With the aim of evaluating the effect of combining an antibiotic ionophore with plant extracts and probiotics on the productive efficiency (performance and carcass) during the last phase of lamb fattening, 24 Pelibuey × Katahdin male lambs (38.47 ± 3.92 kg, initial weight) were fed with a high-energy diet during for 56 days, and assigned, under a complete randomized block design experiment to one of the following supplement treatments: (1) 28 mg of monensin/kg diet DM supplemented alone (MON), (2) combination of MON plus 2 g/kg diet of a product contained Bacillus subtilis 2.2 × 10⁸ CFU kg diet DM (MON + BS), (3) combination of MON + BS plus 300 mg essential oils/kg diet DM (MON + BS + EO), and (4) BS alone. At the end of the feeding trial (56-d), lambs were slaughtered and carcass variables were measured. Compared to the rest of the treatments, combining MON with BS improved dietary NE by 3.4% and the efficiency of utilization of dietary energy consumed. Inclusion of EO in the MON + BS combination resulted in a similar average daily weight gain (ADG) and feed efficiency (GF) when compared with MON + BS, but showed a lower dietary net energy (NE), hot carcass weight, and dressing percentage. Lambs receiving BS alone showed greater average ADG and dry matter intake (DMI) than lambs receiving MON + BS + EO, but similar feed GF and dietary NE. There were no treatment effects on tissue composition, whole cut, or visceral organ mass. It was concluded that combining probiotics with the ionophore monensin can improve the efficiency of dietary energy utilization in the last phase of finishing. Probiotics supplemented alone result in greater ADG without a difference in dietary energy efficiency when compared with MON alone. Inclusion of EO in the MON + BS combination did not show advantages; on the contrary, it reduced carcass weight and dressing percentage. It is necessary to further research the potential complementary effects of combining diverse sources of natural additives with synthetic antibiotics.

Due to their specific properties, the autolyzed yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae (SC) and bacterial Bacillus subtilis (BS) theoretically can have a synergistic effect when combined and offered in ruminant diets. Thus, the aim of this experiment was to evaluate the effect of their combination as feed additives on growth performance, dietary energy, carcass traits, and visceral organ mass in finishing lambs. For this reason, 48 Pelibuey × Katahdin lambs (98 ± 17 d age; initial weight = 20.25 ± 3.37 kg) were used in a feeding trial lasting 83 d. Lambs were blocked by weight and assigned to 24 pens. Treatment consisted in supplementing a high-energy diet with probiotic and/or prebiotic as follows: (1) finishing diet without probiotic or prebiotic supplementation (Control), (2) finishing diet supplemented with 1.5 g SC/kg diet, (3) finishing diet supplemented with 1.5 g BS/kg diet, and (4) finishing diet supplemented with 1.5 g SC plus 1.5 g BS/kg diet. There were no synergistic (interaction) effects by combining SC + BS in any of the variables evaluated. Lambs that were supplemented with BS showed a very similar response on dry matter intake (DMI, p = 0.41), average daily gain (ADG, p = 0.64), carcass traits (p ≥ 0.08), tissue composition (p ≥ 0.32), and relative visceral organ mass (g/kg EBW, p ≥ 0.15) than non-supplemented lambs. Compared to the control group, lambs that received SC alone or in combination with BS showed greater average daily gain (12.0%, p = 0.03), gain efficiency (6.1%, p = 0.04) and observed-to expected dietary energy efficiency (5.5%, p = 0.04). Supplemental SC and SC + BS increased hot carcass weight (p = 0.04) without effects on the rest of the variables evaluated including the shoulder tissue composition whole cuts, and visceral organ mass. It was concluded that SC improves growth performance and dietary energy in finishing lambs without changes in carcass traits or carcass composition. Combining SC with BS did not improve the magnitude of the response of SC supplemented alone. In this study, the inclusion of a 1.5 g/kg diet of BS during a long-term period (83 d) did not show benefits to finishing lambs.

