Dennis Willsch

Dr. Dennis Willsch

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 2020 in Computer Physics Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DWDennis Willsch
Dennis Willsch
MWM. Willsch
M. Willsch
HRHans De Raedt
Hans De Raedt
KMK. Michielsen
K. Michielsen

1 April 2019 in Computer Physics Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
HRHans De Raedt
Hans De Raedt
FJFengping Jin
Fengping Jin
DWDennis Willsch
Dennis Willsch
MWMadita Willsch
Madita Willsch
NYNaoki Yoshioka
Naoki Yoshioka
KMKristel Michielsen
Kristel Michielsen

1 April 2022 in Quantum Information Processing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DWDennis Willsch
Dennis Willsch
MWMadita Willsch
Madita Willsch
CCCarlos D. Gonzalez Calaza
Carlos D. Gonzalez Calaza
FJFengping Jin
Fengping Jin
HRHans De Raedt
Hans De Raedt
KMKristel Michielsen
Kristel Michielsen
We benchmark the quantum processing units of the largest quantum annealers to date, the $$5000+$$ 5000 + qubit quantum annealer Advantage and its 2000+ qubit predecessor D-Wave 2000Q, using tail assignment and exact cover problems from aircraft scheduling scenarios. The benchmark set contains small, intermediate, and large problems with both sparsely connected and almost fully connected instances. We find that Advantage outperforms D-Wave 2000Q for almost all problems, with a notable increase in success rate and problem size. In particular, Advantage is also able to solve the largest problems with 120 logical qubits that D-Wave 2000Q cannot solve anymore. Furthermore, problems that can still be solved by D-Wave 2000Q are solved faster by Advantage. We find, however, that D-Wave 2000Q can achieve better success rates for sparsely connected problems that do not require the many new couplers present on Advantage, so improving the connectivity of a quantum annealer does not per se improve its performance.

14 February 2024 in Nature Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DWDennis Willsch
Dennis Willsch
DRDennis Rieger
Dennis Rieger
PWPatrick Winkel
Patrick Winkel
MWMadita Willsch
Madita Willsch
CDChristian Dickel
Christian Dickel
IPIoan M. Pop
Ioan M. Pop
Approaches to developing large-scale superconducting quantum processors must cope with the numerous microscopic degrees of freedom that are ubiquitous in solid-state devices. State-of-the-art superconducting qubits employ aluminium oxide (AlOx) tunnel Josephson junctions as the sources of nonlinearity necessary to perform quantum operations. Analyses of these junctions typically assume an idealized, purely sinusoidal current–phase relation. However, this relation is expected to hold only in the limit of vanishingly low-transparency channels in the AlOx barrier. Here we show that the standard current–phase relation fails to accurately describe the energy spectra of transmon artificial atoms across various samples and laboratories. Instead, a mesoscopic model of tunnelling through an inhomogeneous AlOx barrier predicts percent-level contributions from higher Josephson harmonics. By including these in the transmon Hamiltonian, we obtain orders of magnitude better agreement between the computed and measured energy spectra. The presence and impact of Josephson harmonics has important implications for developing AlOx-based quantum technologies including quantum computers and parametric amplifiers. As an example, we show that engineered Josephson harmonics can reduce the charge dispersion and associated errors in transmon qubits by an order of magnitude while preserving their anharmonicity.

1 November 2017 in Computer Physics Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
KMKristel Michielsen
Kristel Michielsen
MNMadita Nocon
Madita Nocon
DWDennis Willsch
Dennis Willsch
FJFengping Jin
Fengping Jin
TLThomas Lippert
Thomas Lippert
HRHans De Raedt
Hans De Raedt
With the advent of public access to small gate-based quantum processors, it becomes necessary to develop a benchmarking methodology such that independent researchers can validate the operation of these processors. We explore the usefulness of a number of simple quantum circuits as benchmarks for gate-based quantum computing devices and show that circuits performing identity operations are very simple, scalable and sensitive to gate errors and are therefore very well suited for this task. We illustrate the procedure by presenting benchmark results for the IBM Quantum Experience, a cloud-based platform for gate-based quantum computing.Comment: Accepted for publication in Computer Physics Communication

1 April 2024 in Quantum Science and Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JMJhon Montanez
Jhon Montanez
DWDennis Willsch
Dennis Willsch
AMAlberto Maldonado-Romo
Alberto Maldonado-Romo
KMKristel Michielsen
Kristel Michielsen
Solving combinatorial optimization problems of the kind that can be codified by quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) is a promising application of quantum computation. Some problems of this class suitable for practical applications such as the traveling salesman problem (TSP), the bin packing problem (BPP), or the knapsack problem (KP) have inequality constraints that require a particular cost function encoding. The common approach is the use of slack variables to represent the inequality constraints in the cost function. However, the use of slack variables considerably increases the number of qubits and operations required to solve these problems using quantum devices. In this work, we present an alternative method that does not require extra slack variables and consists of using an unbalanced penalization function to represent the inequality constraints in the QUBO. This function is characterized by larger penalization when the inequality constraint is not achieved than when it is. We evaluate our approach on the TSP, BPP, and KP, successfully encoding the optimal solution of the original optimization problem near the ground state cost Hamiltonian. Additionally, we employ D-Wave Advantage and D-Wave hybrid solvers to solve the BPP, surpassing the performance of the slack variables approach by achieving solutions for up to 29 items, whereas the slack variables approach only handles up to 11 items. This new approach can be used to solve combinatorial problems with inequality constraints with a reduced number of resources compared to the slack variables approach using quantum annealing or variational quantum algorithms.