Background: The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) system for HCC was updated in 2022. The aim of the study was to assess the suitability and impact on overall survival (OS) of BCLC_2022, along with “clinical decision-making” (CDM), using BCLC_2018 as a benchmark. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 798 patients with de novo HCC followed prospectively from 2006 to 2022: 187 in BCLC 0, 371 in A, 132 in B, 87 in C, and 21 in D, all managed by a multidisciplinary team. Patients were followed until death or at the end of the follow-up period in December 2022. Results: The suitability of the algorithm increased from 51% for BCLC_2018 to 69% for BCLC_2022 (p<0.001). Among those treated with the newly introduced “lower priority options,” 22% were in BCLC 0 and 37% in A, showing lower rates of complete response (CR) and shorter OS compared to first-line treatments. In BCLC 0 and A, CDM was associated with a significant decrease in “downward stage migration” with BCLC_2022 (from 33% to 16%, p<0.001). Conversely, in BCLC B and C, “upward stage migration” correlated with higher CR rates and longer OS [63 (36–72) vs. 28 (18–44) months, p=0.003 in BCLC B; 21 (15–44) vs. 11 (4–25) months, p200 ng/mL, Child–Pugh score C, advanced BCLC stage, and noncurative treatment. Conclusions: BCLC_2022 and CDM provide greater flexibility in clinical practice without adversely affecting patient survival. Access to curative treatments improves the outcomes of selected patients in all stages.

Rare liver diseases caused by ductal plate malformation, such as congenital hepatic fibrosis (CHF), Caroli syndrome, and polycystic liver disease, can have clinical manifestations such as recurrent cholangitis—frequently involving multidrug-resistant microorganisms—leading to difficulties in selecting the optimal antimicrobial treatment. Without prompt recognition, these infections severely hamper the patient’s quality of life and can develop into life-threatening complications. We report here the case of a 50-year-old woman with a history of recurring cholangitis with occasional systemic involvement leading to bloodstream infection, who ultimately received a diagnosis of CHF and was put on chronic suppressive antibiotic therapy while on the waiting list for a liver transplant. We also reviewed the literature collecting cases of recurrent infections occurring in patients with ductal plate malformation.

Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is associated with numerous extra-hepatic complications, including neurological and renal manifestations. We describe the case of a 67-year-old Caucasian man with HCV-associated cryoglobulinemic glomerulonephritis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. The early posttransplant course was complicated by fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis due to recurrent HCV in the graft (HCV RNA up to 44,944,438 IU/mL). Proliferative glomerulonephritis (nephritic and nephrotic syndrome) with mixed cryoglobulinemia (purpura) was also recorded. Seventy-two days after surgery, the patient presented with seizures and arterial hypertension; brain magnetic resonance imaging indicated the diagnosis of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES). PRES responded well to medical treatment with complete resolution of neurological changes. Antiviral therapy (sofosbuvir and ribavirin, six months) gave a sustained viral response with the improvement of cryoglobulinemic symptoms (including glomerular disease). Repeat liver biopsy revealed the regression of cholestatic damage and perisinusoidal fibrosis. The current follow-up shows stable chronic renal failure (serum creatinine: 1.4 mg/dL) and mild nephritic syndrome. The impact of extrahepatic manifestations of HCV on patient outcomes is highlighted from novel observational studies reporting a relationship between HCV cure (as expressed by the sustained viral response) and a decrease in both liver-related and renal complications. Clinical trials evaluating the efficacy and tolerance of novel direct-acting antiviral agents for the management of HCV-associated glomerular diseases are underway.

The outcome of liver transplantation (LT) for hepatocarcinoma (HCC) is strongly influenced by HCC staging, which is based on radiological examinations in a pre-LT setting; concordance between pre-LT radiological and definitive pathological staging remains controversial. To address this issue, we retrospectively analyzed our LT series to assess concordance between radiology and pathology and to explore the factors associated with poor concordance and outcomes. We included all LTs with an HCC diagnosis performed between 2013 and 2018. Concordance (Co group) was defined as a comparable tumor burden in preoperative imaging and post-transplant pathology; otherwise, non-concordance was diagnosed (nCo group). Concordance between radiology and pathology was observed in 32/134 patients (Co group, 24%). The number and diameter of the nodules were higher when nCo was diagnosed, as was the number of pre-LT treatments. Although concordance did not affect survival, more than three pre-LT treatments led to a lower disease-free survival. Patients who met the Milan Criteria (Milan-in patients) were more likely to receive ≥three prior treatments, leading to a lower survival in multi-treated Milan-in patients than in other Milan-in patients. In conclusion, the concordance rate between the pre-LT imaging and histopathological results was low in patients with a high number of nodules. Multiple bridging therapies reduce the accuracy of pre-LT imaging in predicting HCC stages and negatively affect outcomes after LT.

Background and aims: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients frequently present with comorbidities that limit therapeutic options and increase mortality. This study evaluated the performance of the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and a modified CCI (mCCI) in stratifying patients with HCC to predict treatment allocation and survival. Methods: A retrospective single-center cohort study analyzed 401 patients with de novo HCC (74% male, median age 68 years, 80% Child–Pugh-Turcotte (CPT) A, 65% viral etiology, 70% Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage (BCLC) 0/A). CCI and mCCI (with points related to HCC and chronic liver disease excluded), were calculated at diagnosis for each patient. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) estimated by Kaplan–Meier method and compared across mCCI classes; Cox uni/multivariable models were applied to identify predictors of mortality. The secondary aim was evaluating the association between mCCI and treatment allocation. Results: While CCI classified 94% of patients as “high-risk”, mCCI reclassified patients into “high-risk” (21%), “intermediate-risk” (48%), and “low-risk” (31%), demonstrating better stratification whilst maintaining a strong correlation with CCI (Kendall’s tau-b = 0.57, p < 0.001). BCLC B patients with “high-risk” mCCI exhibited significantly lower access to first-line curative treatment (14% vs. 47%, p = 0.03). Moreover, “high” or “intermediate-risk” patients according to mCCI experienced significantly shorter OS compared to “low-risk” (median OS 36 vs. 49 vs. 74 months, p < 0.001). “High-risk” and “intermediate-risk” mCCI classes were independent predictors of mortality, alongside alpha-fetoprotein, CPT and BCLC stage. Considering the items composing mCCI, age and cardiovascular diseases were independent predictors of mortality. Conclusions: mCCI provides a more accurate assessment of comorbidities than the standard CCI and is associated with survival, hence it can contribute to designing patient-tailored therapeutic strategies.