The Cheoeum vent field (CVF) is the first example of an inactive ultramafic-hosted seafloor massive sulphide (SMS) deposit identified in the middle part of the Central Indian Ridge. Here, we report on the detailed mineralogy and geochemistry of ultramafic-hosted sulphide sample atop a chimney, together with a few small fragments. Hydrothermal chimneys are characterised by high concentrations of Au (up to 17.8 ppm) and Sn (up to 1720 ppm). The sulphide mineralisation in the CVF shows (1) early precipitation of anhedral sphalerite and pyrite–marcasite aggregates under relatively low-temperature (< 250 °C) fluid conditions; (2) intensive deposition of subhedral pyrrhotite, isocubanite, chalcopyrite, Fe-rich sphalerite (Sp-III), and electrum from high-temperature (250–365 °C) and reduced fluids in the main mineralisation stage; and (3) a seawater alteration stage distinguished by the mineral assemblage of marcasite pseudomorphs, altered isocubanite phase, covellite, amorphous silica, and Fe-oxyhydroxides. Electrum (< 2 μm in size) is the principal form of Au mineralisation and is mainly associated with the main mineralisation stage. The consistently high fineness of electrum (801 to 909‰) is indicative of the selective saturation of Au over Ag in the fluid during high-temperature mineralisation, which differs from the Au mineralisation associated with typical basaltic-hosted hydrothermal systems on mid-ocean ridges. Tin is mainly substituted in structures of sphalerite, isocubanite, and chalcopyrite as a solid solution, and not as mineral inclusions. The continuously ascending hydrothermal fluids enable the early formed Sn-bearing sulphide to be dissolved and reprecipitated, producing significantly Sn-enriched replacement boundaries between isocubanite and Sp-III. This study suggests that Au–Sn mineralisation could be facilitated by the low redox potential of ultramafic-hosted hydrothermal systems such as in the CVF, which may be a common occurrence along slow-spreading mid-ocean ridges.

The critical metal contents of four types of seabed mineral resources, including a deep-sea sediment deposit, are evaluated as potential rare earth element (REE) resources. The deep-sea resources have relatively low total rare earth oxide (TREO) contents, a narrow range of TREO grades (0.049–0.185%), and show characteristics that are consistent with those of land-based ion adsorption REE deposits. The relative REO distributions of the deep-seabed resources are also consistent with those of ion adsorption REE deposits on land. REEs that are not part of a crystal lattice of host minerals within deep-sea mineral deposits are favorable for mining, as there is no requirement for crushing and/or pulverizing during ore processing. Furthermore, low concentrations of Th and U reduce the risk of adverse environmental impacts. Despite the low TREO grades of the deep-seabed mineral deposits, a significant TREO yield from polymetallic nodules and REE-bearing deep-sea sediments from the Korean tenements has been estimated (1 Mt and 8 Mt, respectively). Compared with land-based REE deposits, deep-sea mineral deposits can be considered as low-grade mineral deposits with a large tonnage. The REEs and critical metals from deep-sea mineral deposits are important by-products and co-products of the main commodities (e.g., Co and Ni), and may increase the economic feasibility of their extraction.

Cobalt-rich ferromanganese crusts (Fe–Mn crusts), potential economic resources for cobalt, nickel, platinum, and other rare metals, are distributed on the surface of seamounts, ridges, and plateaus. Distribution of Fe–Mn crust deposits and their geomorphological characteristics are prerequisites to selecting possible mining sites and to predicting the environmental impact of deep-sea mining activity. Here, we map the spatial distribution of Fe–Mn crust deposits on seamount summits and flanks in the Western Pacific using shipboard multibeam echo sounder (MBES) data and seafloor images from a deep-towed camera system (DCS) and evaluate the relationship between acoustic backscatter variations and the occurrence of Fe–Mn crusts. We find a positive correlation between high backscatter intensity, steep seabed slope gradients, and the occurrence of Fe–Mn crusts. However, our analysis was not effective to distinguish the spatial boundary between several seabed types that occur over small areas in mixed seabed zones, particularly where transition zones and discontinuous seabed types are present. Thus, we conclude that MBES data can be a valuable tool for constraining spatial distribution of Fe–Mn crust deposits over a large exploration area.

We report detailed mineralogy and geochemistry of hydrothermal mounds and chimneys in the TA25 West vent field (TA25 WVF), a newly discovered magmatic–hydrothermal system in the Tonga (Tofua) arc. Chimney samples are classified as sulfate- or sulfide-rich, based on major sulfide, sulfosalt, and sulfate minerals. The former type represents a simple mineral assemblage of predominance of anhydrite/gypsum + barite + pyrite, whereas the sulfide-rich chimneys show three different stages of mineralization with decreasing fluid temperature: sphalerite–pyrite dominated stage I, sphalerite–sulfosalts dominated stage II, and stage III is dominated by seawater alteration. Mound samples are characterized by sulfide assemblages and paragenesis similar to those of sulfide-rich samples, but abundant chalcopyrite indicates a relatively high-temperature mineralization. The chimney and mound samples are enriched in Au (average 9.2 ppm), Ag (297 ppm), As (1897 ppm), Sb (689 ppm), Hg (157 ppm), and Se (34.6 ppm). LA–ICP–MS and FE–TEM studies indicate that most of these elements occur in sulfides or sulfosalts in solid solution, although some occur as nanoparticles. This is mainly controlled by the combined effects of fluid conditions (temperature and redox state) and influx of ambient seawater. Petrography and trace-element compositions of sulfides and/or sulfosalts suggest that most concentrations of Au and Ag in the TA25 WVF result from the precipitation and/or adsorption of Au–Ag-bearing nanoparticles on rapidly crystallized sulfides, the substitution of Au and Ag in sulfide and/or sulfosalt minerals, and the saturation of Ag in hydrothermal fluids during late, relatively low-temperature mineralization (< 150 °C). The maximum measured temperature (242 °C) of venting fluids and calculated formation temperatures of sphalerite (229–267 ℃) are below the boiling temperature of seawater at the depths (966–1096 m) of the TA25 WVF, suggesting fluid boiling had little effect on Au–Ag-rich mineralization in the TA25 WVF. The presence of enargite–tetrahedrite–tennantite assemblages, high concentrations of magma-derived elements (e.g., Au, Ag, As, Sb, Hg, and Se), low δ³⁴S values (2.1 to 4.3‰) of sulfide minerals relative to the host rocks, and the distribution of CO₂-rich hydrothermal plumes (500 to 1000 ppm) suggest that the TA25 WVF is a submarine hydrothermal system influenced by a magmatic contribution in an arc setting. Our results indicate that the magmatic contribution is most likely to play an important role in supplying various metals, including Au and Ag, to the TA25 WVF. Subsequently, the rapid crystallization of sulfides induced by abundant fluid-seawater mixing significantly contributes to the precipitation of Au–Ag-rich mineralization.