Traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains a leading cause of mortality and disability in Colombia and other low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where disparities in resource availability limit implementation of standardized care. The first edition of BOOTStraP (Beyond One Option for Treatment of Traumatic Brain Injury: A Stratified Protocol), published in 2020, provided guidance for TBI management across variable healthcare settings. Advances in neurotrauma care prompted development of an updated protocol. How can TBI management be optimized across prehospital care, emergency care, neurosurgical surgery, and intensive care phases in settings with varying resource availability? A multidisciplinary panel of 17 national experts in prehospital care, emergency medicine, neurosurgery, and intensive care conducted a structured consensus process using Delphi principles and Nominal Group Technique. Eleven predefined clinical questions were addressed. Recommendations were developed through subgroup work, literature review, and iterative voting, requiring ≥70% agreement at subgroup level and ≥90% plenary consensus. Final algorithms were stratified according to resource availability and healthcare complexity. The second BOOTStraP edition produced 9 integrated management algorithms covering prehospital transport, emergency care, neurosurgical decision-making, and critical care. Interventions are stratified and color-coded by resource requirements, enabling feasible actions in low-, intermediate-, and high-resource settings. Algorithms integrate neuroprotection goals, triage criteria, surgical indications, and monitoring strategies. BOOTStraP provides a pragmatic, phase-based, resource-sensitive framework bridging evidence-based recommendations with real-world constraints. This approach supports context-adapted decision-making and may reduce secondary brain injury while improving standardization of TBI care in resource-limited environments.

Intracranial hypertension is a life-threatening complication of traumatic brain injury (TBI) and a major target in neurocritical care. While ventriculostomy for cerebrospinal fluid diversion and the emerging technique of cisternostomy are used on a regular basis in different areas of the world, their application is heterogeneous on indications, timing, and technical aspects in the surgical procedures. This variability highlights a critical lack of standardized protocols, particularly in resource-constrained environments where optimized recommendations are most needed. What are the specific, expert-consensus recommendations to standardize the use of ventriculostomy and cisternostomy within a protocol for TBI management? The Neurotrauma Committee of the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies develop an international consensus, including a methodological group and a panel of 16 expert neurosurgeons following a Delphi process, involving systematic literature review, statement formulation, and iterative blinded voting using a 5-point Likert scale. Consensus was predefined as ≥75% agreement. The panel ratified 69 consensus statements. Core recommendations advocate for ventriculostomy as an early therapeutic intervention for TBI requiring fluid drainage and define cisternostomy as an adjunctive procedure for selected patients with TBI and significant traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage. Protocols with algorithms were proposed for both procedures. This consensus provides a practical framework to guide surgical management of TBI using ventriculostomy and or cisternostomy as techniques. It promotes a strategic shift towards prior heterogeneous concepts on ventriculostomy and defines a specific, consensus-guided role for cisternostomy. The statements aim to harmonize global practice and direct future research.

Traditional surgical decision-making in traumatic brain injury (TBI) has relied on static intracranial pressure (ICP) thresholds and fixed volumetric criteria, an approach that inadequately reflects the dynamic physiological nature of secondary brain injury. These conventional metrics fail to capture the critical determinant of clinical deterioration: the progressive loss of intracranial compliance, the brain’s capacity to buffer additional volume without harmful pressure escalation. This manuscript proposes a practical, compliance-based framework for selecting precise, personalized surgical strategies using real-time physiological, imaging, and neuromonitoring indicators. Based on the Intracranial Compartment Syndrome (ICCS) model, this approach translates the loss of compensatory reserve into actionable operative decisions. Compliance is assessed through multimodal tools, including ICP waveform morphology, cerebral oxygenation, and complementary noninvasive neuromonitoring. ICCS staging delineates three operative contexts: Stage 1, preserved compliance; Stage 2, compliance failure with maintained oxygenation requiring physiology-guided interventions to restore buffering capacity; and Stage 3, global decompensation with lost of compliance plus oxygenation failure requiring immediate, aggressive intervention for partial or total brain tissue survival. By shifting surgical reasoning from fixed anatomical thresholds to a physiology-centered assessment of intracranial compliance, this framework aims to enhance the timing, selection, and overall effectiveness of neurosurgical interventions in TBI.