Background Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is the treatment of choice for patients with acute and chronic coronary syndromes as it reduces mortality and prevents recurrent thrombotic complications. The assessment of both ischaemic burden and bleeding risk is crucial in deciding which DAPT to choose and how long it should be continued. Objectives The aim of our study was to perform prospective clinical follow-up of patients receiving fixed-dose combination therapy (ASA 75 mg + clopidogrel 75 mg). Our study is a multicentric, cross-sectional, observational, cohort study. Methods A total of 1500 patients who were started on fixed-dose combination DAPT for acute or chronic coronary syndrome were included in the study. Primary endpoints were hospitalization for any reason, hospitalization for cardiovascular cause, acute myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, target vessel revascularization and bleeding; the secondary endpoints were death for any reason or cardiovascular cause and stroke. The significance level adopted in the statistical analysis was 5%. Results Median age was 63 years; 78.5% of the patients were receiving DAPT treatment for acute coronary syndrome. The rates of hospitalization for cardiovascular reasons, acute myocardial infartion, stent thrombosis and target-vessel revascularization were 7.9%, 2.3%, 1.3% and 4.2%, respectively. While the rate of BARC type 1 bleeding was 3.3%, the rate of BARC type 5, 3, or 2 bleeding was 0.6%. The secondary endpoints which were death from any cause, cardiovascular death and stroke were 0.5%, 0.3% and 0.3%, respectively. Conclusion: Our study shows that fixed-dose combination therapy is effective and safe in appropriately selected patients with acute or chronic coronary syndromes.

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common arrhythmia in patients with atrial septal defect (ASD). Cryoballoon ablation (CA) is a safe and efficient method for pulmonary vein (PV) isolation in the treatment of AF. Achieving left atrial access may be difficult in patients with atrial septal occluders (ASO) or surgical repair of ASD. The aim of this study was to present our experience with the efficacy and safety of transseptal puncture and AF ablation in CA in this subset of patients. Methods: We retrieved our data about patients with ASO or surgical repair of ASD undergoing cryoballoon AF ablation procedures at our center between August 2019 and January 2022. Results: Nine patients (age 43.88 ± 9.73 years) with AF (5 paroxysmal and 4 persistent) and ASO or surgical repair of ASD were enrolled. All three patients had a 28 mm Amplatzer ASO device which occupied the whole septum, and direct puncture through the ASO was performed. Sequential balloon dilatation was performed in 2 patients with surgical ASD repair and all 3 patients with ASO. Four of 6 patients (66.7%) in the surgical repair group required transesophageal echocardiography during transseptal puncture. The endpoint of the procedure, isolation of all PVs, was achieved in all 9 patients. None of the patients had evidence of an interatrial shunt or pericardial effusion at the end of the procedure. Total procedural time (123 ± 28 minutes vs. 63 ± 21 minutes, P = .024) and total fluoroscopy time (41 ± 5 minutes vs. 23 ± 8 minutes, P = .024) were significantly higher in the percutaneous closure group. Conclusions: In patients with ASO or surgical repair of ASD, CA of AF might be feasible, safe, and effective. The balloon dilatation of the interatrial septum (IAS) might assist transseptal access through the ASO or a surgically repaired thickened IAS.

Objective: The main objective of this study is to determine the incidence and predictors of clinical outcomes in patients with AF treated with factor Xa inhibitors in a real‐world setting.Methods: The present study was a multicentre and observational study that included patients with AF who were treated with factor Xa inhibitors. The primary outcome was the composite of ischemic stroke, TIA, systemic embolism, major bleeding, and all‐cause mortality.Results: A total of 1162 patients from 26 cardiology centers were included in this study, with a median age of 72 years. During the median 12‐month follow‐up period, the primary outcome occurred in 195 patients (16.8%). Treatment with rivaroxaban compared with apixaban and edoxaban showed a lower rate of ischemic stroke, TIA, and/or systemic embolism (2.2% vs. 4.7% vs. 6.5%, respectively, p = 0.014). The major bleeding rate was similar between all three factor Xa inhibitors. The all‐cause mortality rate in the rivaroxaban group was lower compared with the apixaban and edoxaban groups (9.8% vs. 15.1% vs. 12.4%, respectively, p = 0.042). Overall, the frequency of primary outcome was 13.8%, 19.6%, and 20.6% for patients treated with rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban, respectively (p = 0.019). Older age, male sex, low body weight, high bleeding risk, heart failure, hypertension, liver failure, and treatment with apixaban 2.5 mg b.i.d. were independently associated with the development of primary outcome.Conclusion: The follow‐up data from the ANATOLIA‐AF study provides detailed data about the incidence and independent predictors of adverse clinical outcomes in patients with AF treated with factor Xa inhibitor treatment.