Spandidos Publications is a scientific publisher with a long-standing international reputation for excellent standards and high quality science publications
Gastrointestinal motility may be impaired after intestinal surgery. Epidural morphine is effective in controlling postoperative pain, but can further reduce gastrointestinal motility. Here, we aimed to investigate the effects of epidural dexmedetomidine on gastrointestinal motility in patients undergoing colonic resection. Seventy-four patients undergoing colonic resection were enrolled in this clinical trial and allocated randomly to treatment with dexmedetomidine (D group) or morphine (M group). The D group received a loading dose epidural administration of 3 ml dexmedetomidine (0.5 μg kg -1 ) and then a continuous epidural administration of 80 μg dexmedetomidine in 150 ml levobupivacaine (0.125%) at 3 ml h -1 for two days. The M group received a loading dose epidural administration of 3 ml morphine (0.03 mg kg -1 ) and then a continuous epidural administration of 4.5 mg morphine in 150 ml levobupivacaine at 3 ml h -1 for two days. Verbal rating score (VRS), postoperative analgesic requirements, side effects related to analgesia, the time to postoperative first flatus (FFL) and first feces (FFE) were recorded. VRS and postoperative analgesic requirements were not significantly different between treatment groups. In contrast, the time to FFL and time to FFE were significant longer in M group in comparison to D group (P < 0.05). Moreover, patients in M group had a significantly higher incidence of nausea, vomiting, and pruritus (P < 0.05). No patients showed neurologic deficits in either group. In comparison to morphine, epidural dexmedetomidine is safe and beneficial for the recovery of gastrointestinal motility after colonic resection when used as an adjunct with levobupivacaine for postoperative pain control. Trial Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR-TRC-14004644
The inhibition of mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs), including c-Jun NH2-terminal protein kinase (JNK), p38 MAPK (p38) and extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2), have an important effect on lung ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) during lung transplantation (LT). However, the way in which combined MAPK inhibition exerts optimal protective effects on lung IRI remains to be elucidated. Therefore, the present study evaluated the therapeutic efficacy of the inhibition of MAPKs in rat pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells (PMVECs) in an IRI model of LT. The rat PMVECs were transfected with small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) against JNK, p38 or ERK1/2. Cotransfection was performed with siRNAs against JNK and p38 in the J+p group, JNK and ERK1/2 in the J+E group, p38 and ERK1/2 in the p+E group, or all three in the J+p+E group. Non-targeting (NT) siRNA was used as a control. The PMVECs were then treated to induce IRI, and the levels of inflammation, apoptosis and oxidative stress were detected. Differences between compared groups were determined using Tukey's honest significant difference test. In all groups, silencing of the MAPKs was shown to attenuate inflammation, apoptosis and oxidative stress to differing extents, compared with the NT group. The J+p and J+p+E groups showed lower levels of interleukin (IL)-1, IL-6 and malondialdehyde, a lower percentage of early-apoptotic cells, and higher superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity, compared with the other groups. No significant differences were observed in the inflammatory response, SOD activity or early apoptosis between the J+p and J+p+E groups. These findings suggested that the dual inhibition of JNK and p38 led to maximal amelioration of lung IRI in the PMVECs of the IRI model of LT, which occurred through anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidative and anti-apoptotic mechanisms.