Soil salinization is a significant global threat to sustainable agricultural development, with soil salinity serving as a crucial indicator for evaluating soil salinization. Remote sensing technology enables large-scale inversion of soil salinity, facilitating the monitoring and assessment of soil salinization levels, thus supporting the prevention and management of soil salinization. This study employs multi-source remote sensing data, selecting 8 radar polarization combinations, 10 spectral indices, and 3 topographic factors to form a feature variable dataset. By applying a normalized weighted variable optimization method, highly important feature variables are identified. AdaBoost, LightGBM, and CatBoost machine learning methods are then used to develop soil salinity inversion models and evaluate their performance. The results indicate the following: (1) There is generally a strong correlation between radar polarization combinations and vegetation indices, and a very high correlation between various vegetation indices and the salinity index S3. (2) The top five feature variables, in order of importance, are Aspect, VH², Normalized Difference Moisture Index (NDMI), VH, and Vegetation Moisture Index (VMI). (3) The method of normalized weighted importance scoring effectively screens important variables, reducing the number of input feature variables while enhancing the model’s inversion accuracy. (4) Among the three machine learning models, CatBoost performs best overall in soil salt content (SSC) prediction. Combined with the top five feature variables, CatBoost achieves the highest prediction accuracy (R² = 0.831, RMSE = 2.653, MAE = 1.034) in the prediction phase. This study provides insights for the further development and application of methods for collaborative inversion of soil salinity using multi-source remote sensing data.

Aerosol optical depth (AOD) and Ångström exponent (AE) are critical parameters for characterizing atmospheric aerosols, playing a pivotal role in atmospheric environmental monitoring and climate change studies. This study addressed the imperative need for a systematic evaluation of mainstream reanalysis products by conducting a comprehensive multi-scale assessment of the CAMS and MERRA-2 datasets (2003–2023), encompassing data quality verification, spatiotemporal pattern analysis, and trend evolution investigation. The following key findings emerge: (1) Both AOD data exhibited the best performance observed in low–mid latitudes. CAMS AOD (AODC) showed a slightly better correlation, while MERRA-2 AOD (AODM) demonstrated superior robustness. Both AE data performed similarly, and MERRA-2 AE (AEM) was superior. Both AE data performed better in low latitudes and near Europe. (2) CAMS and MERRA-2 showed good performance in annual and seasonal variations, with significant fluctuations and biases in the annual cycle. Both models achieved the highest AE performance in summer. MERRA-2 AOD demonstrated better hourly performance during daytime. The hourly stability of AE was slightly worse than AOD, with notably degraded performance during midday hours. (3) The distribution and trends of AOD over land showed spatial consistency. The distribution of AEM was generally lower than AEC’s. After ensemble empirical mode decomposition (EEMD), all datasets showed monotonically decreasing trends except for AEM. This study provides valuable insights into the strengths and limitations for CAMS and MERRA-2 and suggests possible areas for improvement in future data assimilation and parameterization.