Since the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic started in late 2019, the search for protective vaccines and for drug treatments has become mandatory to fight the global health emergency. Travel restrictions, social distancing, and face masks are suitable counter measures, but may not bring the pandemic under control because people will inadvertently or at a certain degree of restriction severity or duration become incompliant with the regulations. Even if vaccines are approved, the need for antiviral agents against SARS-CoV-2 will persist. However, unequivocal evidence for efficacy against SARS-CoV-2 has not been demonstrated for any of the repurposed antiviral drugs so far. Amantadine was approved as an antiviral drug against influenza A, and antiviral activity against SARS-CoV-2 has been reasoned by analogy but without data. We tested the efficacy of amantadine in vitro in Vero E6 cells infected with SARS-CoV-2. Indeed, amantadine inhibited SARS-CoV-2 replication in two separate experiments with IC₅₀ concentrations between 83 and 119 µM. Although these IC₅₀ concentrations are above therapeutic amantadine levels after systemic administration, topical administration by inhalation or intranasal instillation may result in sufficient amantadine concentration in the airway epithelium without high systemic exposure. However, further studies in other models are needed to prove this hypothesis.

Botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT/A) is intramuscularly injected for the treatment of, e.g., spasticity, cervical dystonia or facial lines. Several BoNT/A products with or without complexing proteins, with non-interchangeable dose units and various duration of effect claims, are approved but hard to compare. The goal of this study was to compare the complexing protein-free approved BoNT/A products IncobotulinumtoxinA (INCO), DaxibotulinumtoxinA (DAXI) and RelabotulinumtoxinA (RELA) in vitro and in vivo. BoNT/A protein content per 100 U was lowest in INCO and highest in DAXI (INCO 0.44, RELA 0.46, DAXI 0.58 ng/100 U). Relative bioactivity of INCO, DAXI and RELA was comparable (116, 104 and 117 U/100 labeled units). INCO and DAXI caused a maximum mouse digit abduction score (DAS) 2–3 days after IM injection of 20 or 40 U/kg. The DAS after 20 U/kg INCO was higher and showed a 10 days longer paralysis than DAXI at equivalent dosing. The in vivo spread of DAXI in the mouse gastrocnemius muscle was indistinguishable from that after INCO, and the spread of RELA ex vivo in porcine muscle was larger than INCO but equal to 0.9% NaCl. These results show the differences between 150 kDa botulinum type A toxin products beyond the published claims.