Nanjian Xu

Dr. Nanjian Xu


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

4Years (2023-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
29 November 2023 in International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LWLinguo Wan
Linguo Wan
NXNanjian Xu
Nanjian Xu
XWXiaodong Wu
Xiaodong Wu
MLMujie Liu
Mujie Liu
YLYong Liu
Yong Liu
YWYuheng Wang
Yuheng Wang

21 April 2025 in Journal of Ethnopharmacology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LHLiping Huang
Liping Huang
FZFangfang Zhang
Fangfang Zhang
YWYuyu Wang
Yuyu Wang
JWJunke Wu
Junke Wu
RWRui Wang
Rui Wang
YLYubo Li
Yubo Li

12 July 2024 in Journal of Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PCPeng Cheng
Peng Cheng
JYJun Yang
Jun Yang
SWSong Wu
Song Wu
LXLinlin Xie
Linlin Xie
YXYong Xu
Yong Xu
YXYafeng Xu
Yafeng Xu
1. Damaged cartilage’s limited self-healing capability arises from the absence of blood vessels, nerves, and lymphatics, coupled with a dense extracellular matrix (ECM) [1–3]. Clinically, achieving...

25 September 2026 in Operative Neurosurgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ZPZhimin Pan
Zhimin Pan
JLJun Liu
Jun Liu
YZYongfei Zhao
Yongfei Zhao
XYXin Yin
Xin Yin
JWJeffrey Wang
Jeffrey Wang
HYHaoqun Yao
Haoqun Yao
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Atlantoaxial dislocation (AAD) is a high-risk condition that can lead to significant mortality. Lateral mass fusion offers structural stability and reduction, yet no standardized fusion device currently exists for consistent atlantoaxial fixation. This study compares the clinical outcomes of a novel anatomic cage vs iliac crest autograft in treating AAD. METHODS: Radiographic, laboratory, and clinical outcomes were retrospectively compared between 2 surgical groups: one treated with an iliac crest autograft by a traditional posterior approach, the other treated with an anatomic cage using an intermuscular approach. Health-related quality-of-life factors were also analyzed. RESULTS: One hundred nineteen patients underwent fusion with iliac crest autograft and 105 with anatomic cages were finally included. The iliac crest group had a shorter operative time ( P = .043), but the anatomic cage group had significantly less intraoperative blood loss, shorter hospitalization, and fewer C2 neurological symptoms (all P < .05). Bony fusion was similar between 2 groups (3.3 [0.6] months vs 3.1 [0.4] months, P = .163). Compared with the iliac crest group, the anatomic cage group showed greater improvements in lateral mass interspace height (LMIH, P < .001). Inflammatory markers were significantly lower at postoperative day 3 in the anatomic cage group. Improvement in pain (Visual Analog Scale) differed significantly between groups (Δ P <.001). Regression analysis showed that age <55 years was independently associated with greater Neck Disability Index improvement ( P = .025), while C1-C2 Cobb angle and cervicomedullary angle correlated with postoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association and Neck Disability Index scores. LMIH was significantly associated with C2 neurological symptoms ( P = .015). CONCLUSION: Lateral mass fusion using the 3-dimensional–printed anatomic cages by an intermuscular approach is a safe and effective treatment of AAD. It offers improved radiological outcomes, preserves C2 nerve root integrity, and reduces early postoperative inflammation. In addition, intraoperative restoration of LMIH may reduce neurological symptoms in patients with AAD.

28 May 2025 in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
XLXinyu Liu
Xinyu Liu
MCMinghui Cai
Minghui Cai
SWShuang Wei
Shuang Wei
RWRui Wang
Rui Wang
NXNanjian Xu
Nanjian Xu
YWYuming Wang
Yuming Wang