Volodimir Sarabeev

Dr. Volodimir Sarabeev

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2012 in Parasitology International
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
IBIsabel Blasco-Costa
Isabel Blasco-Costa
RMRaúl Míguez-Lozano
Raúl Míguez-Lozano
VSVolodimir Sarabeev
Volodimir Sarabeev
JBJuan Antonio Balbuena
Juan Antonio Balbuena

1 February 2014 in Parasitology International
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
VSVolodimir Sarabeev
Volodimir Sarabeev
YDYves Desdevises
Yves Desdevises

17 January 2020 in Ecography
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CLCristina Llopis‐Belenguer
Cristina Llopis‐Belenguer
IBIsabel Blasco‐Costa
Isabel Blasco‐Costa
JBJuan Antonio Balbuena
Juan Antonio Balbuena
VSVolodimir Sarabeev
Volodimir Sarabeev
DSDaniel B. Stouffer
Daniel B. Stouffer
Parasites are often key players in biological invasions since they can mediate the impact of host invasions or can themselves become invasive species. However, the nature and extent of parasite‐mediated invasions are often difficult to delineate. Here, we used individual‐based, weighted bipartite networks to study the roles (degrees of interactions of individuals in a modular network according to their within‐ and among‐module connections) played by native and invasive host individuals to their parasite communities. We studied two phylogenetically and ecologically close fish species, Mugil cephalus s.l. and Planiliza haematocheilus (Teleostei: Mugilidae). Planiliza haematocheilus is native to the Sea of Japan and invasive in the Sea of Azov whereas, M. cephalus s.l. is native to both seas. Based on the common evolutionary history that drives native host–parasite networks, we hypothesised that 1) native networks have higher modularity than invaded ones; and 2) invasive hosts in the invaded area play a peripheral role to structure parasite communities. We analysed the whole parasite community and subsets based on transmission strategy and host specificity of the parasite species to establish whether modularity and host roles are related to these features in the native and invaded areas. All networks were found to be modular. However, modularity tended to be higher in networks of the native area rather than those of the invaded area. Host individuals of both fish species played similar roles in the native area, whereas invasive hosts played a peripheral role in the networks of the invaded area. We propose that long‐term monitoring of the roles of invasive hosts in parasite communities can be a useful proxy for estimating the maturity of the establishment of the invasive hosts in an ecosystem.

1 June 2006 in Journal of Parasitology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NRNataliya Yu Rubtsova
Nataliya Yu Rubtsova
JBJuan A. Balbuena
Juan A. Balbuena
VSVolodimir Sarabeev
Volodimir Sarabeev
IBIsabel Blasco-Costa
Isabel Blasco-Costa
LELouis Euzet
Louis Euzet
A comparative morphological study of specimens of Ligophorus spp. from Mugil cephalus in western Mediterranean and the Black Sea localities has been carried out, indicating the presence of 2 distinct forms, i.e., Ligophorus chabaudi and Ligophorus cephali n. sp. A detailed description of the latter and an up-to-date redescription of L. chabaudi are provided. The existence of these 2 morphological species was additionally supported by principal component analysis based on 19 metric characters of 87 specimens arranged in samples defined by parasite species and geographical locality. The analysis indicated consistent differences between species but not between localities; this pattern was well supported by jackknife procedures. Linear discriminant analyses showed that the main metric differences between the 2 species were attributable to the lengths of the dorsal and ventral bars and to the uncinulus length; use of the first 2 variables was enough to allocate all specimens studied to either form. The erection of L. cephali n. sp. raises the number of sympatric Mediterranean species of Ligophorus on M. cephalus to 3. The known geographical ranges of these species are compared.

27 January 2018 in Helminthologia
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SSS. Shvydka
S. Shvydka
VSVolodimir Sarabeev
Volodimir Sarabeev
VEV. D. Estruch
V. D. Estruch
CCC. Cadarso-Suárez
C. Cadarso-Suárez
Summary: To reach ethically and scientifically valid mean abundance values in parasitological and epidemiological studies this paper considers analytic and simulation approaches for sample size determination. The sample size estimation was carried out by applying mathematical formula with predetermined precision level and parameter of the negative binomial distribution estimated from the empirical data. A simulation approach to optimum sample size determination aimed at the estimation of true value of the mean abundance and its confidence interval (CI) was based on the Bag of Little Bootstraps (BLB). The abundance of two species of monogenean parasitesLigophorus cephaliandL. mediterraneusfromMugil cephalusacross the Azov-Black Seas localities were subjected to the analysis. The dispersion pattern of both helminth species could be characterized as a highly aggregated distribution with the variance being substantially larger than the mean abundance. The holistic approach applied here offers a wide range of appropriate methods in searching for the optimum sample size and the understanding about the expected precision level of the mean. Given the superior performance of the BLB relative to formulae with its few assumptions, the bootstrap procedure is the preferred method. Two important assessments were performed in the present study: i) based onCIs width a reasonable precision level for the mean abundance in parasitological surveys ofLigophorusspp. could be chosen between 0.8 and 0.5 with 1.6 and 1x mean of theCIs width, and ii) the sample size equal 80 or more host individuals allows accurate and precise estimation of mean abundance. Meanwhile for the host sample size in range between 25 and 40 individuals, the median estimates showed minimal bias but the sampling distribution skewed to the low values; a sample size of 10 host individuals yielded to unreliable estimates.