ASCO Guidelines provide recommendations with comprehensive review and analyses of the relevant literature for each recommendation, following the guideline development process as outlined in the ASCO Guidelines Methodology Manual . ASCO Guidelines follow the ASCO Conflict of Interest Policy for Clinical Practice Guidelines . Clinical Practice Guidelines and other guidance (“Guidance”) provided by ASCO is not a comprehensive or definitive guide to treatment options. It is intended for voluntary use by clinicians and should be used in conjunction with independent professional judgment. Guidance may not be applicable to all patients, interventions, diseases or stages of diseases. Guidance is based on review and analysis of relevant literature and is not intended as a statement of the standard of care. ASCO does not endorse third-party drugs, devices, services, or therapies and assumes no responsibility for any harm arising from or related to the use of this information. See complete disclaimer in Appendix 1 and 2 (online only) for more . PURPOSE: To provide evidence-based recommendations to practicing physicians and others on the management of pleural mesothelioma (PM). METHODS: ASCO convened an Expert Panel of medical oncology, thoracic surgery, radiation oncology, pathology, cancer genetics, and advocacy experts to conduct an updated literature search, which included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and prospective and retrospective comparative observational studies published from 2016 through 2024. Outcomes of interest included survival, disease-free or recurrence-free survival, and quality of life. Expert Panel members used available evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations. RESULTS: The literature search identified 110 additional relevant studies to inform the evidence base for this guideline. RECOMMENDATIONS: Evidence-based recommendations were developed for surgical cytoreduction, immunotherapy, chemotherapy, pathology, and germline testing in patients with PM. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/thoracic-cancer-guidelines .

Telomere biology disorders (TBDs) present heterogeneously, ranging from infantile bone marrow failure associated with very short telomeres to adult-onset interstitial lung disease (ILD) with normal telomere length. Yield of genetic testing and phenotypic spectra for TBDs caused by the expanding list of telomere genes in adults remain understudied. Thus, we screened adults aged ≥18 years with a personal and/or family history clustering hematologic disorders and/or ILD enrolled on The University of Chicago Inherited Hematologic Disorders Registry for causative variants in 13 TBD genes. Sixteen (10%) of 153 probands carried causative variants distributed among TERT (n = 6), TERC (n = 4), PARN (n = 5), or RTEL1 (n = 1), of which 19% were copy number variants. The highest yield (9 of 22 [41%]) was in families with mixed hematologic and ILD presentations, suggesting that ILD in hematology populations and hematologic abnormalities in ILD populations warrant TBD genetic testing. Four (3%) of 117 familial hematologic disorder families without ILD carried TBD variants, making TBD second to only DDX41 in frequency for genetic diagnoses in this population. Phenotypes of 17 carriers with heterozygous PARN variants included 4 (24%) with hematologic abnormalities, 67% with lymphocyte telomere lengths measured by flow cytometry and fluorescence in situ hybridization at or above the 10th percentile, and a high penetrance for ILD. Alternative etiologies for cytopenias and/or ILD such as autoimmune features were noted in multiple TBD families, emphasizing the need to maintain clinical suspicion for a TBD despite the presence of alternative explanations.

To avoid acquired variants found in the blood, cultured skin fibroblasts are a recommended DNA source for germline genetic testing in patients with hematologic disorders, but data are lacking regarding practicality and limitations. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 350 subjects with hematologic disorders who underwent skin fibroblast culture for germline genetic testing. We analyzed next‐generation sequencing data from the targeted capture of 144 inherited cancer and bonemarrow failure genes to identify variants at heterozygous and subclonal variant allele frequencies. Sixteen (5%) biopsies failed to culture. Culture failure was more likely in samples with delays in culture initiation (OR = 4.3; p < 0.01) or a pathogenic variant in a telomere gene (OR = 42.6; p < 0.01). Median culture time was 28 days (IQR 22−29 days). Culture time was longer for subjects with prior allogeneic stem cell transplantation (+10.7%; p = 0.02) and shorter in subjects with a heterozygous pathogenic variant (−11.9%; p < 0.01), larger biopsy size (−10.6%; p < 0.01), or lymphoid malignancy (−8.4%; p < 0.01). Subclonal variants were identified in 10 (4%) and confirmed in five (56%) of eight with alternate samples available. Subclonal and discordant variants illustrate that germline testing from cultured skin fibroblasts requires phenotypic correlation and, in rare cases, follow‐up studies for optimal interpretation.

Telomere biology disorders (TBDs) are genetic diseases caused by defective telomere maintenance. TBD patients often develop bone marrow failure and have an increased risk of myeloid neoplasms. To better understand the factors underlying hematopoietic outcomes in TBD, we comprehensively evaluated acquired genetic alterations in hematopoietic cells from 166 pediatric and adult TBD patients. Of these patients, 47.6% (28.8% of children, 56.1% of adults) had clonal hematopoiesis. Recurrent somatic alterations involved telomere maintenance genes (7.6%), spliceosome genes (10.4%, mainly U2AF1 p.S34), and chromosomal alterations (20.2%), including 1q gain (5.9%). Somatic variants affecting the DNA damage response (DDR) were identified in 21.5% of patients, including 20 presumed loss-of-function variants in ataxia-telangiectasia mutated ( ATM ). Using multimodal approaches, including single-cell sequencing, assays of ATM activation, telomere dysfunction-induced foci analysis, and cell-growth assays, we demonstrate telomere dysfunction–induced activation of the ATM-dependent DDR pathway with increased senescence and apoptosis in TBD patient cells. Pharmacologic ATM inhibition, modeling the effects of somatic ATM variants, selectively improved TBD cell fitness by allowing cells to bypass DDR-mediated senescence without detectably inducing chromosomal instability. Our results indicate that ATM-dependent DDR induced by telomere dysfunction is a key contributor to TBD pathogenesis and suggest dampening hyperactive ATM-dependent DDR as a potential therapeutic intervention.

Women who inherit a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation have an increased risk of breast cancer. Preliminary evidence suggests they may also have defects in bone marrow function. To test this hypothesis, we conducted a multicenter, retrospective, matched cohort study, comparing women with localized breast cancer requiring cytotoxic chemotherapy who carried an inherited BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation to similar wild‐type patients treated between 1995 and 2017 and matched based on age, race, site, and chemotherapy regimen. The proportion who developed specific hematologic toxicities, timing of these toxicities, and patterns of blood count fluctuations over time were compared among BRCA1 carriers vs matched wild‐type patients and among BRCA2 carriers vs matched wild‐type patients. 88 BRCA1 carriers and 75 BRCA2 carriers were matched to 226 and 242 wild‐type patients, respectively. The proportions and timing of experiencing any grade or grade 3/4 cytopenias during chemotherapy were not significantly different for BRCA1 carriers or BRCA2 carriers vs matched wild‐type patients. Proportions requiring treatment modifications and time to first modification were also similar. Patterns of blood count fluctuations over time in mutation carriers mirrored those in wild‐type patients overall and by the most common regimens. Women with an inherited mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2 experience similar frequency, severity, and timing of hematologic toxicities during curative intent breast cancer chemotherapy as matched wild‐type patients. Our findings suggest that BRCA1 or BRCA2 haploinsufficiency is sufficient for adequate bone marrow reserve in the face of short‐term repetitive hematopoietic stressors.