The purpose of the present study was to determine the cortical structures involved with integrated baroreceptor‐mediated modulation of autonomic cardiovascular function in conscious humans independent of changes in arterial blood pressure. We assessed the brain regions associated with lower body negative pressure (LBNP)‐induced baroreflex control using functional magnetic resonance imaging with blood oxygen level‐dependent (BOLD) contrast in eight healthy male volunteer subjects. The levels of LBNP administered were 5, 15 and 35 mmHg. Heart rate (HR; representing the cardiovascular response) and LBNP (representing the baroreceptor activation level) were simultaneously monitored during the scanning period. In addition, estimated central venous pressure (CVP), arterial blood pressure (ABP) and muscle sympathetic nerve activity were recorded on a separate session. Random effects analyses (SPM2) were used to evaluate significant (P< 0.05) BOLD signal changes that correlated separately with both LBNP and HR (15‐ and 35‐mmHgversus5‐mmHg LBNP). Compared to baseline, steady‐state LBNP at 15 and 35 mmHg decreased CVP (from 7 ± 1 to 5 ± 1 and 4 ± 1 mmHg, respectively) and increased MSNA (from 12 ± 1 to 23 ± 3 and 36 ± 4 bursts min−1, respectively, bothP< 0.05versusbaseline). Furthermore, steady‐state LBNP elevated HR from 54 ± 2 beats min−1at baseline to 64 ± 2 beats min−1at 35‐mmHg suction. Both mean arterial and pulse pressure were not different between rest and any level of LBNP. Cortical regions demonstrating increased activity that correlated with higher HR and greater LBNP included the right superior posterior insula, frontoparietal cortex and the left cerebellum. Conversely, using the identical statistical paradigm, bilateral anterior insular cortices, the right anterior cingulate, orbitofrontal cortex, amygdala, midbrain and mediodorsal nucleus of the thalamus showed decreased neural activation. These data corroborate previous investigations highlighting the involved roles of the insula, anterior cingulate cortex and amygdala in central autonomic cardiovascular control. In addition, we have provided the first evidence for the identification of the cortical network involved specifically with baroreflex‐mediated autonomic cardiovascular function in conscious humans.
1 November 2001 in American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
We tested the hypothesis that differences in sympathetic reflex responses to head-up tilt (HUT) between males ( n = 9) and females ( n = 8) were associated with decrements in postural vasomotor responses in women. Muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA; microneurography), heart rate, stroke volume (SV; Doppler), and blood pressure (Finapres) were measured during a progressive HUT protocol (5 min at each of supine, 20°, 40°, and 60°). MSNA and hemodynamic responses were also measured during the cold pressor test (CPT) to examine nonbaroreflex neurovascular control. SV was normalized to body surface area (SVi) to calculate the index of cardiac output (Qi), and total peripheral resistance (TPR). During HUT, heart rate increased more in females versus males ( P < 0.001) and SVi and Qi decreased similarly in both groups. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) increased to a lesser extent in females versus males in the HUT ( P < 0.01) but increases in TPR during HUT were similar. MSNA burst frequency was lower in females versus males in supine ( P < 0.03) but increased similarly during HUT. Average amplitude/burst increased in 60° HUT for males but not females. Both males and females demonstrated an increase in MAP as well as MSNA burst frequency, mean burst amplitude, and total MSNA during the CPT. However, compared with females, males demonstrated a greater neural response (ΔTotal MSNA) due to a larger increase in mean burst amplitude ( P < 0.05). Therefore, these data point to gender-specific autonomic responses to cardiovascular stress. The different MSNA response to postural stress between genders may contribute importantly to decrements in blood pressure control during HUT in females.
Obstructive apnea during sleep elevates the set point for efferent sympathetic outflow during wakefulness. Such resetting is attributed to hypoxia-induced upregulation of peripheral chemoreceptor and brain stem sympathetic function. Whether recurrent arousal from sleep also influences daytime muscle sympathetic nerve activity is unknown. We therefore tested, in a cohort of 48 primarily nonsleepy, middle-aged, male (30) and female (18) volunteers (age: 59±1 years, mean±SE), the hypothesis that the frequency of arousals from sleep (arousal index) would relate to daytime muscle sympathetic burst incidence, independently of the frequency of apnea or its severity. Polysomnography identified 24 as having either no or mild obstructive sleep apnea (apnea–hypopnea index 15 events/h). Burst incidence correlated significantly with arousal index ( r =0.53; P <0.001), minimum oxygen saturation ( r =−0.43; P =0.002), apnea–hypopnea index ( r =0.41; P =0.004), age ( r =0.36; P =0.013), and body mass index ( r =0.33; P =0.022) but not with oxygen desaturation index ( r =0.28; P =0.056). Arousal index was the single strongest predictor of muscle sympathetic nerve activity burst incidence, present in all best subsets regression models. The model with the highest adjusted R2 (0.456) incorporated arousal index, minimum oxygen saturation, age, body mass index, and oxygen desaturation index but not apnea–hypopnea index. An apnea- and hypoxia-independent effect of sleep fragmentation on sympathetic discharge during wakefulness could contribute to intersubject variability, age-related increases in muscle sympathetic nerve activity, associations between sleep deprivation and insulin resistance or insomnia and future cardiovascular events, and residual adrenergic risk with persistence of hypertension should therapy eliminate obstructive apneas but not arousals.
In cardiovascular research, sex and gender have not typically been considered in research design and reporting until recently. This has resulted in clinical research findings from which not only all women, but also gender-diverse individuals have been excluded. The resulting dearth of data has led to a lack of sex- and gender-specific clinical guidelines and raises serious questions about evidence-based care. Basic research has also excluded considerations of sex. Including sex and/or gender as research variables not only has the potential to improve the health of society overall now, but it also provides a foundation of knowledge on which to build future advances. The goal of this guidelines article is to provide advice on best practices to include sex and gender considerations in study design, as well as data collection, analysis, and interpretation to optimally establish rigor and reproducibility needed to inform clinical decision-making and improve outcomes. In cardiovascular physiology, incorporating sex and gender is a necessary component when optimally designing and executing research plans. The guidelines serve as the first guidance on how to include sex and gender in cardiovascular research. We provide here a beginning path toward achieving this goal and improve the ability of the research community to interpret results through a sex and gender lens to enable comparison across studies and laboratories, resulting in better health for all.