Christine C. Roberts

Dr. Christine C. Roberts

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2009 in The Journal of Infectious Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DBDarron R. Brown
Darron R. Brown
SKSusanne K. Kjaer
Susanne K. Kjaer
KSKristján Sigurdsson
Kristján Sigurdsson
OIOle‐Erik Iversen
Ole‐Erik Iversen
MHMauricio Hernandez‐Avila
Mauricio Hernandez‐Avila
EBEliav Barr
Eliav Barr
BackgroundHuman papillomavirus (HPV)–6/11/16/18 vaccine reduces the risk of HPV-6/11/16/18–related cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 1–3 or ad

3 March 2010 in JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NMNubia Muñoz
Nubia Muñoz
SKSusanne K. Kjaer
Susanne K. Kjaer
KSKristján Sigurdsson
Kristján Sigurdsson
OIOle-Erik Iversen
Ole-Erik Iversen
MHMauricio Hernandez-Avila
Mauricio Hernandez-Avila
RHRichard M. Haupt
Richard M. Haupt
The impact of the prophylactic vaccine against human papillomavirus (HPV) types 6, 11, 16, and 18 (HPV6/11/16/18) on all HPV-associated genital disease was investigated in a population that approximates sexually naive women in that they were “negative to 14 HPV types” and in a mixed population of HPV-exposed and -unexposed women (intention-to-treat group). This analysis studied 17 622 women aged 15–26 years who were enrolled in one of two randomized, placebo-controlled, efficacy trials for the HPV6/11/16/18 vaccine (first patient on December 28, 2001, and studies completed July 31, 2007). Vaccine or placebo was given at day 1, month 2, and month 6. All women underwent cervicovaginal sampling and Papanicolaou (Pap) testing at day 1 and every 6–12 months thereafter. Outcomes were any cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; any external anogenital and vaginal lesions; Pap test abnormalities; and procedures such as colposcopy and definitive therapy. Absolute rates are expressed as women with endpoint per 100 person-years at risk. The average follow-up was 3.6 years (maximum of 4.9 years). In the population that was negative to 14 HPV types, vaccination was up to 100% effective in reducing the risk of HPV16/18-related high-grade cervical, vulvar, and vaginal lesions and of HPV6/11-related genital warts. In the intention-to-treat group, vaccination also statistically significantly reduced the risk of any high-grade cervical lesions (19.0% reduction; rate vaccine = 1.43, rate placebo = 1.76, difference = 0.33, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.13 to 0.54), vulvar and vaginal lesions (50.7% reduction; rate vaccine = 0.10, rate placebo = 0.20, difference = 0.10, 95% CI = 0.04 to 0.16), genital warts (62.0% reduction; rate vaccine = 0.44, rate placebo = 1.17, difference = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.58 to 0.87), Pap abnormalities (11.3% reduction; rate vaccine = 10.36, rate placebo = 11.68, difference = 1.32, 95% CI = 0.74 to 1.90), and cervical definitive therapy (23.0% reduction; rate vaccine = 1.97, rate placebo = 2.56, difference = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.35 to 0.83), irrespective of causal HPV type. High-coverage HPV vaccination programs among adolescents and young women may result in a rapid reduction of genital warts, cervical cytological abnormalities, and diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. In the longer term, substantial reductions in the rates of cervical, vulvar, and vaginal cancers may follow.

1 November 2017 in The Lancet
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
WHWarner K Huh
Warner K Huh
EJElmar A Joura
Elmar A Joura
AGAnna R Giuliano
Anna R Giuliano
OIOle-Erik Iversen
Ole-Erik Iversen
RARosires Pereira de Andrade
Rosires Pereira de Andrade
ALAlain Luxembourg
Alain Luxembourg

1 September 2019 in The Lancet Infectious Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KMKayvon Modjarrad
Kayvon Modjarrad
CRChristine C. Roberts
Christine C. Roberts
KMKristin T Mills
Kristin T Mills
ACAmy R Castellano
Amy R Castellano
KPKristopher Paolino
Kristopher Paolino
JMJoel N Maslow
Joel N Maslow

