Chiara Arienti

Dr. Chiara Arienti

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
11 January 2016 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Michele ZanoniMichele Zanoni
Michele Zanoni
Filippo PiccininiFilippo Piccinini
Filippo Piccinini
CAChiara Arienti
Chiara Arienti
AZAlice Zamagni
Alice Zamagni
Spartaco SantiSpartaco Santi
Spartaco Santi
ATAnna Tesei
Anna Tesei
The potential of a spheroid tumor model composed of cells in different proliferative and metabolic states for the development of new anticancer strategies has been amply demonstrated. However, there is little or no information in the literature on the problems of reproducibility of data originating from experiments using 3D models. Our analyses, carried out using a novel open source software capable of performing an automatic image analysis of 3D tumor colonies, showed that a number of morphology parameters affect the response of large spheroids to treatment. In particular, we found that both spheroid volume and shape may be a source of variability. We also compared some commercially available viability assays specifically designed for 3D models. In conclusion, our data indicate the need for a pre-selection of tumor spheroids of homogeneous volume and shape to reduce data variability to a minimum before use in a cytotoxicity test. In addition, we identified and validated a cytotoxicity test capable of providing meaningful data on the damage induced in large tumor spheroids of up to diameter in 650 μm by different kinds of treatments.

20 July 2017 in Biological Procedures Online
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Filippo PiccininiFilippo Piccinini
Filippo Piccinini
ATAnna Tesei
Anna Tesei
CAChiara Arienti
Chiara Arienti
ABAlessandro Bevilacqua
Alessandro Bevilacqua
Whatever the target of an experiment in cell biology, cell counting and viability assessment are always computed. The Trypan Blue (TB) assay was proposed about a century ago and is still the most widely used method to perform cell viability analysis. Furthermore, the combined use of TB with a haemocytometer is also considered the standard approach to estimate cell population density. There are numerous research articles reporting the use of TB assays to compute cell number and viability of 2D and 3D cultures. However, the literature still lacks studies regarding the reliability of the TB assay in terms of assessment of its repeatability and reproducibility. We compared the TB assay's measurements obtained by two biologists who analysed 105 different samples in double-blind for a total of 210 counts performed. We measured: (a) the repeatability of the count performed by the same operator; (b) the reproducibility of counts performed by the two operators. There were no significant differences in the results obtained with 2D and 3D cell cultures: we estimated an approximate variability of 5% when the TB assay was used to assess the viability of the culture, and a variability of around 20% when it was used to determine the cell population density. The main aim of this study was to make researchers aware of potential measurement errors when TB is used with a haemocytometer for counting and viability measurements in 2D and 3D cultures. We believe that these results can help researchers to determine whether the expected reliability of the TB assay is compliant with their applications.

1 February 2015 in Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Filippo PiccininiFilippo Piccinini
Filippo Piccinini
ATAnna Tesei
Anna Tesei
CAChiara Arienti
Chiara Arienti
ABAlessandro Bevilacqua
Alessandro Bevilacqua

1 March 2022 in Frontiers in Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Michele ZanoniMichele Zanoni
Michele Zanoni
SBSara Bravaccini
Sara Bravaccini
FFFrancesco Fabbri
Francesco Fabbri
CAChiara Arienti
Chiara Arienti
Aldehyde dehydrogenases (ALDHs) are a family of detoxifying enzymes often upregulated in cancer cells and associated with therapeutic resistance. In humans, the ALDH family comprises 19 isoenzymes active in the majority of mammalian tissues. Each ALDH isoform has a specific differential expression pattern and most of them have individual functional roles in cancer. ALDHs are overexpressed in subpopulations of cancer cells with stem-like features, where they are involved in several processes including cellular proliferation, differentiation, detoxification and survival, participating in lipids and amino acid metabolism and retinoic acid synthesis. In particular, ALDH enzymes protect cancer cells by metabolizing toxic aldehydes in less reactive and more soluble carboxylic acids. High metabolic activity as well as conventional anticancer therapies contribute to aldehyde accumulation, leading to DNA double strand breaks (DSB) through the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and lipid peroxidation. ALDH overexpression is crucial not only for the survival of cancer stem cells but can also affect immune cells of the tumour microenvironment (TME). The reduction of ROS amount and the increase in retinoic acid signaling impairs immunogenic cell death (ICD) inducing the activation and stability of immunosuppressive regulatory T cells (Tregs). Dissecting the role of ALDH specific isoforms in the TME can open new scenarios in the cancer treatment. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge about the role of ALDH isoforms in solid tumors, in particular in association with therapy-resistance.

13 March 2009 in Journal of Cellular Physiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Paola UliviPaola Ulivi
Paola Ulivi
CAChiara Arienti
Chiara Arienti
DADino Amadori
Dino Amadori
FFFrancesco Fabbri
Francesco Fabbri
SCSilvia Carloni
Silvia Carloni
WZWainer Zoli
Wainer Zoli

24 January 2022 in Cell Death & Disease
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Michele ZanoniMichele Zanoni
Michele Zanoni
ASAlba Clara Sarti
Alba Clara Sarti
AZAlice Zamagni
Alice Zamagni
MCMichela Cortesi
Michela Cortesi
SPSara Pignatta
Sara Pignatta
Francesco Di VirgilioFrancesco Di Virgilio
Francesco Di Virgilio
Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most lethal brain tumor in adults. Radiation, together with temozolomide is the standard treatment, but nevertheless, relapse occurs in nearly all cases. Understanding the mechanisms underlying radiation resistance may help to find more effective therapies. After radiation treatment, ATP is released into the tumor microenvironment where it binds and activates purinergic P2 receptors, mainly of the P2X7 subtype. Two main P2X7 splice variants, P2X7A and P2X7B, are expressed in most cell types, where they associate with distinct biochemical and functional responses. GBM cells widely differ for the level of P2X7 isoform expression and accordingly for sensitivity to stimulation with extracellular ATP (eATP). Irradiation causes a dramatic shift in P2X7 isoform expression, with the P2X7A isoform being down- and the P2X7B isoform up-modulated, as well as extensive cell death and overexpression of stemness and senescence markers. Treatment with P2X7 blockers during the post-irradiation recovery potentiated irradiation-dependent cytotoxicity, suggesting that P2X7B activation by eATP generated a trophic/growth-promoting stimulus. Altogether, these data show that P2X7A and B receptor isoform levels are inversely modulated during the post-irradiation recovery phase in GBM cells.