Amanda Fencl

Dr. Amanda Fencl

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
4 October 2020 in WIREs Water
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
KMKatie Meehan
Katie Meehan
WJWendy Jepson
Wendy Jepson
Leila M. HarrisLeila M. Harris
Leila M. Harris
AWAmber Wutich
Amber Wutich
MBMelissa Beresford
Melissa Beresford
SYSera Young
Sera Young
Safe and secure water is a cornerstone of modern life in the global North. This article critically examines a set of prevalent myths about household water in high‐income countries, with a focus on Canada and the United States. Taking a relational approach, we argue that household water insecurity is a product of institutionalized structures and power, manifests unevenly through space and time, and is reproduced in places we tend to assume are the most water‐secure in the world. We first briefly introduce “modern water” and the modern infrastructural ideal, a highly influential set of ideas that have shaped household water provision and infrastructure development over the past two centuries. Against this backdrop, we consolidate evidence to disrupt a set of narratives about water in high‐income countries: the notion that water access is universal, clean, affordable, trustworthy, and uniformly or equitably governed. We identify five thematic areas of future research to delineate an agenda for advancing scholarship and action—including challenges of legal and regulatory regimes, the housing‐water nexus, water affordability, and water quality and contamination. Data gaps underpin the experiences of household water insecurity. Taken together, our review of water security for households in high‐income countries provides a conceptual map to direct critical research in this area for the coming years.This article is categorized under: Human Water > Human Water

18 March 2020 in Environmental Research Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RPRichard Pauloo
Richard Pauloo
Alvar Escriva-BouAlvar Escriva-Bou
Alvar Escriva-Bou
HDHelen Dahlke
Helen Dahlke
AFAmanda Fencl
Amanda Fencl
HGHervé Guillon
Hervé Guillon
GFG E Fogg
G E Fogg
Millions of Californians access drinking water via domestic wells, which are vulnerable to drought and unsustainable groundwater management. Groundwater overdraft and the possibility of longer drought duration under climate change threatens domestic well reliability, yet we lack tools to assess the impact of such events. Here, we leverage 943 469 well completion reports and 20 years of groundwater elevation data to develop a spatially-explicit domestic well failure model covering California’s Central Valley. Our model successfully reproduces the spatial distribution of observed domestic well failures during the severe 2012–2016 drought (n = 2027). Next, the impact of longer drought duration (5–8 years) on domestic well failure is evaluated, indicating that if the 2012–2016 drought would have continued into a 6 to 8 year long drought, a total of 4037–5460 to 6538–8056 wells would fail. The same drought duration scenarios with an intervening wet winter in 2017 lead to an average of 498 and 738 fewer well failures. Additionally, we map vulnerable wells at high failure risk and find that they align with clusters of predicted well failures. Lastly, we evaluate how the timing and implementation of different projected groundwater management regimes impact groundwater levels and thus domestic well failure. When historic overdraft persists until 2040, domestic well failures range from 5966 to 10 466 (depending on the historic period considered). When sustainability is achieved progressively between 2020 and 2040, well failures range from 3677 to 6943, and from 1516 to 2513 when groundwater is not allowed to decline after 2020.

1 January 2009 in Energy Policy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
WDWilliam Dougherty
William Dougherty
SKSivan Kartha
Sivan Kartha
CRChella Rajan
Chella Rajan
MLMichael Lazarus
Michael Lazarus
ABAlison Bailie
Alison Bailie
AFAmanda Fencl
Amanda Fencl

23 December 2016 in Climatic Change
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JEJulia A. Ekstrom
Julia A. Ekstrom
LBLouise Bedsworth
Louise Bedsworth
AFAmanda Fencl
Amanda Fencl
Understanding resource managers’ perceptions of climate change, analytic capacity, and current adaptation activities can provide insight into what can help support adaptation processes at the local level. In California, where a major drought currently demonstrates some of the hardships that could be regularly encountered under a changing climate, we present results from a survey of drinking water utilities about the perceived threat, analytic capacity, and adaptation actions related to maintaining water quality in the face of climate change. Among surveyed utilities (n = 259), awareness is high in regard to climate change occurring and its potential impacts on water quality globally, but perceived risk is lower with regard to climate impacts on local drinking water quality. Just over half of surveyed utilities report at least some adaptation activity to date. The top three variables that most strongly correlated with reported adaptation action were (1) perceived risk on global and local water quality, (2) surface water reliance, and (3) provision of other services beyond drinking water. Other tested variables significantly correlated with reported adaptation action were (4) degree of impact from the current drought and (5) communication with climate change experts. Findings highlight that smaller groundwater-reliant utilities may need the most assistance to initiate climate adaptation processes. Trusted information sources most frequently used across respondents were state government agencies, followed by colleagues in the same utilities. The finding that frequently used sources of information are similar across utilities presents a promising opportunity for training and disseminating climate information to assist those systems needing the most support.

1 December 2021 in Utilities Policy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
KDKristin B. Dobbin
Kristin B. Dobbin
AFAmanda Fencl
Amanda Fencl

30 August 2022 in Policy Studies Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EBEmily V. Bell
Emily V. Bell
AFAmanda Fencl
Amanda Fencl
MMMegan Mullin
Megan Mullin