Background: Although coordination of care and integrated care models aim to enhance patient satisfaction and perceived care quality, evidence regarding their practical implementation remains scarce. Understanding the nuances of collaboration across care providers to achieve effective coordination of care is imperative for seamless care integration. The aim of this study was to construct a grounded theory of how inter-organizational collaboration is performed to support coordination of care for patients with complex care needs. Methods: A qualitative design with a constructivist grounded theory approach was applied. In total, 86 participants with diverse backgrounds were recruited across multiple care settings, including hospitals, ambulance services, primary care centers, municipal home healthcare and home care services. The grounded theory was developed iteratively, based on a combination of observations and interviews, and using constant comparative analysis. Results: Coordination of care, a complex process that occurs across interconnected healthcare organizations, is manifested as “Negotiating care in organizational borderlands.” Care coordination evolves through a spectrum of inter-organizational collaboration, ranging from “Dividing care by disease-specific expertise” to “Establishing paths for collaboration” and ultimately “Co-constructing a comprehensive whole.” These categories highlight the challenges of coordinating care across both professional and organizational boundaries. In the multifaceted healthcare landscape, effective care coordination occurs when healthcare professionals actively bridge the divides, leveraging their collective expertise. Importantly, organizational boundaries may serve a purpose and should not be dissolved to facilitate effective care coordination. Conclusions: The key to effective care coordination lies in robust inter-organizational collaboration. Even when patients receive integrated care, healthcare professionals may have fragmented roles. This research emphasizes the importance of clearly defined lines of accountability, reinforcing mutual responsibility and facilitating bridging of professional and organizational boundaries. Healthcare professionals and policymakers can use these insights to effectively utilize inter-organizational collaboration in supporting care coordination for patients with complex care needs.

Background: Hospital discharge is a complex process encompassing multiple interactions and requiring coordination. To identify potential improvement measures in care transitions for people with complex care needs, intra- and inter-organisational everyday work needs to be properly understood, including its interdependencies, vulnerabilities and gaps. The aims of this study were to 1) map coordination and team collaboration across healthcare and social care organisations, 2) describe interdependencies and system variability in the discharge process for older people with complex care needs, and 3) evaluate the alignment between discharge planning and the needs in the home. Methods: Data were collected through participant observations, interviews, and document review in a region of southern Sweden. The Functional Resonance Analysis Method (FRAM) was used to model the discharge process and visualise and analyse coordination of care across healthcare and social care organisations. Results: Hospital discharge is a time-sensitive process with numerous couplings and interdependencies where healthcare professionals’ performance is constrained by system design and organisational boundaries. The greatest vulnerability can be found when the patient arrives at home, as maladaptation earlier in the care chain can lead to an accumulation of issues for the municipal personnel in health and social care working closest to the patient. The possibilities for the personnel to adapt are limited, especially at certain times of day, pushing them to make trade-offs to ensure patient safety. Flexibility and appropriate resources enable for handling variability and responding to uncertainties in care after discharge. Conclusions: Mapping hospital discharge using the FRAM reveals couplings and interdependencies between various individuals, teams, and organisations and the most vulnerable point, when the patient arrives at home. Resilient performance in responding to unexpected events and variations during the first days after the return home requires a system allowing flexibility and facilitating successful adaptation of discharge planning.

Aim: The aim of this study was to visualize vulnerabilities and explore the dynamics of inter‐professional collaboration and organizational adaptability in the context of care transitions for patients with complex care needs. Design: An ethnographic design using multiple convergent data collection techniques. Methods: Data collection involved document review, participant observations and interviews with healthcare and social care professionals (HSCPs). Narrative analysis was employed to construct two illustrative patient scenarios, which were then examined using the Functional Resonance Analysis Method (FRAM). Thematic analysis was subsequently applied to synthesize the findings. Results: Inconsistencies in timing and precision during care transitions pose risks for patients with complex care needs as they force healthcare systems to prioritize structural constraints over individualized care, especially during unforeseen events outside regular hours. Such systemic inflexibility can compromise patient safety, increase the workload for HSCPs and strain resources. Organizational adaptability is crucial to managing the inherent variability of patient needs. Our proposed ‘safe care transition pathway’ addresses these issues, providing proactive strategies such as sharing knowledge and increasing patient participation, and strengthening the capacity of professionals to meet dynamic care needs, promoting safer care transitions. Conclusion: To promote patient safety in care transitions, strategies must go beyond inter‐professional collaboration, incorporating adaptability and flexible resource planning. The implementation of standardized safe care transition pathways, coupled with the active participation of patients and families, is crucial. These measures aim to create a resilient, person‐centred approach that may effectively manage the complexities in care transitions. Implications: The recommendations of this study span the spectrum from policy‐level changes aimed at strategic resource allocation and fostering inter‐professional collaboration to practical measures like effective communication, information technology integration, patient participation and family involvement. Together, the recommendations offer a holistic approach to enhance care transitions and, ultimately, patient outcomes. Reporting Method: Findings are reported per the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative research (COREQ). Patient or Public Contribution: No patient or public contribution.