Leonardite (LEO), a microbial derived product rich in humic and fulvic acids, has been tested, due to its beneficial properties for health and well-being, as a feed additive, mainly in non-ruminant species. Although there are some reports of LEO supplementation in ruminants fed with high-to medium-forage based diets, there is no information available of the potential effects of LEO in ruminants fed, under sub-tropical climate conditions, with high-energy diets during long-term fattening. For this reason, the objective of the present experiment was to evaluate the effects of LEO levels inclusion in diets for feedlot lambs finished over a long-term period. For this reason, 48 Pelibuey × Katahdin lambs (initial weight = 20.09 ± 3.55 kg) were fed with a high-energy diet (88:12 concentrate to forage ratio) supplemented with LEO (with a minimum of 75% total humic acids) for 130 days as follows: (1) diet without LEO, (2) diet supplemented with 0.20% LEO, (3) diet supplemented with 0.40% LEO, and (4) diet supplemented with 0.60% LEO. For each treatment, Leonardite was incorporated with the mineral premix. Lambs were blocked by weight and housed in 24 pens (2 lambs/pen). Treatment effects were contrasted by orthogonal polynomials. The average climatic conditions that occurred during the experimental period were 31.6 ± 2.4 °C ambient temperature and 42.2 ± 8.1% relative humidity (RH). Those values of ambient temperature and RH represent a temperature humidity index (THI) of 79.07; thus, lambs were finished under high heat load conditions. The inclusion of LEO in diet did not affect dry matter intake (p ≥ 0.25) and average daily gain (p ≥ 0.21); therefore, feed to gain ratio was not affected (p ≥ 0.18). The observed to expected dietary net energy averaged 0.96 and was not affected by LEO inclusion (p ≥ 0.26). The lower efficiency (−4%) of dietary energy utilization is an expected response given the climatic conditions of high ambient heat load presented during fattening. Lambs that were slaughtered at an average weight of 49.15 ± 6.00 kg did not show differences on the variables measured for carcass traits (p ≥ 0.16), shoulder tissue composition (p ≥ 0.59), nor in visceral mass (p ≥ 0.46) by inclusion of LEO. Under the climatic conditions in which this experiment was carried out, LEO supplementation up to 0.60% in diet (equivalent to 0.45% of humic substances) did not did not help to alleviate the extra-energy expenditure used to dissipate the excessive heat and did not change the gained tissue composition of the lambs that were fed with high-energy diets during long-term period under sub-tropical climate conditions.

With the aim of evaluating the effects of combining a natural additive composed of a blend of essential oils plus vitamin D3 (EOD3) with Bacillus subtilis (BS) or with the antibiotic virginiamycin (VM) on growth-performance and carcass traits of finishing lambs subjected to high ambient heat load, 48 intact male lambs (initial weight = 33.71 ± 3.21 kg) were used in a feeding trial lasting 61 d. Treatments consisted of supplementing (as a feed basis) a total mixing finishing diet (90:10 concentrate-to-forage ratio) as follows: (1) without feed additives (Control); (2) supplemented with EOD3 (a blend of 100 mg essential oils plus 0.10 mg vitamin D3/kg diet); (3) diet supplemented with EOD3 plus 2 g Bacillus subtilis PB6/kg diet to provide 2.2 × 10⁸ CFU (EOD3+BS); and (4) basal diet supplemented with EOD3 plus 25 mg virginiamycin/kg diet (EOD3+VM). The temperature–humidity index (THI) during the experiment averaged 82.52 ± 1.10. Compared to non-supplemented lambs, lambs that received EOD3 alone showed greater (p < 0.03) average daily gain (ADG; 15.3%), gain-to-feed ratio (GF; 12.3%), and observed-to-expected dietary NE ratio (5.9%). The combination of EOD3 with BS resulted in identical ADG but a numerically larger DMI (7.1%, p = 0.087) than the EOD3 treatment, leading to lower (p = 0.024) GF and a lower (p < 0.01) observed-to-expected dietary NE ratio. In contrast to our expectation, combining VM and EOD3 did not increase growth response (p = 0.69), GF (p = 0.49), or dietary energy utilization efficiency (p = 0.09) when compared to EOD3 alone. Because the lambs that received supplemental EOD3 alone and their combinations showed greater final weight, hot carcass weight was heavier than in controls; however, no effects were observed on the other carcass variables evaluated, including whole cuts and shoulder tissue composition. Lambs that received EOD3 and their combinations showed a lower relative intestinal mass than controls (p < 0.04). This result confirms the role of EOD3 as a tool to minimize the negative impact of high ambient temperature on the performance of fattening lambs. Combining EOD3 with Bacillus subtilis or with VM did not improve energy utilization efficiency or carcass traits compared with EOD3 supplementation alone in lambs fattening under high ambient heat load. Further research is needed to better understand the interactions among different additives and to propose more effective supplementation strategies in animals subjected to different environmental conditions.