Faruk SAYDAM

Dr. Faruk SAYDAM


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
14 March 2017 in Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FSFaruk Saydam
Faruk Saydam
İDİrfan Değirmenci
İrfan Değirmenci
ABAlparslan Birdane
Alparslan Birdane
MÖMahmut Özdemir
Mahmut Özdemir
TUTaner Ulus
Taner Ulus
HGHasan Veysi Güneş
Hasan Veysi Güneş

1 September 2020 in Journal of Oral Biosciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
OHOmer Hatipoğlu
Omer Hatipoğlu
FSFaruk Saydam
Faruk Saydam

1 May 2015 in Neuroscience Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SSSelva Moheb Saadat
Selva Moheb Saadat
İDİrfan Değirmenci
İrfan Değirmenci
SÖSerhat Özkan
Serhat Özkan
FSFaruk Saydam
Faruk Saydam
ZKZeynep Özdemir Köroğlu
Zeynep Özdemir Köroğlu
HGHasan Veysi Güneş
Hasan Veysi Güneş

15 July 2023 in Neurotoxicity Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TATülay Akan
Tülay Akan
YAYasemin Aydın
Yasemin Aydın
OKOrhan Tansel Korkmaz
Orhan Tansel Korkmaz
EUEmel Ulupınar
Emel Ulupınar
FSFaruk Saydam
Faruk Saydam

30 December 2019 in Dental and Medical Problems
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
OHOmer Hatipoğlu
Omer Hatipoğlu
FSFaruk Saydam
Faruk Saydam
Carbonic anhydrase VI (CA VI) is considered to greatly participate in the buffering of saliva, ion transport, the regulation of pH, secretory processes, and saliva production. Various studies have been conducted to investigate the relationship between CA VI and dental caries. The goal of this study was to make a meta-analysis of studies that examined the effects of the CA VI gene polymorphisms on dental caries. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement guide was followed. Electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library) were scanned by 2 independent researchers. The funnel plot, Egger's regression and Begg and Mazumdar's rank correlation test were used to determine publication bias. Cohen's d was used to measure the effect size. Four studies were included in the meta-analysis; a total of 3 polymorphisms (rs2274327, rs2274328, rs2274333) and a total of 13 polymorphism models were analyzed. According to Egger's regression and the Begg and Mazumdar's test, the meta-analysis had no significant publication bias (p > 0.05). The highest susceptibility effect was noticed in the rs2274328 (AA vs CC) model (d = 0.18; 95% CI (confidence interval): -1.77, 2.13), but this effect was not significant (p = 0.237), and the highest protective effect was observed in the rs2274328 (AA vs AC) model (d = -0.13, 95% CI: -1.36, 1.11), but this effect was not significant, either (p = 0.195). No association was found between any of the polymorphism models and dental caries (p > 0.05). Even though CA VI plays an important role in the buffering of saliva, it was shown that polymorphisms in the CA VI gene did not affect the process of dental caries.

30 June 2020 in Cumhuriyet Dental Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GTGul YILDIZ Yildiz Telatar
Gul YILDIZ Yildiz Telatar
FSFaruk Saydam
Faruk Saydam
Objectives: Studies report that gene polymorphisms associated with mineralization may change the structure of enamel and create a predisposition for developing dental caries. The aim of the study was to evaluate the VDR and TFIP11 gene variants in adults with caries experience and to investigate their interactions with the environmental factors. Materials and Methods: A total of 160 individuals at the age of 24-40 years were included in the study and they were assigned to two groups according to decayed-missing-filled teeth index (DMFT); namely the low caries experience (LCE, DMFT≤4) and high caries experience (HCE, DMFT> 9.13). DNA was isolated from buccal swab samples to genotype the VDR (TaqI; rs731236) and TFIP11 (rs5997096) gene variants. The real-time PCR was used for genotyping. The frequency of tooth brushing, carbohydrate intake, smoking, and the dental plaques were evaluated as environmental risk factors. Results: Between the caries groups and the distribution of the genotypes and alleles of the VDR rs731236 and TFIP11 rs5997096 gene variants were not statistically different. There was also no significant difference when homozygous, heterozygous, dominant, and recessive models were evaluated for the two variants. The frequency of tooth brushing was significantly higher in the LCE group. According to the regression analysis; the amount of plaque explained the high caries experience at a rate of 51.4%. Conclusions: The study findings indicated that common variants in the VDR and TFIP11 genes were not associated with high caries experiences in Turkish adults.