Lioba Bürvenich

Dr. Lioba Bürvenich

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

1Year (2026-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SWSebastian G. Walter
Sebastian G. Walter
JSJoline S. Schwan
Joline S. Schwan
TAThaer Ali
Thaer Ali
LBLioba Bürvenich
Lioba Bürvenich
VHVincent Heck
Vincent Heck
NKNikolaus Kernich
Nikolaus Kernich
Background: The rising incidence of vertebral body fractures, vertebral infections and metastatic disease increases the need for diagnostic modalities with high specificity. Biopsy remains essential, yet comparative data on CT-guided versus intraoperative percutaneous fluoroscopy-guided biopsy are limited. Methods: This retrospective study compared two cohorts biopsied for spinal lesions between April 2015 and April 2024: CT-guided biopsy (n = 62), and intraoperative percutaneous biopsy (n = 154). Groups were analyzed for demographic and clinical characteristics, and diagnostic yield was defined by the conclusiveness of the primary biopsy; statistical comparisons were performed using Fisher’s exact test. Results: CT-guided biopsy yielded conclusive results in 46 of 62 cases (74.2%), whereas intraoperative, fluoroscopy-guided biopsy was conclusive in 41 of 154 cases (26.6%), representing a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001). In analogy, propensity score matching (1:1) resulted in similar significant (p < 0.001) results (CT-guided group vs. intraoperative, fluoroscopy-guided group: 86.7% vs. 35.6%) Conclusions: CT-guided biopsy demonstrated a substantially higher rate of conclusive results compared with intraoperative biopsy in this cohort. Further studies with larger and more balanced cohorts are needed to strengthen clinical recommendations.

5 November 2026 in Preprints.org
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
MTMichael Topalian
Michael Topalian
RZRana Zgheib
Rana Zgheib
SHSouheil Hallit
Souheil Hallit
Frank A. SchildbergFrank A. Schildberg
Frank A. Schildberg
JRJonas Roos
Jonas Roos
EAElio Assaf
Elio Assaf
Background/Objectives: Vertebral fractures (VFs) often remain clinically unrecognized. We estimated the prevalence of previously unrecognized VFs among older adults presenting with major nonvertebral fragility fractures and explored associated clinical characteristics. Methods: This single-center prospective observational study enrolled 49 consecutive patients aged ≥60 years presenting with low-energy proximal femur, proximal humerus, or distal radius fractures between January 2023 and January 2024. Standardized thoracolumbar radiographs were evaluated using a combined modified algorithm-based qualitative and Genant semiquantitative approach. FRAX probabilities were calculated without bone mineral density. Associations were examined in exploratory unadjusted analyses. Results: Previously unrecognized VFs were found in 22/49 patients (44.9%; Wilson 95% CI, 31.9–58.7%), comprising 34 fractures. The most frequently affected levels were L2 (10/34) and T12 (8/34). A prior fracture history was associated with newly detected VFs in exploratory analysis (p = 0.002). Mean FRAX major osteoporotic fracture probability without bone mineral density was 16.66 ± 10.59% in patients with and 9.72 ± 7.80% in those without a newly identified VF (mean difference 6.94 percentage points; 95% CI, 1.45–12.43; p = 0.011). Conclusions: Previously unrecognized VFs were frequent in this small, predominantly hip-fracture cohort. The findings suggest a potential diagnostic gap and justify larger studies assessing targeted vertebral imaging in secondary fracture prevention; they do not establish a benefit from universal screening.