Understanding the impact of stressors on the rating of perceived exertion (RPE) is relevant from a performance and exercise adherence/participation standpoint. Athletes and recreationally active individuals dehydrate during exercise. No attempt has been made to systematically determine the impact of exercise-induced dehydration (EID) on RPE. The present meta-analysis aimed to determine the effect of EID on RPE during endurance exercise and examine the moderating effect of potential confounders. Performed on raw RPE values using random-effects models weighted mean effect summaries and meta-regressions with robust standard errors, and with a practical meaningful effect set at 1 point difference between euhydration (EUH) and EID. Only controlled crossover studies measuring RPE with a Borg scale in healthy adults performing ≥30 min of continuous endurance exercise while dehydrating or drinking to maintain EUH were included. Sixteen studies were included, representing 147 individuals. Mean body mass loss with EUH was 0.5 ± 0.4%, compared to 2.3 ± 0.5% with EID (range 1.7–3.1%). Within an EID of 0.5–3% body mass, a maximum difference in RPE of 0.81 points (95% CI: 0.36–1.27) was observed between conditions. A meta-regression revealed that RPE increases by 0.21 points for each 1% increase in EID (95% CI: 0.12–0.31). Humidity, ambient temperature and aerobic capacity did not alter the relationship between EID and RPE. Therefore, the effect of EID on RPE is unlikely to be practically meaningful until a body mass loss of at least 3%.

Maximal oxygen consumption ($\dot{\mathrm{V}}$O_2max) is a major determinant of 5-km running time-trial (TT) performance. Glycerol-induced hyperhydration (GIH) could improve $\dot{\mathrm{V}}$O_2max in recreationally active persons through an optimal increase in plasma volume. Moreover, ingestion of a large bolus of cold fluid before exercise could decrease thermal stress during exercise, potentially contributing to improved performance. We determined the effect of GIH on 5-km running TT performance in 10 recreationally active individuals (age: 24 ± 4 years; $\dot{\mathrm{V}}$O_2max: 48 ± 3 mL/kg/min). Using a randomized and counterbalanced protocol, participants underwent two, 120-min hydration protocols where they ingested a 1) 30 mL/kg fat-free mass (FFM) of cold water (~4 °C) with an artificial sweetener + 1.4 g glycerol/kg FFM over the first 60 min (GIH) or 2) 7.5 mL/kg FFM of cold water with an artificial sweetener over the first 20 min (EUH). Following GIH and EUH, participants underwent a 5-km running TT at 30 °C and 50% relative humidity. After 120 min, GIH was associated with significantly greater fluid retention (846 ± 415 mL) and plasma volume changes (10.1 ± 8.4%) than EUH, but gastrointestinal (GI) temperature did not differ. During exercise, 5-km running TT performance (GIH: 22.95 ± 2.62; EUH: 22.52 ± 2.74 min), as well as heart rate, GI temperature and perceived exertion did not significantly differ between conditions. This study demonstrates that the additional body water and plasma volume gains provided by GIH do not improve 5-km running TT performance in the heat in recreationally active individuals.

Using a randomized crossover protocol, 10 young men completed four 180 min exposures (38 °C, 60% relative humidity), alternating between 30 min of walking and 30 min of sitting where fluid or ice slurry were served. Participants underwent four trials: (i) 5 mL·kg body mass⁻¹ of 20 °C water (CON); (ii) 5 mL·kg body mass⁻¹ of 20 °C water + fan at 4 m·s⁻¹ (FAN); (iii) fan + 3 mL·kg body mass⁻¹ of ice slurry + 2 mL·kg body mass⁻¹ of 4 °C water (FAN + ISCW); and (iv) FAN + ISCW + lower-leg immersion in 20 °C water (FAN + ISCW + LLI). Sweat and body mass losses were higher with FAN than CON, FAN + ISCW, and FAN + ISCW + LLI. Mean and peak changes in Δrectal temperature, heart rate, and perceived heat and thirst from baseline were not statistically and practically different between FAN and CON. FAN + ISCW + LLI decreased sweat loss compared with FAN + ISCW and mean and peak changes in Δrectal temperature, heart rate, and perceived thirst compared with CON. FAN + ISCW + LLI also attenuated the changes in Δrectal temperature (peak) and thirst (mean and peak) compared with FAN. In conclusion, FAN slightly exacerbates fluid loss but does not attenuate the changes in Δrectal temperature, heart rate, and perceived heat and thirst during intermittent physical activity in hot–humid conditions. However, coupling ISCW or ISCW + LLI with the use of a fan attenuates the increase in these outcomes compared with no intervention and to a greater extent for rectal temperature and thirst when fan is coupled with ISCW + LLI than when it is used in isolation.