Biological wastewater treatment processes such as activated sludge and anaerobic digestion remain the most favorable when compared to processes such as chemical precipitation and ion exchange due to their cost-effectiveness, eco-friendliness, ease of operation, and low maintenance. Since Abattoir Wastewater (AWW) is characterized as having high organic content, anaerobic digestion is slow and inadequate for complete removal of all nutrients and organic matter when required to produce a high-quality effluent that satisfies discharge standards. Multi-integrated systems can be designed in which additional stages are added before the anaerobic digester (pre-treatment), as well as after the digester (post-treatment) for nutrient recovery and pathogen removal. This can aid the water treatment plant effluent to meet the discharge regulations imposed by the legislator and allow the possibility for reuse on-site. This review aims to provide information on the principles of anaerobic digestion, aeration pre-treatment technology using enzymes and a hybrid membrane bioreactor, describing their various roles in AWW treatment. Simultaneous nitrification and denitrification are essential to add after anaerobic digestion for nutrient recovery utilizing a single step process. Nutrient recovery has become more favorable than nutrient removal in wastewater treatment because it consumes less energy, making the process cost-effective. In addition, recovered nutrients can be used to make nutrient-based fertilizers, reducing the effects of eutrophication and land degradation. The downflow expanded granular bed reactor is also compared to other high-rate anaerobic reactors, such as the up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) and the expanded granular sludge bed reactor (EGSB).

The feasibility of a biological (Ecoflush^TM) and/or electrocoagulation (EC) treatment system in removing chemical oxygen demand (COD) and fats, oils, and grease (FOG) from poultry slaughterhouse wastewater (PSW) were studied. The response surface methodology (RSM) was used to identify the optimum operating condition for EC and its integration with Ecoflush^TM as a pre-treatment for the removal of lipids. The optimum operating conditions were obtained at a pH of 3.05, a current density of 66.9 A/m², 74-min of treatment time, and without Ecoflush™. These conditions produced a high-quality clarified effluent after 92.4% COD reduction and 99% FOG reduction. The treatment with Ecoflush^TM only resulted in 85–99% FOG reduction, 20–50% COD reduction, and odourless effluent. However, the combination of both processes (Ecoflush^TM and EC) did not yield a significant difference (F test, p > 0.05) when compared to the performance of EC alone. Despite the low removal percentages of nitrogen and phosphorus, the present study proved that EC is an effective method for the removal of COD and FOG, rendering an effluent that meets the permissible discharge standards for the City of Cape Town. The novel Ecoflush™ also proved to be very efficient in the removal of FOG from PSW.

Having certain bacteria called phosphorus-accumulating organisms (PAOs) is important for getting rid of phosphorus (P) in wastewater from homes. This happens in a process called enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR), where PAOs are active in activated sludge. To design and make EBPR processes work better, we need to have an in-depth understanding of how PAOs work. The best way to learn about them is by studying them in a laboratory. This study undertook to culture these microorganisms in the laboratory. A University of Cape Town membrane bioreactor (UCTMBR) activated sludge (AS) system was used to grow the microorganisms and see how well it worked. This paper looked at what type of substrate PAOs like best, either acetate or propionate, and how providing them with more of their preferred substrate affects how they grow. During the process, it was observed that P was not released or taken up significantly when acetate was added to the influent. The levels were consistently low at around 5.74 ± 4.47 mgP/L infl (release) and 19.9 ± 7.17 mgP/L infl (uptake). The signs become much better when propionate was used instead of acetate. When the amount of propionate in the influent was increased from 50% to 76% (as a percentage of influent total chemical oxygen demand), the amount of P released went up to 155 ± 17.7 mgP/L infl, and the amount of P taken up went up to 213.7 ± 11.4 mgP/L infl. The proof given indicated that propionate is preferred by PAOs. This study found that when more propionate was added to the wastewater, the concentration of PAO biomass went up. This was shown by certain signs that PAOs display when they are present. Results presented in this journal article emanate from an MSc Thesis (Thela, 2022) published in open-source UCT.