Objective: The objective of this review is to examine the effectiveness of oral hygiene care in the management of oral symptoms in patients with cancer under specialist palliative care and the patients’ experience of such symptoms and care. Introduction: Oral symptoms, such as xerostomia, mouth pain, or dysgeusia, are highly prevalent in patients with cancer under specialist palliative care. These symptoms have a negative effect on patients’ quality of life. Oral hygiene care can manage oral symptoms and could be improved with a more systematized approach, adequate guidelines, and training to properly integrate oral hygiene into the care provided in specialist palliative care. Inclusion criteria: This review will consider quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods studies on the effectiveness and experience of oral hygiene care intended to manage oral symptoms in patients with cancer aged 18 years or older, diagnosed with any type of cancer, under specialist palliative care. Methods: The search will be conducted in MEDLINE (PubMed), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Dentistry and Oral Sciences Source (EBSCOhost), and MedicLatina (EBSCOhost). Sources of unpublished studies and gray literature to be searched will include Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations and Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal. Studies in English, Portuguese, and Spanish published from 2000 to the present will be considered. Methodological quality of included studies will be assessed and data will be extracted. Synthesis and integration will follow the JBI segregated approach for mixed methods reviews. Review registration: PROSPERO CRD42023400554

Objective: The objective of this review was to examine the effectiveness of oral hygiene care for the management of oral symptoms in patients with cancer receiving specialist palliative care and the patients’ experience of oral symptoms and oral hygiene care. Introduction: Oral symptoms, such as xerostomia, mouth pain, or dysgeusia, are highly prevalent in patients with cancer receiving specialist palliative care. These symptoms negatively affect patients’ quality of life. Oral hygiene care can assist in the management of oral symptoms. This care could be improved with a more systematic approach, adequate guidelines, and training to properly integrate it into the care provided by specialist palliative care teams. Eligibility criteria: This review considered quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods studies on oral hygiene care for the management of oral symptoms in adult patients with cancer, aged 18 years or older, diagnosed with any type of cancer, receiving specialist palliative care. For the quantitative component, eligible studies measured the effectiveness of oral hygiene care, of any frequency or duration, using any valid method, for the management of oral symptoms. Oral hygiene care interventions were compared with standard care, another experimental care, or there was no comparison. For the qualitative component, eligible studies explored participants’ experiences of oral symptoms and the provision of oral hygiene care. Specialist palliative care was provided in several settings, including palliative care units, inpatient hospice, home palliative care teams, or day care centers. Methods: The search was conducted in PubMed (NLM), CINAHL Complete (EBSCOhost), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Dentistry and Oral Sciences Source (EBSCOhost), and MedicLatina (EBSCOhost). Sources of unpublished studies and gray literature searched included Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations and Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal. Studies in English, Portuguese, and Spanish from 2000 to October 2023 were considered. Methodological quality was assessed and data were extracted by 2 reviewers. Synthesis and integration followed the JBI convergent segregated approach for mixed methods reviews. Meta-analysis of quantitative studies was not possible and findings were reported narratively. Meta-aggregation was used to pool findings of qualitative studies. Results: Six studies (2 randomized controlled trials, 2 quasi-experimental studies, and 2 qualitative studies) were included, involving 451 participants. Studies that had a methodological quality of 75% or higher, based on affirmative answers in the respective critical assessment tool, were included in the review. Evidence indicated that oral hygiene care may be effective for the management of oral symptoms. Patients reported a reduction in oral symptoms, such as xerostomia, accompanied by a reduction of oral mucositis and retention of oral debris. One synthesized finding indicated that patients with cancer receiving specialist palliative care may experience oral symptoms that have detrimental effects on their physical and psychosocial well-being. Oral care may be performed by the patients themselves or by others, but is not seen as a priority by some patients. The integrated evidence supports that oral symptoms affect oral functions and that oral hygiene care may help manage several oral symptoms; however, due to the limited evidence, further integration was not possible. Conclusions: Patients with cancer receiving specialist palliative care experience a wide variety of oral symptoms that affect oral functions, psychosocial well-being, and quality of life. Although more robust evidence is needed, the available evidence indicates that regular oral hygiene care may help manage oral symptoms. Supplemental digital content: Translations of the review abstract are available in Spanish http://links.lww.com/SRX/A105 and Portuguese http://links.lww.com/SRX/A106.

Background/Objectives: Emergency Services (ESs) are highly demanding clinical settings where Nursing Practice Environments (NPEs) play a critical role in shaping professional- and care-related outcomes. International evidence suggests that unfavorable NPEs are associated with reduced job satisfaction, compromised care quality, and increased safety risks. This study aimed to describe NPEs and selected professional and care-related outcomes among ESs nurses in Portugal in 2018 and 2022. Methods: A descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted using data from two national surveys of ESs nurses collected in 2018 (n = 390) and 2022 (n = 434). Data were collected through an online questionnaire including the Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index (PES-NWI), measures of job satisfaction, intention to leave, perceived quality and safety of care, safety culture, incident occurrence, and missed nursing care. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize results across both samples. Results: NPEs were predominantly classified as unfavorable in both samples, with around 70% of nurses working in unfavorable environments. The most compromised dimensions were staffing and resource adequacy, nurses’ participation in hospital affairs, and nurse manager ability, leadership, and support of nurses. Job satisfaction was low in both samples, and a high proportion of nurses reported an intention to leave the organization. Differences were observed between samples in perceived quality and safety of care, incident occurrence, and missed nursing care, particularly in relational and autonomous interventions. Collegial nurse–physician relations emerged as the only favorable dimension in both samples. Conclusions: The findings indicate that NPEs in Portuguese ESs were predominantly unfavorable in both study periods, reflecting structural and organizational challenges. These findings may be associated with nurses’ professional outcomes and perceived care quality and safety, highlighting the importance of targeted organizational interventions to improve practice environments.

Information about the paper titled "INTERNATIONAL PROJECT ABOUT THE INTRODUCTION OF TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE ON MEDICINAL PLANTS AMONG STUDENTS OF HEALTH SCIENCES" at IATED Digital Library