Garbe Garbe

Dr. Garbe Garbe


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

6Years (2021-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
13 October 2021 in Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GGGarbe Garbe
Garbe Garbe
CSC Schäfer
C Schäfer
APA Pilz
A Pilz
FSF Schmidt
F Schmidt
KRK Raberger
K Raberger
GKG Keyßer
G Keyßer
Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV) is a complex, chronic autoimmune disease, and its diagnosis triggers considerable anxiety and uncertainty for those affected....

1 November 2021 in Pancreas
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GGGarbe Garbe
Garbe Garbe
GKGernot Keysser
Gernot Keysser
CSChristoph Schäfer
Christoph Schäfer
JGJakob Garbe
Jakob Garbe

14 June 2024 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GGGarbe Garbe
Garbe Garbe
KRKatja Raberger
Katja Raberger
AWAndreas Wienke
Andreas Wienke
GKGernot Keyßer
Gernot Keyßer
CSChristoph Schäfer
Christoph Schäfer
Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a multifaceted disease, and its diagnosis triggers substantial anxiety and uncertainty for those affected. Currently, there are no valid data describing the impact of disease-specific patient education on the disease knowledge available. We created a two-day, online educational seminar to provide SSc patients with disease-specific information. The primary objective of the study was to observe the change in the disease-specific knowledge of the patients. A total of 118 patients were randomized into an intervention group and a waiting list control group. The change in knowledge was assessed using a multiple-choice test. The intervention group completed the questionnaire before, directly after, and 3 months after the seminar, while the waiting list control group also took the test 3 months before the seminar to rule out nonspecific learning. The primary outcome measure was the score difference between baseline and 3 months after baseline. The study was registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (protocol code DRKS00024915). The educational seminar resulted in a small, but measurable, increase in knowledge. While the two tests in the waiting list control group prior to the seminar did not show a nonspecific increase in disease knowledge, the intervention led to a numerical increase in knowledge (mean ± sd score difference 0.34 ± 1.31, 95% CI (− 0.23; 0.86), p = 0.26) that did not reach statistical significance. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that being a member of a self-help group (β = 1.12; p = 0.03) is a positive predictor of a higher disease knowledge. Although highly appreciated by participants, a two-day online seminar may not be the most appropriate format to generate measurable disease-specific knowledge. Self-help group membership was a positive predictor of a higher level of disease-specific knowledge prior to the educational seminar and should be recommended to every affected person.

30 April 2026 in Healthcare
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CSChristoph Schäfer
Christoph Schäfer
GGGarbe Garbe
Garbe Garbe
FSFlorian Schmidt
Florian Schmidt
ASAnnika Seider
Annika Seider
KRKatja Raberger
Katja Raberger
GKGernot Keysser
Gernot Keysser
Objective: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complex autoimmune disease, and its diagnosis can cause considerable anxiety and uncertainty for those affected. This study aimed to investigate the effect of a one-day educational seminar on disease-specific knowledge among patients with SLE. Additionally, the influence on subjective needs, the cognitive and emotional impact of the disease, and health-related lifestyle were examined. Methods: Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to an intervention group or a waiting list control group. Both groups attended the seminar. Disease-specific knowledge was measured using a multiple-choice questionnaire. The primary objective was the change in knowledge after the intervention. Results: Thirty-nine participants were included in the analysis. The mean score difference between the waiting list control group and the intervention group was 3.4 points out of a maximum of 20 (95% CI 1.8 to 5) immediately after the seminar and 1.6 (95% CI −0.6 to 3.5) three months later. Pooled data from both groups showed an increase in SLE-specific knowledge from 13.7 points to 17.3 points. Three months later, SLE-specific knowledge remained above the initial value at 15.4 points. However, no influence on lifestyle was observed. Conclusion: A one-day seminar can increase disease-specific knowledge and reduce unmet informational needs but does not lead to lifestyle modifications.