Recent single-arm studies involving neoadjuvant camrelizumab, a PD-1 inhibitor, plus chemotherapy for resectable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (LA-ESCC) have shown promising results. This multicenter, randomized, open-label phase 3 trial aimed to further assess the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant camrelizumab plus chemotherapy followed by adjuvant camrelizumab, compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone. A total of 391 patients with resectable thoracic LA-ESCC (T1b-3N1-3M0 or T3N0M0) were stratified by clinical stage (I/II, III or IVA) and randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to undergo two cycles of neoadjuvant therapy. Treatments included camrelizumab, albumin-bound paclitaxel and cisplatin (Cam+nab-TP group; n = 132); camrelizumab, paclitaxel and cisplatin (Cam+TP group; n = 130); and paclitaxel with cisplatin (TP group; n = 129), followed by surgical resection. Both the Cam+nab-TP and Cam+TP groups also received adjuvant camrelizumab. The dual primary endpoints were the rate of pathological complete response (pCR), as evaluated by a blind independent review committee, and event-free survival (EFS), as assessed by investigators. This study reports the final analysis of pCR rates. In the intention-to-treat population, the Cam+nab-TP and Cam+TP groups exhibited significantly higher pCR rates of 28.0% and 15.4%, respectively, compared to 4.7% in the TP group (Cam+nab-TP versus TP: difference 23.5%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 15.1–32.0, P < 0.0001; Cam+TP versus TP: difference 10.9%, 95% CI 3.7–18.1, P = 0.0034). The study met its primary endpoint of pCR; however, EFS is not yet mature. The incidence of grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events during neoadjuvant treatment was 34.1% for the Cam+nab-TP group, 29.2% for the Cam+TP group and 28.8% for the TP group; the postoperative complication rates were 34.2%, 38.8% and 32.0%, respectively. Neoadjuvant camrelizumab plus chemotherapy demonstrated superior pCR rates compared to chemotherapy alone for LA-ESCC, with a tolerable safety profile. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry identifier: ChiCTR2000040034.

Background: To compare the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (neoCT) versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (neoCRT) followed by surgery for locally advanced resectable oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).Methods: This study is a multicentre, prospective, randomized-controlled, phase III clinical study. Eligible ESCC (staging: cT1N2M0 or cT2-3N0-2M0 (stage II/III, high-risk lesions in T2N0M0)) patients will be randomly assigned to either the experimental group (pembrolizumab with neoCT, n = 228) or the control group (neoCRT, n = 114) at a ratio of 2:1. Within 4–6 weeks after preoperative therapy, the McKeown procedure will be performed. Patients in the experimental group will also receive pembrolizumab alone as adjuvant therapy after surgery until 1 year or until the radiographically confirmed PD or other condition indicated for premature termination is observed. The primary endpoint is event-free survival (EFS). The secondary endpoints are 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), short-term outcomes, and quality of life.Discussion: This is the first prospectively randomized controlled trial designed to compare pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy as neoadjuvant therapy for resectable ESCC. According to our hypothesis, preoperative pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy will result in a better tumour response and prolong the survival of patients, with acceptable toxicity. This study started in December 2021, and the enrolment time is estimated to be 2 years.Trial Registration: This prospective study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04807673), March 2021.

Background: Currently, the role of immunotherapy in neoadjuvant setting for patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is gradually attracting attention. Few studies compared the efficacy of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (NICT) and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT). Our study aimed to compare treatment response and postoperative complications after NICT followed by surgery with that after conventional NCRT in patients with locally advanced ESCC.Methods: Of 468 patients with locally advanced ESCC, 154 received conventional NCRT, whereas 314 received NICT. Treatment response, postoperative complications and mortality between two groups were compared. Pathological response of primary tumor was evaluated using the Mandard tumor regression grade (TRG) scoring system. Pathological complete response (pCR) of metastatic lymph nodes (LNs) was defined as no viable tumor cell within all resected metastatic LNs. According to regression directionality, tumor regression pattern was summarized into four categories: type I, regression toward the lumen; type II, regression toward the invasive front; type III, concentric regression; and type IV, scattered regression. Inverse probability propensity score weighting was performed to minimize the influence of confounding factors.Results: After adjusting for baseline characteristics, the R0 resection rates (90.9% vs. 89.0%, P=0.302) and pCR (ypT0N0) rates (29.8% vs. 34.0%, P=0.167) were comparable between two groups. Patients receiving NCRT showed lower TRG score (P<0.001) and higher major pathological response (MPR) rate (64.7% vs. 53.6%, P=0.001) compared to those receiving NICT. However, NICT brought a higher pCR rate of metastatic LNs than conventional NCRT (53.9% vs. 37.1%, P<0.001). The rates of type I/II/III/IV regression patterns were 44.6%, 6.8%, 11.4% and 37.1% in the NICT group, 16.9%, 8.2%, 18.3% and 56.6% in the NCRT group, indicating a significant difference (P<0.001). Moreover, there were no significant differences in the incidence of total postoperative complications (35.8% vs. 39.9%, P=0.189) and 30-d mortality (0.0% vs. 1.1%, P=0.062).Conclusion: For patients with locally advanced ESCC, NICT showed a R0 resection rate and pCR (ypT0N0) rate comparable to conventional NCRT, without increased incidence of postoperative complications and mortality. Notablely, NICT followed by surgery might bring a promising treatment response of metastatic LNs.