1 October 2009 in Cancer Prevention Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SKSusanne K. Kjaer
Susanne K. Kjaer
KSKristján Sigurdsson
Kristján Sigurdsson
OIOle-Erik Iversen
Ole-Erik Iversen
MHMauricio Hernandez-Avila
Mauricio Hernandez-Avila
CWCosette M. Wheeler
Cosette M. Wheeler
RHRichard M. Haupt
Richard M. Haupt
Quadrivalent human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine has been shown to provide protection from HPV 6/11/16/18–related cervical, vaginal, and vulvar disease through 3 years. We provide an update on the efficacy of the quadrivalent HPV vaccine against high-grade cervical, vaginal, and vulvar lesions based on end-of-study data from three clinical trials. Additionally, we stratify vaccine efficacy by several baseline characteristics, including age, smoking status, and Papanicolaou (Pap) test results. A total of 18,174 females ages 16 to 26 years were randomized and allocated into one of three clinical trials (protocols 007, 013, and 015). Vaccine or placebo was given at baseline, month 2, and month 6. Pap testing was conducted at regular intervals. Cervical and anogenital swabs were collected for HPV DNA testing. Examination for the presence of vulvar and vaginal lesions was also done. Endpoints included high-grade cervical, vulvar, or vaginal lesions (CIN 2/3, VIN 2/3, or VaIN 2/3). Mean follow-up time was 42 months post dose 1. Vaccine efficacy against HPV 6/11/16/18–related high-grade cervical lesions in the per-protocol and intention-to-treat populations was 98.2% [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 93.3-99.8] and 51.5% (95% CI, 40.6-60.6), respectively. Vaccine efficacy against HPV 6/11/16/18–related high-grade vulvar and vaginal lesions in the per-protocol and intention-to-treat populations was 100.0% (95% CI, 82.6-100.0) and 79.0% (95% CI, 56.4-91.0), respectively. Efficacy in the intention-to-treat population tended to be lower in older women, women with more partners, and women with abnormal Pap test results. The efficacy of quadrivalent HPV vaccine against high-grade cervical and external anogenital neoplasia remains high through 42 months post vaccination.

16 September 2021 in New England Journal of Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PTPablo Tebas
Pablo Tebas
CRChristine C. Roberts
Christine C. Roberts
KMKar Muthumani
Kar Muthumani
EREmma L. Reuschel
Emma L. Reuschel
SKSagar B. Kudchodkar
Sagar B. Kudchodkar
JMJoel N. Maslow
Joel N. Maslow
Although Zika virus (ZIKV) infection is typically self-limiting, other associated complications such as congenital birth defects and the Guillain–Barré syndrome are well described. There are no approved vaccines against ZIKV infection. In this phase 1, open-label clinical trial, we evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of a synthetic, consensus DNA vaccine (GLS-5700) encoding the ZIKV premembrane and envelope proteins in two groups of 20 participants each. The participants received either 1 mg or 2 mg of vaccine intradermally, with each injection followed by electroporation (the use of a pulsed electric field to introduce the DNA sequence into cells) at baseline, 4 weeks, and 12 weeks. The median age of the participants was 38 years, and 60% were women; 78% were white, and 22% black; in addition, 30% were Hispanic. At the interim analysis at 14 weeks (i.e., after the third dose of vaccine), no serious adverse events were reported. Local reactions at the vaccination site (e.g., injection-site pain, redness, swelling, and itching) occurred in approximately 50% of the participants. After the third dose of vaccine, binding antibodies (as measured on enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) were detected in all the participants, with geometric mean titers of 1642 and 2871 in recipients of 1 mg and 2 mg of vaccine, respectively. Neutralizing antibodies developed in 62% of the samples on Vero-cell assay. On neuronal-cell assay, there was 90% inhibition of ZIKV infection in 70% of the serum samples and 50% inhibition in 95% of the samples. The intraperitoneal injection of postvaccination serum protected 103 of 112 IFNAR knockout mice (bred with deletion of genes encoding interferon-α and interferon-β receptors) (92%) that were challenged with a lethal dose of ZIKV-PR209 strain; none of the mice receiving baseline serum survived the challenge. Survival was independent of the neutralization titer. In this phase 1, open-label clinical trial, a DNA vaccine elicited anti-ZIKV immune responses. Further studies are needed to better evaluate the safety and efficacy of the vaccine. (Funded by GeneOne Life Science and others; ZIKA-001 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02809443.)