Matthias Wilde

Prof. Dr. Matthias Wilde

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
6 September 2016 in International Journal of Science Education
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NHNatalia Hofferber
Natalia Hofferber
MBMelanie Basten
Melanie Basten
NGNadine Großmann
Nadine Großmann
MWMatthias Wilde
Matthias Wilde
Self-Determination Theory and Flow Theory propose that perceived autonomy fosters the positive qualities of motivation and flow-experience. Autonomy-support can help to maintain students’ motivation in very interesting learning activities and may lead to an increase in the positive qualities of motivation in less interesting learning activities. This paper investigates whether autonomy-supportive or controlling teaching behaviour influence students’ motivation and flow-experience in biology class. In study 1, 158 students of grade six worked on the adaptations of Harvest Mice (Micromys minutus) with living animals. The 153 sixth graders of study 2 dealt with the same content but instead worked with short films on laptops. Previous studies have shown that students perceive film sequences as less interesting than working with living animals. Students’ intrinsic motivation and flow-experience were measured at the end of the first and the third lesson. In study 1, autonomy-supportive teaching behaviour led to significant differences in students’ intrinsic motivation and flow-experience when compared to controlling teaching behaviour. In study 2, motivation and flow-experience were not always in line with theory. The positive effects of autonomy-supportive and the non-beneficial effects of the controlling teaching behaviour seem to be dependent on the interestingness of the teaching material.

14 February 2019 in International Journal of Science Education
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NGNadine Großmann
Nadine Großmann
MWMatthias Wilde
Matthias Wilde
Experimentation is a complex problem-solving process. In biology lessons, experiments involve creative thinking and open discovery; however, they still require some degree of instructional guidance. The right balance between discovery learning and instructional guidance depends substantially on students’ prior knowledge. Students with low prior knowledge in particular might have difficulties with conducting and understanding experiments. Incremental scaffolds might be a valuable tool to meditate between pure discovery and strong guidance while simultaneously taking learners’ individual knowledge and skills into account. In the current study, we examined the effects of incremental scaffolds (IncSc), no scaffolds (NoSc), and worked-out examples (WoEx) on students’ knowledge acquisition while doing inquiry-based experimentation with a special focus on students with low prior knowledge. In a pre-posttest design, 193 students (Mage = 13.02 ± 0.81 years) participated in a four-hour teaching unit on animals’ overwintering strategies. In the pre- and posttest, we assessed the students’ conceptual and procedural knowledge. Our results partially confirmed our hypotheses: Regarding the conceptual and procedural knowledge of all students, incremental scaffolds showed no additional benefit regarding students’ knowledge in the posttest when compared to working with no scaffolds or worked-out examples. For the students with low prior knowledge, working with incremental scaffolds led to higher conceptual and procedural knowledge after the teaching unit than working with worked-out examples.

31 January 2012 in International Journal of Science Education
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MWMatthias Wilde
Matthias Wilde
JHJona Samuel Hußmann
Jona Samuel Hußmann
SLSimone Lorenzen
Simone Lorenzen
AMAnnika Meyer
Annika Meyer
Christoph RandlerChristoph Randler
Christoph Randler
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of living animals on pupils’ intrinsic motivation and knowledge. Various studies from the late 1970s and 1980s stress the high effectiveness of authentic learning experiences in pupils’ knowledge acquisition. However, there are only few current empirical studies on this topic. The research question of our study is to assess whether the use of living animals in the biology classroom supports intrinsic motivation and knowledge acquisition. In a pre-/post-test design, 185 fifth graders received two different treatments: the experimental group (N = 74) was taught with living harvest mice (Micromys minutus) and the control group (N = 111) received lessons with the same content which was presented in short film clips on laptop computers. Knowledge acquisition was assessed with open-ended and closed questions, while intrinsic motivation was tested with an adapted version of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI). There were no differences in knowledge acquisition between the treatments. However, the results of the IMI showed significant differences in favour of the experimental group in interest/enjoyment, perceived competence, and perceived autonomy. Thus, living animals exert a positive influence on motivation.

31 July 2018 in Research in Science Education
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
NGNadine Großmann
Nadine Großmann
MWMatthias Wilde
Matthias Wilde

4 November 2020 in International Journal of Science Education
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LKL.-M. Kaiser
L.-M. Kaiser
NGNadine Großmann
Nadine Großmann
MWMatthias Wilde
Matthias Wilde
As biology education is obliged to enable students to acquire scientific literacy, long-lasting and sustainable learning is required. According to self-determination theory, such learning is based on self-determined motivation. Therefore, motivating students is a key issue of biology teaching. The present study investigated whether students’ quality of motivation depends on the extent to which their basic needs are satisfied. Initial studies confirmed a positive impact on biology learning in terms of perceived autonomy, competence, and relatedness. However, these studies (1) do not consider all three basic needs, (2) nor do they distinguish between all motivational regulation styles separately. A more fine-grained investigation is required. Thus, a cross-sectional study with 738 students was conducted. Structural analyses showed differing effects of the students’ perceived autonomy, competence, and relatedness on their motivational regulation. The perception of autonomy and competence were important predictors of intrinsic and identified regulation. However, while intrinsic regulation required mainly the perception of autonomy, identified regulation depended mainly on competence. Perceived relatedness had no predictive power. When it came to controlled regulations, only the perceived relatedness was a negative predictor of students’ introjected regulation. Regarding external regulation, neither perceived autonomy and competence nor relatedness were negative predictors.

26 February 2015 in Research in Science Education
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AMAnnika Meyer
Annika Meyer
KKKonstantin Klingenberg
Konstantin Klingenberg
MWMatthias Wilde
Matthias Wilde