Background: Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is a common gastrointestinal malignancy with poor patient prognosis. Current treatment for ESCC, including immunotherapy, is only beneficial for a small subset of patients. Better characterization of the tumor microenvironment (TME) and the development of novel therapeutic targets are urgently needed. Methods: In the present study, we hypothesized that integration of single-cell transcriptomic sequencing and large microarray sequencing of ESCC biopsies would reveal the key cell subtypes and therapeutic targets that determine the prognostic and tumorigenesis of ESCC. We characterized the gene expression profiles, gene sets enrichment, and the TME landscape of a microarray cohort including 84 ESCC tumors and their paired peritumor samples. We integrated single-cell transcriptomic sequencing and bulk microarray sequencing of ESCC to reveal key cell subtypes and druggable targets that determine the prognostic and tumorigenesis of ESCC. We then designed and screened a blocking peptide targeting Chemokine C–C motif ligand 18 (CCL18) derived from tumor associated macrophages and validated its potency by MTT assay. The antitumor activity of CCL18 blocking peptide was validated in vivo by using 4-nitroquinoline-1-oxide (4-NQO) induced spontaneous ESCC mouse model. Results: Comparative gene expression and cell–cell interaction analyses revealed dysregulated chemokine and cytokine pathways during ESCC carcinogenesis. TME deconvolution and cell interaction analyses allow us to identify the chemokine CCL18 secreted by tumor associated macrophages could promote tumor cell proliferation via JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway and lead to poor prognosis of ESCC. The peptide Pep3 could inhibit the proliferation of EC-109 cells promoted by CCL18 and significantly restrain the tumor progression in 4-NQO-induced spontaneous ESCC mouse model. Conclusions: For the first time, we discovered and validated that CCL18 blockade could significantly prevent ESCC progression. Our study revealed the comprehensive cell–cell interaction network in the TME of ESCC and provided novel therapeutic targets and strategies to ESCC treatment.

Background: The potential of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) as a reliable biomarker for relapse/metastasis early detection and prognosis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) after radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy (RT/CRT) initiation requires comprehensive investigation.Methods: Treatment‐naive locally advanced ESCC patients with available baseline plasma samples were prospectively enrolled from November 2018 to January 2020. RT/CRT was delivered with a simultaneous integrated boost of radiation dose. Serial plasma samples were collected at baseline (T₀), week 4 of RT/CRT (T₁), 1‐3 (T₂) and 3‐6 months post‐RT/CRT (T₃). ctDNA was analysed using next‐generation sequencing of 474 cancer‐relevant genes.Results: A total of 128 plasma samples from 40 eligible patients were analysed (median age: 64 [range: 40‐78], 88% males, 95% stage III/IV), and the median follow‐up time was 20.6 months (range: 12.2‐33.3). During the post‐RT/CRT surveillance including 36 patients, radiological progression was observed in 16 patients, and 69% (11/16) had detectable post‐RT/CRT ctDNA prior to radiological progression, with a median lead time of 4.4 months compared with radiological imaging. ctDNA positivity at T₁ (hazard ratio, HR: 3.60, 95% confidence interval, CI: 1.30‐10.01) or T₂ (HR: 5.45, 95% CI: 1.72‐17.26) indicated inferior progression‐free survival (PFS). ctDNA clearance between T₀‐T₁ (HR: 0.31, 95% CI: 0.08‐1.13) or T₀‐T₂ (HR: 0.11; 95% CI: 0.02‐0.61) was associated with relatively favourable PFS. Similar results were obtained when focusing on patients without esophagectomy after RT/CRT. Notably, detectable ctDNA at T₁ was a potential indicator of high local recurrence risks (HR: 4.43, 95% CI: 1.31‐15.04).Conclusions: ctDNA was identified as a robust biomarker for early detection of disease progression and post‐RT/CRT prognosis stratification in ESCC. Detectable ctDNA at week 4 of RT/CRT might indicate higher local recurrence risks, implying the potential clinical utility of ctDNA tests in guiding post‐RT/CRT treatments for locoregional control in ESCC.