1 enzyme activity.

The complications of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are well known and one of them is diabetic chronic kidney disease (DCKD). Over time, it has become clear that patients with T2DM can have nondiabetic chronic kidney diseases (NDCKD), especially those that affect the glomeruli. Clinical indicators for identifying DCKD from NDCKD with high sensitivity and specificity have not yet been identified. Therefore, kidney biopsy remains the golden standard for DCKD diagnosis in patients with T2DM. Despite some indications for kidney biopsy, criteria for a biopsy differ between countries, regions, and doctors. The aim of the study was to analyze the biopsy findings in our T2DM population and the justification of the biopsy according to widely accepted criteria. This single center retrospective study analyzed data from 74 patients with T2DM who underwent kidney biopsy from January 2014 to January 2021. According to the biopsy data, we categorized31 patients in the DN group, patients with typical diabetic glomerulopathy, 11 patients in the mixed group, patients who had pathohistological elements for both DN and non-DN glomerulopathy, and 32 patients in the non-DN group, patients with primary glomerulopathy not linked with DM. In the non-DN and mixed groups, the most frequent glomerulopathy was mesangioproliferative glomerulonephritis, including IgA and non-IgA forms, found in 10 patients, and membranous nephropathy (MN) in 10 patients. We analyzed several parameters and only the amount of proteinuria was found to be significantly linked to biopsy findings related to DN. With the existing criteria for kidney biopsy, we managed to detect changes in the kidneys in about half of our patients with T2DM. These patients required specific treatment, different from that which we use for DCKD patients.

Glycemic assessment in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) Stage V on hemodialysis (HD) is limited by the inaccuracy of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), mainly due to anemia, shortened erythrocyte lifespan, and erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) therapy. Glycated albumin (GA), independent of erythrocyte turnover, may better reflect glycemic exposure. We evaluated the diagnostic performance and clinical utility of GA as a biomarker of poor glycemic control and cardiovascular risk in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). A cross-sectional analysis and five-year prospective follow-up were conducted in three subgroups: HD+DM+ (n = 40), HD- DM+ (n = 15), and HD+DM– (n = 22). Glycemic markers (mean plasma glucose over 3 months (PG₃m), GA, and HbA1c) were compared between groups. GA levels were significantly higher in HD+DM+ patients (p < 0.001) and showed the strongest correlation with PG₃m. GA independently predicted poor glycemic control (OR 3.23; 95% CI 1.54–6.77; p = 0.002) and demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy (AUC 0.873; optimal cut-off 10%). During the five-year follow-up, CV mortality was 35%, and 85% of deceased patients had GA > 10%. Although Cox regression did not reach statistical significance, GA showed a consistent trend toward higher CV mortality risk after adjustment for age and HD duration (HR 2.56; 95% CI 0.57–11.44; p = 0.21), whereas HbA1c was not prognostic (HR 1.39; 95% CI 0.49–3.91; p = 0.28). GA appears to be a clinically useful marker of glycemic control in diabetic patients with CKD Stage V receiving maintenance hemodialysis. In this cohort, GA showed high diagnostic accuracy and a more balanced sensitivity/specificity profile compared with HbA1c, with a consistent trend toward association with cardiovascular mortality. In this regard, the wider use of this marker in clinical practice is worth considering. Nevertheless, larger prospective studies are warranted to validate these observations.

Background and Aims: The new coronavirus disease (COVID 19) has become a worldwide health emergency with a wide spectrum of clinical presentation, from common cold symptoms to multiorgan failure. A great number of medical centers have reported that patients with COVID-19 have developed acute kidney injury. The kidney is a target organ for SARS - COV2 because of ACE2 receptor, the binding site for this virus, is expressed in kidney tissue. The potential mechanisms for kidney injury are direct kidney injury, inflammation, activation of coagulation and complement cascades. Data from centers worldwide reported a wide range of AKI incidence, from 0,5% in China to 46% in USA. The aim of this study was to analyze incidence, risk factors and outcomes of AKI in hospitalized patients with COVID 19 who were treated from 01.04. to 01.06.2020. at Nephrology Department of University Clinical Center Zvezdara, which was at the time transformed into COVID hospital. Method: This retrospective observational study included 51 patients who had normal kidney function before the infection with SARS COV2, and 7 of them developed dialysis non-dependent AKI. Analysis included data collection from the patients’ history including demographic, clinical and administrative data. Statistical analysis has been performed using SPSS software version 20 (IBM Corporation, New York, USA). Results: Out of 51 patients 7 (13.7%) developed AKI, mean age was 59 + 16 years and 53% were male. Diabetes mellitus was present in 27 of patients with AKI, hypertension in 6/7, obesity in 3/7, coronary artery disease in 1/7 and 1 of 7 patients was smoker. These risk factors except obesity (p= 0.05) didn’t vary significantly between two groups (AKI and non AKI patients with COVID-19). Our results showed significant correlation between AKI development and obesity (p= 0.05, OR 4.75), Charlston index score (p=0.01), D dimer score (p=0.01), and CT COVID score (p=0.03). Regarding the outcome, COVID 19 patients with AKI showed 7-fold higher risk for fatal outcome (p= 0.046). Conclusion: Obesity, higher D dimer values, worse CT findings and higher Charlston comorbidity score index were associated with acute kidney injury in patients with COVID 19. AKI proved to be significant risk factor for fatal outcome in patients with SARS COV2 infection.

Background: Obesity has reached epidemic proportions and represents a challenge in selecting the optimal renal replacement therapy for patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients according to baseline body mass index (BMI) and to assess the impact of BMI changes during follow-up on PD-related complications and patient outcomes. Methods: This retrospective, single-center study included 53 incident PD patients treated between June 2006 and August 2015. Based on baseline BMI, patients were classified as normal weight (18.5–24.9 kg/m²; n = 17), overweight (25.0–29.9 kg/m²; n = 25), or obese (≥30.0 kg/m²; n = 11). PD adequacy, mechanical and infectious complications, technique survival, and patient survival were assessed over a 48-month follow-up. The effect of BMI changes during follow-up was also analyzed. Results: At PD initiation, total weekly Kt/V was significantly lower in the obese compared with the normal-weight patients (2.0 ± 0.4 vs. 2.3 ± 0.5; p = 0.038), although values remained within the ISPD targets. The normal-weight patients had lower urine output compared with the overweight patients (p = 0.038). Exit-site infections were the most frequent, whereas peritonitis incidence was the lowest in the obese patients, without statistically significant differences. The obese patients demonstrated poorer technique survival and overall survival, again without statistical significance. Mean BMI change after one year was 1.65 ± 2.08 kg/m², and after 4 years, it was 2.07 ± 3.18 kg/m². The BMI change was not associated with complications or survival. Conclusions: No significant association during the 48-month follow-up period was observed between baseline nutritional status or weight gain assessed by body mass index and adverse peritoneal dialysis outcomes; therefore, overweight and obese patients can achieve adequate PD performance and may defer or avoid transition to hemodialysis.