Woojin Lee

Dr. Woojin Lee


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

1Year (2026-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CYClaire Yuan
Claire Yuan
ADAriana DeMers
Ariana DeMers
VSVictor M Silva-Ortiz
Victor M Silva-Ortiz
JHJamal Hasoon
Jamal Hasoon
WLWoojin Lee
Woojin Lee
Christopher Louis RobinsonChristopher Louis Robinson
Christopher Louis Robinson
Body Protective Compound-157 (BPC-157) is a synthetic pentadecapeptide derived from gastric proteins that has demonstrated notable reparative and anti-inflammatory properties across diverse preclinical models. Experimental evidence reveals that BPC-157 supports angiogenesis, collagen synthesis, fibroblast activity, and modulation of nitric oxide pathways, contributing to enhanced healing of muscle, tendon, ligament, bone, and gastrointestinal tissue. Studies also report reduced inflammatory cytokine activity, improved microvascular integrity, and beneficial effects on pain modulation through peripheral and dopaminergic mechanisms. Although animal data indicate favorable safety and pharmacokinetics, human research remains limited to small pilot studies investigating musculoskeletal pain, interstitial cystitis, and intravenous administration, all suggesting potential therapeutic value without reported major adverse effects. However, inconsistent preparation standards, limited clinical validation, and regulatory restrictions underscore the need for rigorous controlled trials. BPC-157 remains a promising candidate for regenerative medicine, yet comprehensive evaluation is required before clinical translation can be recommended.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
WLWoojin Lee
Woojin Lee
QRQing Zhao Ruan
Qing Zhao Ruan
JHJamal Hasoon
Jamal Hasoon
RKRonald J. Kulich
Ronald J. Kulich
TDTimothy R. Deer
Timothy R. Deer
Christopher Louis RobinsonChristopher Louis Robinson
Christopher Louis Robinson
As the population ages, the incidence and prevalence of musculoskeletal degeneration, such as osteoarthritis, increase. While the currently accepted treatment options provide symptomatic and functional improvement, they do not halt the progression of osteoarthritis. This results in the eventual need for surgery for many patients with advanced osteoarthritis. Due to the seemingly inevitable progression of OA, many clinicians and researchers have shifted their focus to regenerative therapies. Orthobiologics, a specific type of regenerative therapy designed to treat orthopedic conditions, has been gaining traction in recent years due to the utilization of autologous biological substances and synthetic peptides in healing musculoskeletal injuries and degenerative conditions. Orthobiologics can be distinguished into one of four classes: cell-based, biologic fluids-based, matrix-based, molecular-based, and based on their composition. In this review, key examples of each class, mechanism of action, and current clinical data for each agent are examined. Limitations of current orthobiologics involve a lack of standardization in the preparation and administration of each agent, as well as uniformity in assessment endpoints across different clinical studies. Lastly, we will discuss future directions of orthobiologics as a therapy for the treatment of osteoarthritis.

21 April 2026 in Preprints.org
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
WLWoojin Lee
Woojin Lee
QRQing Zhao Ruan
Qing Zhao Ruan
JHJamal Hasoon
Jamal Hasoon
RKRonald J. Kulich
Ronald J. Kulich
TDTimothy R. Deer
Timothy R. Deer
Christopher Louis RobinsonChristopher Louis Robinson
Christopher Louis Robinson
As the population ages, the incidence and prevalence of musculoskeletal degeneration, such as osteoarthritis increases. While the currently accepted treatment options provide symptomatic and functional improvement, they do not halt the progression of osteoarthritis. This results in eventual need for surgery for many patients with advanced osteoarthritis. Due to seemingly inevitable progression of OA, many clinicians and researchers have shifted their focus to regenerative therapies. Orthobiologics, a specific type of regenerative therapy designed to treat orthopedic conditions, have been gaining traction in recent years due to utilization of autologous biological substances and synthetic peptides in healing in musculoskeletal injuries and degenerative conditions. Orthobiologics can be distinguished into one of four classes: cell-based, biologic fluids-based, matrix-based and molecular-based, and based on its composition. In this review, key examples of each class, mechanism of action, and current clinical data for each agent are examined. Limitations of current orthobiologics involve lack of standardization in preparation and administration each agent as well as uniformity in assessment end points across different clinical studies. Lastly, we will discuss future directions of orthobiologics as a therapy for treatment in osteoarthritis.

