BACKGROUND: Meningioma en plaque (MEP) is a rare subtype of meningioma with a carpet-like growth pattern, often causing hyperostosis. Even rarer is the presentation of bilateral MEP posing diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Management of MEP usually entails early complete resection. Follow-up may be considered for asymptomatic and slow-growing tumors. OBSERVATIONS: The authors present the case of a 52-year-old patient with progressive optic neuropathy due to bilateral hyperostotic frontotemporal MEP. Long-standing intracranial hypertension caused by mass effect had led to formation of a suprachiasmatic cyst deflecting the optic chiasm. The authors aimed to lower the intracranial pressure indirectly by performing a targeted, right-sided craniectomy with tumor removal and mesh cranioplasty. Postoperatively, reconstitution of brain anatomy and stabilization of the optic neuropathy were observed. LESSONS: To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first case report addressing targeted decompression for severe, long-standing anatomical distortion due to bilateral hyperostotic MEP. Complete resection as recommended for MEPs would have been associated with a high risk of perioperative morbidity in this case. In case of neurological deterioration due to decompensated intracranial hypertension, indirect decompression can effectively address chronic distortion of anatomy. This case report highlights the need for individualized management strategies for extensive MEPs. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE25382
Background/Objectives: Selection of the optimal recipient artery in superficial temporal artery to middle cerebral artery (STA–MCA) extracranial–intracranial bypass surgery is essential to ensure adequate cerebral perfusion. Various pre- and intraoperative tools for target vessel selection have been proposed. Indocyanine green fluorescence video angiography (ICG-VA) enables real-time visualization of cerebral hemodynamics, facilitating recipient vessel selection and anastomotic evaluation. Here, we review the literature and present the use of qualitative ICG-VA to support intraoperative decision-making during double-barrel (DB) STA–MCA bypass surgery. Case description: We report the case of a 68-year-old patient with bilateral steno-occlusive cerebrovascular disease, who developed progressive hemodynamic compromise of the left hemisphere after prior right-sided STA-MCA bypass. Preoperative imaging demonstrated impaired perfusion and posterior-to-anterior leptomeningeal collateralization from the posterior cerebral artery. During the left-sided DB bypass surgery, intravenous ICG-VA was used to assess relative cortical perfusion. Two superficial M4 branches with the most pronounced perfusion delay were selected as recipients based on the ICG-VA and anatomical criteria. Postoperative angiography confirmed graft patency. At short-term follow-up, the patient remained neurologically stable, with complete regression of preoperative symptoms. Conclusions: This case illustrates the application of qualitative ICG-VA for perfusion-oriented recipient vessel selection in DB STA-MCA bypass for steno-occlusive disease. Real-time perfusion assessment may complement conventional anatomical criteria for recipient vessel selection in flow-augmentation procedures. Further studies incorporating quantitative hemodynamic analysis are warranted.
Background: Mixed-reality head-mounted display (MR-HMD) visualization and 3D-printed models may improve three-dimensional visualization in neurosurgical planning. Detailed, reproducible descriptions of the workflows, technical requirements, and practical limitations of these techniques in aneurysm clip ligation planning remain limited. Methods: Between February 2020 and June 2021, patient-specific MR-HMD visualizations and 3D-printed models were generated for 29 patients undergoing elective surgical clip ligation of intracranial aneurysms. CT and 3D rotational angiography were fused to create patient-specific holograms for MR-HMD visualization and 3D-printed models. All cases underwent standardized modality-specific processing. Preparation and manufacturing times as well as recorded workflow-related usability observations, technical advantages, and limitations were assessed. Results: The mean total preparation time (mean ± standard deviation, SD) was 40.6 ± 10.3 min for MR-HMD visualization and 108.8 ± 17.8 min for 3D-printed models, excluding printing, washing, and curing time. The average printing time for 3D-printed models was 894.9 ± 41.6 min. MR-HMD setup in the operating room averaged 7.0 ± 2.8 min. Identified limitations included manual hologram registration and repositioning after table or patient position changes, as well as the inability to track instruments or interact with the hologram. Conclusions: Both modalities could be integrated into a standardized patient-specific workflow and serve complementary functions. MR-HMD visualization supported flexible short-term visualization, whereas 3D-printed models provided a physical model for clip planning and patient education at the cost of longer preparation and production. These findings support a combined workflow in which modality selection is guided by clinical tasks and time constraints.