Aim: The aim was to illuminate how nurses experience person-centred care planning using video conferencing upon hospital discharge of frail older persons. Design: Care planning via video conferencing requires collaboration, communication and information transfer between involved parties, both with regard to preparing and conducting meetings. Participation of involved parties is required to achieve a collaborative effort, but the responsibilities and roles of the involved professions are unclear, despite the existence of regulations. Method: A qualitative content analysis was conducted based on 11 individual semi-structured interviews with nurses from hospitals, municipalities and primary care in Sweden. Results: This study provides valuable insights into challenges associated with care planning via video conferencing. The meeting format, that is video conferencing, is perceived as a barrier that makes the interaction challenging. Shortcomings in video technology make a person-centred approach difficult. The person-centred approach is also difficult for nurses to maintain when the older person or relatives are not involved in the planning.

Aim: To explore frontline decision‐making, adaptation, and learning in ambulance care during the evolving COVID‐19 pandemic. Design: Descriptive and interpretative qualitative study. Methods: Twenty‐eight registered nurses from the Swedish ambulance services described 56 critical incidents during the COVID‐19 pandemic through free‐text questionnaires. The material was analysed using the Critical Incident Technique and Interpretive Description through the lens of potential for resilient performance. Results: The findings were synthesized into four themes: ‘Navigating uncharted waters under never‐ending pressure’, ‘Balancing on the brink of an abyss’, ‘Sacrificing the few to save the many’ and ‘Bracing for the next wave’. Frontline decision‐making during a pandemic contribute to ethical dilemmas while necessitating difficult prioritizations to adapt and respond to limited resources. Learning was manifested through effective information sharing and the identification of successful adaptations as compared to maladaptations. Conclusions: During pandemics or under other extreme conditions, decisions must be made promptly, even amidst emerging chaos, potentially necessitating the use of untested methods and ad‐hoc solutions due to initial lack of knowledge and guidelines. Within ambulance care, dynamic leadership becomes imperative, combining autonomous frontline decision‐making with support from management. Strengthening ethical competence and fostering ethical discourse may enhance confidence in decision‐making, particularly under ethically challenging circumstances. Impact: Performance under extreme conditions can elevate the risk of suboptimal decision‐making and adverse outcomes, with older adults being especially vulnerable. Thus, requiring targeted decision support and interventions. Enhancing patient safety in ambulance care during such conditions demands active participation and governance from management, along with decision support and guidelines. Vertical communication and collaboration between management and frontline professionals are essential to ensure that critical information, guidelines, and resources are effectively disseminated and implemented. Further research is needed into management and leadership in ambulance care, alongside the ethical challenges in frontline decision‐making under extreme conditions. Reporting Method: Findings are reported per consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ). Patient or Public Contribution: No Patient or Public Contribution.

Background: Coordinated, multidisciplinary care is essential when addressing the complex needs of an aging population, with prehospital emergency care providers often serving as a common point of contact. Addressing complex care needs while maintaining continuity of care necessitates seamless collaboration between diverse healthcare providers. Despite this, there is limited research on interprofessional collaboration in prehospital care of older patients with complex needs. Understanding what influences interprofessional collaboration and identifying areas for improvement are vital for optimizing prehospital care for this vulnerable population. This study aimed to explore ambulance clinicians' perspectives on interprofessional collaboration in prehospital emergency care for older patients with complex care needs and to identify key factors influencing collaboration. Methods: An explanatory sequential mixed-methods design was employed in this study, conducted in southern Sweden. In Phase 1, quantitative data were collected via an online survey completed by 118 ambulance clinicians (ACs). Descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and Kruskal–Wallis tests were used to analyze the data. Qualitative responses were analyzed through inductive content analysis, informing the development of an interview guide. In Phase 2, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 ACs and analyzed using inductive content analysis. Findings from both phases were integrated using a joint-display matrix, combining quantitative patterns with qualitative insights for a comprehensive interpretation. Results: Quantitative findings revealed that although collaboration with patients' families and care staff was generally rated as satisfactory by ACs, significant challenges were reported in coordinating care with other healthcare actors, especially home care nurses. About 89% of respondents reported insufficient access to patient information, highlighting difficulties in retrieving such information. Qualitative data underscored the importance of comprehensive patient information for effective decision-making and alignment with patient preferences and care goals. The integrated analysis identified three key factors influencing interprofessional collaboration: defined goals of care, access to information, and clarity in roles and responsibilities. Challenges in maintaining continuity and responsiveness, particularly during night shifts, were emphasized as barriers to effective collaboration. Conclusion: Addressing deficiencies in nighttime care coordination, improving access to comprehensive patient information, and strengthening communication pathways between healthcare providers are essential steps in improving interprofessional collaboration to strengthen prehospital care of older patients with complex care needs.