Moritz Bleymehl

Dr. Moritz Bleymehl


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

4Years (2023-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2023 in Antibiotics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
OROliver Ristow
Oliver Ristow
TRThomas Rückschloß
Thomas Rückschloß
GSGregor Schnug
Gregor Schnug
JMJulius Moratin
Julius Moratin
MBMoritz Bleymehl
Moritz Bleymehl
MSMaximilian Smielowski
Maximilian Smielowski
In the present study, the impacts on success rates between three different antibiotic regimes in patients receiving preventive tooth extraction during/after antiresorptive treatment were compared. For the retrospective analysis, we enrolled patients who had undergone tooth extraction from 2009 to 2019 according to the specified preventive conditions under antiresorptive therapy. Three antibiotic regimens were distinguished: (Group 1) intravenous for 7 days, (Group 2) oral for 14 days, and (Group 3) oral for 7 days of application. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw at 12 weeks after surgery. A total of 760 patients and 1143 extraction regions were evaluated (Group 1 n = 719; Group 2 n = 126; Group 3 n = 298). The primary endpoint showed no significant difference in the development of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw between the groups studied (Group 1 n = 50/669 (7%); Group 2 n = 9/117 (7%); Group 3 n = 17/281 (6%); p = 0.746). Overall, the success rate was 93% after intervention when preventive measures were followed. With the same success rate, a reduced, oral administration of antibiotics seems to be sufficient regarding the possible spectrum of side effects, the development of resistance and the health economic point of view.

31 January 2023 in Medicina
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TRThomas Rückschloß
Thomas Rückschloß
MSMaximilian Smielowski
Maximilian Smielowski
JMJulius Moratin
Julius Moratin
GSGregor Schnug
Gregor Schnug
MAMaximilian Appel
Maximilian Appel
OROliver Ristow
Oliver Ristow
Background and Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of surgical and conservative, non-surgical treatment on general health-related (QoL) and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) in patients suffering from AAOMS stage I MRONJ. Materials and Methods: In the course of this prospective clinical study, QoL and OHRQoL using QLQ-C30 and QHIP G14 questionnaire were longitudinally assessed in N = 174 prospectively enrolled patients with indication of treatment of MRONJ stage I over a period of 12 months. Patients received conservative or surgical treatment. The measurement time points were preoperatively (T0), 12 weeks (T1), 6 months (T2) and 1 year after operation (T3). Results: For OHRQoL, no significant (p > 0.05) differences were found between both treatment groups for all timepoints (T0–T3). In the surgical treatment group, OHIP scores of T1, T2 and T3 were significantly lower than baseline measures (T0) (T0–T1 (2.99, p = 0.024), T0–T2 (5.20, p < 0.001), T0–T3 (7.44, p < 0.001)). For conservative treatment group OHIP, scores of T2 and T3 were significantly lower than baseline measures (T0) (T0–T2 (9.09, p = 0.013), T0–T3 (12.79, p < 0.001)). There was no statistically significant effect of time on QLQ-C30 scores in both groups (surgical treatment: F(3, 174) = 1.542, p < 0.205, partial η2 = 0.026; conservative treatment: F(3, 30) = 0.528, p = 0.667, partial η2 = 0.050). QLQ-C30 scores turned out to be significantly lower in the non-surgical group at T1 (p = 0.036) and T3 (p = 0.047) compared to the surgical treatment group. Conclusions: Surgical and conservative treatment of MRONJ stage I significantly improves patients’ OHRQoL. Surgical treatment is superior to conservative treatment of MRONJ stage I regarding general QoL. Therefore, surgical treatment of MRONJ stage I should not be omitted for QoL reasons.

26 September 2023 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JMJulius Moratin
Julius Moratin
PTPhilip Dao Trong
Philip Dao Trong
KSKarl Semmelmayer
Karl Semmelmayer
JMJan Mrosek
Jan Mrosek
SZSven Zittel
Sven Zittel
MEMichael Engel
Michael Engel
Free flap reconstruction is the standard of care for extensive defects of the head and neck area. In this study, two types of free flaps, the antero-lateral thigh flap (ALT) and the vastus lateralis muscle flap, were compared. The primary endpoint was flap success, secondary endpoints were complication rates, hospitalization and surgery time. Cases with defect situations of the scalp and consecutive microvascular free flap reconstructions using either ALT flaps or vastus lateralis muscle flaps between 2014 and 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Indications, perioperative handling and outcomes were compared. Twenty patients were included in the analysis. Ten patients (50%) received a free flap reconstruction using an ALT flap and ten patients (50%) received a vastus lateralis flap. A simultaneous two-team approach was possible in each case and the flap success rate was 100% with the need for one successful anastomosis revision. The mean defect size in our cohort was 147 ± 46 cm2. There were no significant differences in surgery time, duration of hospitalization or complication rate between both cohorts. Both free flaps, the ALT and the vastus lateralis flap, are suitable for the closure of large scalp defects. They provide high success rates, short surgery times without the need for patient repositioning and low donor-site morbidity. The vastus lateralis muscle flap bares the advantage of being perforator-independent and allows for the preparation of long vessels for anastomosis if needed while baring the disadvantage of a prolonged period of healing via granulation or the need for secondary surgery in terms of covering by split-thickness skin grafts which may interfere with necessary adjuvant treatment in oncological patients.

