Understanding how ecological dominance aligns with culturally and economically valued plant use is critical for participatory forest management. This study integrated vegetation structure and ethnobotanical valuation to assess angiosperm importance across three forest strata (Mixed Deciduous Forest (MDF), Dry Dipterocarp Forest site 1 (DDF1), and Dry Dipterocarp Forest site 2 (DDF2)) within the Ngao Model Forest, Northern Thailand. Fifteen 10 × 10 m vegetation plots (five per forest stratum) were surveyed to calculate the Importance Value Index (IVI), and 198 semi-structured interviews were conducted to derive the Use Value Index (UVI) and a standardized Socio-Economic Value Index (SEVI). A total of 112 angiosperm species were recorded across forest types, with strong structural dominance by dipterocarps in DDF sites and greater compositional heterogeneity in MDF. Spearman rank correlation analysis supported the working hypothesis that ecological dominance is only weakly associated with cultural and socio-economic importance. IVI showed weak but significant positive correlations with UVI (ρ = 0.288, p < 0.05) and SEVI (ρ = 0.300, p < 0.05), indicating partial but limited alignment between structural abundance and livelihood value. Several species with moderate or low IVI exhibited disproportionately high UVI and SEVI scores, reflecting their importance in food, medicinal, and commercial use categories. Conversely, certain canopy dominants showed limited ethnobotanical significance. These findings demonstrate that ecological abundance alone is an insufficient proxy for community-defined species value. Integrating structural, cultural, and socio-economic indices provides a more comprehensive framework for identifying priority species in community-managed forest systems. The IVI–UVI–SEVI comparative approach offers practical insights for model forest governance by distinguishing ecological dominants, multipurpose livelihood species, and culturally significant taxa occurring outside forest interiors. This multidimensional valuation framework strengthens participatory forest management and biodiversity prioritization in heterogeneous tropical landscapes.

Community-Based Fire Management (CBFiM) integrates local governance and ecological stewardship, yet the social drivers shaping its effectiveness remain poorly understood. This study examines the relationships among leadership perception, community participation, and surface fuel conditions in two community forests in Lampang Province, northern Thailand: Ban Pong and Ban Rong Ta. Forest floor fuel data were collected through destructive fuel sampling during the 2025 dry season, and social data were gathered through structured questionnaires measuring leadership perception using the Crew Member Perceived Leadership Scale and participation across seven fire management activities. Ban Rong Ta showed lower fuel loads but higher fire occurrence (nine fire detections recorded in 9 of 10 study years), lower leadership perception across all dimensions, and reduced participation in activities. The brigade–community participation gap reflects patterns documented across Southeast Asian community forestry programs, pointing to a structural challenge in fire governance. These findings suggest that awareness and informational participation alone do not reduce wildfire risk, and that integrating social and ecological indicators is essential for designing effective community-based fire governance systems.