Background: There is a strong rational of using anti–programmed cell death protein-1 and its ligand (anti–PD-1/L1) antibodies in human papillomavirus (HPV)–induced cancers. However, anti–PD-1/L1 as monotherapy induces a limited number of objective responses. The development of novel combinations in order to improve the clinical efficacy of an anti–PD-1/L1 is therefore of interest. Combining anti–PD-1/L1 therapy with an antitumor vaccine seems promising in HPV-positive (+) cancers. UCPVax is a therapeutic cancer vaccine composed of two separate peptides derived from telomerase (hTERT, human telomerase reverse transcriptase). UCPVax is being evaluated in a multicenter phase I/II study in NSCLC (non–small cell lung cancer) and has demonstrated to be safe and immunogenic. The aim of the VolATIL study is to evaluate the combination of atezolizumab (an anti-PD-L1) and UCPVax vaccine in a multicenter phase II study in patients with HPV⁺ cancers.Methods: Patients with HPV⁺ cancer (anal canal, head and neck, and cervical or vulvar), at locally advanced or metastatic stage, and refractory to at least one line of systemic chemotherapy are eligible. The primary end point is the objective response rate (ORR) at 4 months. Patients will receive atezolizumab every 3 weeks at a fixed dose of 1,200 mg in combination with the UCPVax vaccine at 1 mg subcutaneously.Discussion: Anti-cancer vaccines can restore cancer-immunity via the expansion and activation of tumor-specific T cells in patients lacking pre-existing anti-tumor responses. Moreover, preclinical data showed that specific T_H1 CD4 T cells sustain the quality and homing of an antigen-specific CD8⁺ T-cell immunity. In previous clinical studies, the induction of anti-hTERT immunity was significantly correlated to survival in patients with advanced squamous anal cell carcinoma. Thus, there is a strong rational to combine an anti-cancer hTERT vaccine and an immune checkpoint inhibitor to activate and promote antitumor T-cell immunity. This pivotal proof of concept study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of a telomerase-based T_H1 inducing vaccine (UCPVax) and an anti–PD-L1 (atezolizumab) immunotherapy in HPV⁺ cancers, as well as confirming their synergic mechanism, and settling the basis for a new combination for future clinical trials.Clinical Trial Registration: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/, identifier NCT03946358.

IntroductionGastrointestinal stromal tumors represent the most frequently encountered primary mesenchymal tumors. Whereas the liver and the peritoneum are known to be the preferential metastasis sites, no therapeutic standard has yet been established for the management of bone metastases because of their very low incidence. We report a unique example of a single humerus metastasis of a jejunal gastrointestinal stromal tumor.Case presentationWe report the case of a 72-year-old European woman whose jejunal gastrointestinal stromal tumor was resected in 2013 and treated during the following 3 years with imatinib (400 mg daily). In 2018, she developed a single humeral bone lesion that was identified as a gastrointestinal stromal tumor metastasis. After 7 months of imatinib intake, reconstructive surgery was performed. Pathologists confirmed the satisfactory histological regression and assessed the complete tumor resection. The patient is still on imatinib maintenance therapy, with no recurrence reported so far. She fully recovered the upper limb function after following an appropriate rehabilitation program.DiscussionCurrent literature and published case reports indicate that bones are one of the rarest locations of gastrointestinal stromal tumor metastasis (about 1%), with occurrence mainly in the spine. Patients initially diagnosed with gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the small intestine and stomach are more likely to suffer from bone metastasis, compared with other gastrointestinal stromal tumor locations. The median overall survival rate is higher for patients with isolated bone metastasis compared with those having liver metastasis. Metastasis occurs on average 4 years after the primary, but it may take up to 20 years, emphasizing the need for long-term clinical and radiological monitoring. Although specific guidelines for such cases have not yet been established, we suggest that a multimodal concerted approach involving surgery or radiotherapy associated with tyrosine kinase inhibitor intake should be considered.ConclusionBones are one of the rarest locations of gastrointestinal stromal tumor metastasis. A multidisciplinary collaboration was set up to allow conservative surgery of our patient after several months of imatinib treatment. A year and a half later, the patient is still in complete remission. This specific case supports the concept of an intermediate stage between local and oligometastatic disease that should be managed with a curative aim, as much as possible.