31 July 2023 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JMJulius Moratin
Julius Moratin
DHDominik Horn
Dominik Horn
KSKarl Semmelmayer
Karl Semmelmayer
OROliver Ristow
Oliver Ristow
MEMichael Engel
Michael Engel
CFChristian Freudlsperger
Christian Freudlsperger
The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical outcomes of three types of minor salivary gland carcinomas (adenoid-cystic carcinomas (ACC), adeno carcinomas not otherwise specified (AC-NOS), and mucoepidermoid carcinomas (MEC)) after primary surgical therapy. A retrospective cohort study was designed and patients with cancer of the minor oral salivary glands treated in our department in the years 2011 to 2022 were included. Clinicopathological data were evaluated to compare overall survival and progression-free survival between the entities. Eighty-one patients were included. The rates of cervical metastases were 38.9% for ACC, 25% for MEC, and 9.1% for AC-NOS. ACC exhibited significantly higher rates of local and systemic disease recurrence (p = 0.02), and the presence of neck node metastases was confirmed as an independent prognostic factor for progression-free survival (p = 0.014). Treatment success in terms of oncological outcome varied significantly between the different entities and implies different treatment regimens for each tumor entity.

27 January 2026 in Medical Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Davut Deniz UzunDavut Deniz Uzun
Davut Deniz Uzun
TGTobias Gruebl
Tobias Gruebl
MBMoritz Bleymehl
Moritz Bleymehl
OROliver Ristow
Oliver Ristow
Fabian WeykampFabian Weykamp
Fabian Weykamp
KLKristin Lang
Kristin Lang
Background: Osteoradionecrosis (ORN) following head and neck radiotherapy has been demonstrated to induce structural and functional alterations of the upper airway, with the potential to complicate the process of tracheal intubation. Despite its clinical relevance, there is a paucity of systematic evidence on airway characteristics in ORN and reliable predictors of difficult tracheal intubation. This study compares preoperative airway parameters and tracheal intubation outcomes in irradiated patients with and without ORN and introduces a novel preoperative ORN-Difficult-Airway Score for risk stratification. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, airway assessments, tracheal intubation methods, and perioperative visualization parameters were evaluated in 105 patients following head and neck radiotherapy. Group differences between non-ORN and ORN were analyzed using chi-square tests. A preoperative ORN-Difficult-Airway Score was constructed using exclusively bedside parameters, based on statistically and clinically relevant predictors. Results: Patients with ORN showed significantly restricted mouth opening (p < 0.001), higher Mallampati classes, particularly Mallampati IV, and a greater need for fiberoptic tracheal intubation (p < 0.01). Direct laryngoscopy (DL) was significantly less feasible in ORN, while hyperangulated videolaryngoscopy (VL) yielded consistently positive visualization (first-pass success (FPS) 100% in both groups). Under DL, FPS was lower in ORN (54.2% vs. 79.5%), resulting in an odds ratio of 0.305. Based on observed predictors, ORN status, mouth opening <3 cm, Mallampati class, restricted neck reclination, and history of difficult intubation, a preoperative ORN-Difficult-Airway Score was developed. Conclusions: ORN has been associated with distinct alterations in airway anatomy and visualization, resulting in increased tracheal intubation complexity after head and neck radiotherapy. The proposed ORN-Difficult-Airway Score presents a clinically practical, bedside-applicable approach to stratifying the risk of tracheal intubation in this population. Prior to clinical implementation, prospective validation in larger cohorts is warranted.

12 February 2025 in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MBMoritz Bleymehl
Moritz Bleymehl
JMJulius Moratin
Julius Moratin
MSMaximilian Smielowski
Maximilian Smielowski
GSGregor Schnug
Gregor Schnug
TRThomas Rückschloß
Thomas Rückschloß
OROliver Ristow
Oliver Ristow