Pei-Tzu Chen

Dr. Pei-Tzu Chen

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

2Years (2025-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications

18 April 2025 in Journal of the Formosan Medical Association
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PCPei-Tzu Chen
Pei-Tzu Chen
WCWu-Chien Chien
Wu-Chien Chien
CCChi-Hsiang Chung
Chi-Hsiang Chung
PCPeng-Jen Chen
Peng-Jen Chen
THTien-Yu Huang
Tien-Yu Huang
HCHsuan-Wei Chen
Hsuan-Wei Chen
Bile acids are carcinogens causing mutations leading to colorectal cancer (CRC). Higher total bile acid concentrations in the serum of patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), compared to healthy controls, have been reported in previous studies. However, the association between PBC and the risk for CRC remains controversial. We investigated the association between PBC and the development of colonic polyps leading to CRC overall in this study. The study enrolled 1,936,512 individuals from the Longitudinal Health Insurance Database spanning 2000 to 2017 for cohort analysis. Individuals assigned to ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM codes representing PBC were incorporated. A 1:4 control cohort was randomly selected. After adjusting for CRC risk factors using Cox regression analysis, we calculated the hazard ratios for developing colon polyps and CRC in PBC patients compared to the general population. Within the study cohort, consisting of 2024 individuals meeting the inclusion criteria, 199 patients developed colon polyps or CRC. In contrast, among the 8096 individuals in the comparison cohort, 650 cases of colon polyps or CRC were observed during the 17-year-follow-up period. According to Cox regression analysis, the adjusted hazard ratio indicated that the risk was 1.678 times higher in the PBC group compared to the comparison group. This population-based retrospective cohort study identified a 1.68-fold increased risk of colon polyps and CRC in patients with PBC, suggesting a potential association with colonic neoplasia. Further research is warranted to evaluate the role of endoscopic surveillance in patients with PBC.



27 January 2026 in Diagnostics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TCTe Jung Chuang
Te Jung Chuang
PCPei-Tzu Chen
Pei-Tzu Chen
JLJung-Chun Lin
Jung-Chun Lin
HCHsuan-Wei Chen
Hsuan-Wei Chen
Background/Objectives: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) has become the standard for diagnosing solid pancreatic masses (SPMs). However, in the absence of rapid on-site cytopathologic evaluation (ROSE), the optimal number of needle passes remains uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of EUS-FNB using a gross-eyed evaluation with the fanning technique in patients with pancreatic malignancy. Methods: This retrospective single-center study included 140 patients with confirmed pancreatic malignancy who underwent EUS-FNB with at least three needle passes between January 2022 and December 2025. Gross-eyed visual inspection for whitish core tissue was used to assess the specimen adequacy. The primary outcome was the diagnostic rate of malignancy. The secondary outcomes included the tissue adequacy and yield rate of malignancy. Results: The diagnostic rate of malignancy improved with additional passes, 72.1% for one pass, 82.9% for two, and 90.7% for three. However, the gain beyond two passes was marginal. The tissue adequacy was high across all passes (≥94.3%), with most samples deemed adequate within two passes. The yield rate of malignancy similarly improved from 82.1% (one pass) to 91.4% (three passes). No adverse events were reported. Gross-eyed evaluation was feasible in all cases and guided effective sampling. Conclusions: EUS-FNB with two puncture numbers and the fanning technique achieves high diagnostic performance for pancreatic malignancy without the need for ROSE and MOSE. Two passes appear sufficient in most cases, supporting a simplified and safe approach that minimizes unnecessary needle passes.