Purpose: ctDNA may offer a noninvasive means to evaluate tumor response and anticipate disease dynamics before radiologic changes in advanced endometrial carcinoma. Experimental Design: This ancillary analysis included patients from the multicenter, randomized, phase II GINECO-UTerin OLAparib (UTOLA) trial (NCT03745950) evaluating olaparib/placebo as maintenance after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Plasma samples were collected at screening after chemotherapy (baseline), 3 months (M3), and progression. ctDNA detection was assessed by a validated methylation-based Droplet Digital PCR (MethddPCR) assay targeting DNA positions universally methylated in endometrial carcinoma. Results: Among 130 evaluable patients, ctDNA was detected in 25 of 129 (19%, 1 technical fail) at baseline, 15 of 80 (19%) at M3, and 33 of 52 (63%) at progression. Baseline ctDNA positivity was independently associated with poorer progression-free survival (PFS) [median 1.81 vs. 7.39 months; adjusted HR = 5.33 (3.17–8.97)] and overall survival (OS) [10.3 vs. 24.7 months; adjusted HR = 3.98 (2.28–6.91); adjusted for age, stage IV at diagnosis, p53abn subgroup, and residual measurable lesions after chemotherapy]. Patients with baseline ctDNA had median OS of 9.36 months under olaparib versus 19.6 months under placebo (log-rank P = 0.05). Patients with increasing ctDNA at M3 had median PFS of 1.67 months, versus 9.64 months without, and median OS of 18.8 versus 25.8 months. ctDNA rising was predictive of poor postprogression OS under olaparib but not under placebo (interaction test, P < 0.001). Conclusions: MethddPCR-ctDNA is an independent prognostic biomarker for OS in advanced/metastatic endometrial carcinoma. MethddPCR-ctDNA may identify patients unlikely to benefit from PARP inhibition, guide therapeutic decisions, and should be further evaluated as a new stratification parameter in future endometrial carcinoma trials.

Purpose: Aromatase inhibitors (AI) are used to treat estrogen receptor (ER)–positive low-grade endometrioid endometrial cancer. In breast cancer, ESR1 mutations are rare at diagnosis (<5%) but are frequently acquired in AI-resistant cases and are considered one of the major resistance mechanisms to endocrine therapy. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of ESR1 mutations in hormonotherapy-naïve endometrial cancer samples and correlate them with molecular profiles, ER expression, and clinical outcomes. Experimental Design: A total of 147 patients with advanced endometrial cancer who had responded to first-line chemotherapy were recruited into the UTOLA trial. Archival endometrial cancer tumor tissues underwent sequencing of 127 genes, including ESR1. Only hotspot mutations in the ligand-binding domain were evaluated. ESR1 mutation prevalence was validated in the Genomics England dataset. In UTOLA, tumors were classified as POLE, MMR deficient, TP53abn, or no specific molecular profiles (NSMP) based on the Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial Cancer (PROMISE) classification. Results: Of 147 patients, 137 had sufficient tumor material for sequencing. ESR1 mutations were identified in eight tumors (6%), including Y537S/C/N (n = 4), L536H/P (n = 2), and E380Q (n = 2). A similar prevalence (3.5%) was found among 1,311 tumors in the Genomics England dataset. All ESR1 mutation cases were low-grade endometrioid endometrial cancer, ER-positive, and PR-positive, and classified as NSMP. Among patients with metastatic NSMP low-grade endometrioid endometrial cancer, 22% (8/37) harbored ESR1 mutations. Survival outcomes after platinum chemotherapy were similar between patients with ESR1 mutation endometrial cancer and ESR1 wild type (median, not reached vs. 25.3 months; P = 0.114). Conclusions: ESR1 mutations, while rare overall in treatment-naïve endometrial cancer, are more prevalent in patients with NSMP low-grade endometrioid endometrial cancer, potentially affecting AI efficacy. ESR1 status should be considered in selecting hormonotherapy and as a stratification factor in AI trials.