Mario Lino Barata Raposo

Prof. Dr. Mario Lino Barata Raposo

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
20 July 2007 in Total Quality Management & Business Excellence
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Helena AlvesHelena Alves
Helena Alves
MRMario Lino Barata Raposo
Mario Lino Barata Raposo
To try and understand the factors which influence student satisfaction in higher education, as well as consequences of it, this study tests an explanatory model of student satisfaction in higher education. The model was tested through the utilization of structural equations and showed that the variable which has the most influence in student satisfaction in higher education is the variable – image followed by value and afterwards quality perceived. The conclusions of this study also mention the existence of a negative influence from the variable – expectations. It was also noticeable that the main consequence of satisfaction was student loyalty caused by word of mouth from student to student.

11 November 2016 in Psychology & Marketing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Helena AlvesHelena Alves
Helena Alves
CFCristina I Fernandes
Cristina I Fernandes
MRMario Lino Barata Raposo
Mario Lino Barata Raposo

8 March 2011 in Management Decision
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
EMEmerson Wagner Mainardes
Emerson Wagner Mainardes
Helena AlvesHelena Alves
Helena Alves
MRMario Lino Barata Raposo
Mario Lino Barata Raposo
Purpose – The objective of this paper is to collate and debate the main issues driving the stakeholder theory academic debate. Design/methodology/approach – First, a discussion of the stakeholder concept is set out before moving on to the history and nature of stakeholder theory. The work proceeds with an attempt to bring together systematically the points of divergence among researchers interested in stakeholder theory, and, finally, there is a brief discussion of these theoretical loopholes in conjunction with a proposed research agenda for the field. Findings – Based on the unification of the theoretically problematic issues, research agenda are put forward with the objective of clarifying doubts and resolving the controversies ongoing among academics. As regards the formulation of stakeholder theory, one question requiring resolution is that of the stakeholder concept itself. Additionally, further research should focus on the boundaries as to what constitutes a stakeholder group as well as defining the criteria for attributing individual membership of one or another group. In practical theoretical application, it is correspondingly necessary to target research on aspects such as conflicts of interest between stakeholders and management difficulties in coping with multiple objectives. Finally, there is a need for research that systematizes the knowledge produced with the objective of attaining the theoretical convergence necessary for the development of stakeholder theory. Originality/value – The main contribution of this paper derives from the systematization of the various shortcomings that need overcoming within the framework of stakeholder theory and the identification of research agendas.

8 May 2009 in Marketing Intelligence & Planning
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Arminda  PaçoArminda Paço
Arminda Paço
MRMario Lino Barata Raposo
Mario Lino Barata Raposo
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to identify distinct market segments based on several environmental variables. Given the complexity and the range of variables that may determine the characterisation of these groups, as was made evident in the literature review, it was decided to focus this research mainly on analysing the environmental and demographic criteria.Design/methodology/approach: The data were collected through a survey of Portuguese consumers, aged over 18. The model of data collection was a survey conducted by self‐administered questionnaire. A total of 887 were considered valid (the final sample). The questionnaire is composed of two sections. In the first part, data are collected about the demographic characteristics of respondents. The second part examines the environmental dimension (concern, affect, knowledge, environmentally friendly behaviours, information search, activism, green products buying behaviour, sensitivity to price, waste separation/recycling, perceived efficiency, scepticism, etc.). After collection, the data were statistically analysed and interpreted using the statistical software Statistical Package for Social Sciences 15.0. The data obtained were submitted to a multivariate statistical analysis, which included the following sequence of statistical treatment: factor analysis, cluster analysis and discriminant analysis. After this, a characterisation was made of the segments found.Findings: The results of this study show that there are consumers who buy green products and that certain environmental and demographic variables are significant for differentiating between the “greener” segment and the other segments. Yet, generally speaking, one is left with the impression that the Portuguese, despite their support for policies designed to improve the environment, do not translate their concerns into actions: they rarely join environmentalist associations and they do not take part in policy making. Their participation is often based on protecting the environment by saving electricity and water, which shows that these concerns may be more closely related with economic factors than with an environmental consciousness. It can be concluded that Portuguese consumers understand the challenges currently placed before the environment, and that they are aware of the existence of environmental problems, even though their concerns are not always translated into environmentally friendly behaviour. It was also noted that there are consumers who are prepared to base their buying decisions on purchasing products that do not harm the environment. In fact, it was seen that there is a segment of “greener” consumers in the sample that differs significantly in some aspects from the other market segments.Originality/value: The importance of market segmentation is highlighted, together with a presentation of the most relevant criteria for differentiating individuals in terms of their environmental behaviour. The results of this study show that there are consumers who buy green products and that certain environmental and demographic variables are significant for differentiating between the “greener” segment and the other segments.

1 May 2016 in Journal of Business Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Helena AlvesHelena Alves
Helena Alves
CFCristina I Fernandes
Cristina I Fernandes
MRMario Lino Barata Raposo
Mario Lino Barata Raposo

3 August 2012 in Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JFJoão J. Ferreira
João J. Ferreira
MRMario Lino Barata Raposo
Mario Lino Barata Raposo
Ricardo RodriguesRicardo Rodrigues
Ricardo Rodrigues
ADAnabela Dinis
Anabela Dinis
Arminda  PaçoArminda Paço
Arminda Paço
Purpose – The field of entrepreneurship is dotted across different paradigms. Measuring entrepreneurial intention automatically needs to incorporate insights from the psychological approach and behavioural approach. The purpose of this study was to develop and test a comprehensive structural equation model which combines both psychological and behavioural perspectives aiming to identify what variables have influence on entrepreneurial intention of secondary students. Design/methodology/approach – This research was developed involving a sample of secondary students. The method of data collection was a survey by self-administered questionnaire, to two secondary student classes, with several groups of questions related to demographic characteristics, behavioural and psychological constructs and entrepreneurial intention. Data was analysed using structural equation modelling (SEM). Findings – The results show that need for achievement, self-confidence, and personal attitude positively affect entrepreneurial intention. Furthermore, subjective norms and personal attitude affect perceived behavioural control. These findings could have a significant impact on knowledge of the contributions of behavioural and psychological theories to the entrepreneurial intention. Research limitations/implications – Understanding of the ways in which several psychological and behavioural characteristics influence the entrepreneurial intention could help to advance our knowledge of the entrepreneurial process. Educational systems need to be oriented to emphasize and value entrepreneurship in order to promote an enterprise culture. Methods to teach entrepreneurship should also be explored further. Originality/value – This is one of the first studies to provide evidences of the entrepreneurial intention explained by several constructs related to psychological and behavioural characteristics in a 14-15-year-old student population. Additionally, most studies of the entrepreneurial intention associated to these approaches have been mostly conceptual, and the few empirical studies have not used structural equation modelling. The use of these statistical tests helps to overcome the limitations evident in conceptual studies and provide evidence of the relationships between behavioural and psychological traits simultaneously.