29 July 2026 in Preprints.org
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
AJAnkur Jain
Ankur Jain
DGDavid M. Gallacher
David M. Gallacher
MIMohammed A. Issa
Mohammed A. Issa
TDTimothy R. Deer
Timothy R. Deer
RYRobert Jason Yong
Robert Jason Yong
Christopher Louis RobinsonChristopher Louis Robinson
Christopher Louis Robinson
Epitalon is a synthetic tetrapeptide derived from the amino acid composition of Epithalamin, a polypeptide extract derived from the bovine pineal gland. Current preclinical evidence suggests that Epitalon may activate telomerase by upregulating human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT). In aged primates, Epitalon has also been associated with restoring evening melatonin synthesis and circadian cortisol rhythms. It has also been shown to enhance endogenous antioxidant defenses, including the activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and glutathione peroxidase. These mechanisms may be relevant to the future of regenerative medicine, as dysregulation of these pathways has been independently implicated in common musculoskeletal conditions, including osteoarthritis, disc degeneration, osteoporosis, and impaired tissue repair. In female mice, although Epitalon did not affect mean lifespan, the maximum lifespan increased by 12.3%. Evidence suggests that it may preserve retinal integrity in hereditary retinitis pigmentosa without reported adverse effects.[1] No human randomized controlled trials, pharmacokinetic studies, or registered trials of Epitalon have been reported at the time of this publication. The related polypeptide preparation Epithalamin, however, does have limited human studies in elderly patients. Epithalamin treatment was associated with a reduced incidence of cardiovascular and musculoskeletal disease, as well as decreased mortality over 6-8 years of follow-up.[2] This review synthesizes the available evidence on Epitalon in the context of regenerative medicine.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AJAnkur Jain
Ankur Jain
DGDavid M. Gallacher
David M. Gallacher
MIMohammed A. Issa
Mohammed A. Issa
TDTimothy R. Deer
Timothy R. Deer
RYRobert Jason Yong
Robert Jason Yong
Christopher Louis RobinsonChristopher Louis Robinson
Christopher Louis Robinson
Epitalon (Ala-Glu-Asp-Gly) is a synthetic tetrapeptide developed from the amino-acid composition of epithalamin, a chemically distinct pineal-derived polypeptide preparation. This narrative review evaluates the mechanistic, preclinical, and human evidence for synthetic epitalon in the context of regenerative and longevity medicine, while considering epithalamin studies separately as historical context. PubMed and Google Scholar were searched through 22 September 2026, with primary experimental and clinical studies prioritized and evidence appraised by study design, model, sample size, intervention, outcomes, safety reporting, and independent replication. Epitalon has been reported to modulate telomere-maintenance pathways, circadian and neuroendocrine function, oxidative stress, and cellular aging markers. Preclinical studies suggest biological activity, but direct evidence in musculoskeletal disease models is lacking. Human evidence is limited to small physiological or biomarker studies and an older controlled study in retinitis pigmentosa; no adequately powered randomized trial has established therapeutic efficacy. Pharmacokinetic, dose-ranging, and long-term safety data remain inadequate, while oncologic, immunogenicity, product-quality, and regulatory uncertainties following a 2026 FDA advisory review remain unresolved. Epitalon is therefore biologically active but clinically unproven, and further standardized pharmacologic, safety, and disease-specific studies are needed before clinical translation.

9 September 2026 in Preprints.org
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
AJAnkur Jain
Ankur Jain
DGDavid M. Gallacher
David M. Gallacher
MIMohammed A. Issa
Mohammed A. Issa
TDTimothy R. Deer
Timothy R. Deer
RYRobert Jason Yong
Robert Jason Yong
Christopher Louis RobinsonChristopher Louis Robinson
Christopher Louis Robinson
Epitalon is a synthetic tetrapeptide (Ala-Glu-Asp-Gly) developed from the amino-acid composition of epithalamin, a pineal-derived polypeptide preparation. Although historically related, the two preparations are chemically distinct and their evidence should not be considered interchangeable. This narrative review examines the mechanistic, preclinical, and human evidence for epitalon, with epithalamin studies considered separately as historical context. The strongest mechanistic evidence for epitalon involves telomerase activation and telomere elongation in human cell lines. These findings were independently replicated in 2025, with telomere extension occurring through hTERT/telomerase upregulation in normal cells and alternative lengthening of telomeres in cancer cell lines.[1] Preclinical studies have also reported age-dependent neuroendocrine effects, antioxidant-associated activity, and tissue-protective effects. In female mice, epitalon did not increase mean lifespan but increased maximum lifespan by 12.3%.[2] Human epitalon evidence remains limited to small physiological or biomarker studies and an older report in retinitis pigmentosa; no adequately powered randomized trial has established therapeutic efficacy.[1,3,4] Historical epithalamin studies have reported neuroendocrine, antioxidant, cardiovascular, and longevity-associated outcomes, but these findings cannot be directly extrapolated to epitalon. Human pharmacokinetic, dose-ranging, and dedicated prospective safety studies remain unavailable, while telomere-maintenance effects raise theoretical but unresolved questions regarding long-term oncologic safety. FDA reviewed epitalon free base and acetate through the 2026 PCAC compounding process, which does not constitute therapeutic approval. [5] Overall, epitalon demonstrates biologically relevant activity but remains clinically unproven. Independent replication, pharmaceutical characterization, pharmacokinetic and safety studies, disease-specific preclinical models, and appropriately designed human trials are needed before its role in regenerative or longevity medicine can be established.