Christine Kelley-Patteson

Dr. Christine Kelley-Patteson

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
4 May 2022 in Journal of Immunology Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LSLily J. Suh
Lily J. Suh
IKImran Khan
Imran Khan
CKChristine Kelley-Patteson
Christine Kelley-Patteson
MMMohan Mohan
Mohan Mohan
AHAladdin H. Hassanein
Aladdin H. Hassanein
MSMithun Sinha
Mithun Sinha
Background. Breast implants are commonly placed postbreast cancer reconstruction, cosmetic augmentation, and gender-affirming surgery. Breast implant illness (BII) is a systemic complication associated with breast implants. Patients with BII may experience autoimmune symptoms including fatigue, difficulty concentrating, hair loss, weight change, and depression. BII is poorly understood, and the etiology is unknown. The purpose of this literature review is to characterize BII autoimmune disorders and determine possible causes for its etiology. Methods. The PubMed, Google Scholar, Embase, Web of Science, and OVID databases were interrogated from 2010 to 2020 using a query strategy including search term combinations of implants, breast implant illness, autoimmune, and systemic illness. Results. BII includes a spectrum of autoimmune symptoms such as fatigue, myalgias/arthralgias, dry eyes/mouth, and rash. A review of epidemiological studies in the past ten years exhibited evidence affirming an association between breast implants and autoimmune diseases. The most commonly recognized were Sjogrens syndrome, rheumatoid arthritis, systemic sclerosis, chronic fatigue syndrome, and Raynauds syndrome. Explantation resulted in alleviation of symptoms in over 50 of patients, strengthening the hypothesis linking breast implants to BII. Studies have shown that silicone is a biologically inert material and unlikely to be the cause of these symptoms. This is supported by the fact that increased risk of autoimmune disease was also reported in patients with other implantable biomaterials such as orthopedic implants. Recent studies shed light on a possible role of bacterial biofilm and subsequent host-pathogen interactions as a confounding factor to this problem. Conclusion. BII could be dependent on biofilm infection and the microenvironment around the implants. The true pathophysiology behind these complaints must be further investigated so that alternative treatment regimens other than explantation can be developed. Translational significance of these studies is not limited to breast implants but extends to other implants as well.

30 November 2023 in Journal of Clinical Investigation
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
IKImran Khan
Imran Khan
RMRobert E. Minto
Robert E. Minto
CKChristine Kelley-Patteson
Christine Kelley-Patteson
Kanhaiya SinghKanhaiya Singh
Kanhaiya Singh
LTLava Timsina
Lava Timsina
MSMithun Sinha
Mithun Sinha
This study investigates a mechanistic link of bacterial biofilm–mediated host-pathogen interaction leading to immunological complications associated with breast implant illness (BII). Over 10 million women worldwide have breast implants. In recent years, women have described a constellation of immunological symptoms believed to be related to their breast implants. We report that periprosthetic breast tissue of participants with symptoms associated with BII had increased abundance of biofilm and biofilm-derived oxylipin 10-HOME compared with participants with implants who are without symptoms (non-BII) and participants without implants. S. epidermidis biofilm was observed to be higher in the BII group compared with the non-BII group and the normal tissue group. Oxylipin 10-HOME was found to be immunogenically capable of polarizing naive CD4+ T cells with a resulting Th1 subtype in vitro and in vivo. Consistently, an abundance of CD4+Th1 subtype was observed in the periprosthetic breast tissue and blood of people in the BII group. Mice injected with 10-HOME also had increased Th1 subtype in their blood, akin to patients with BII, and demonstrated fatigue-like symptoms. The identification of an oxylipin-mediated mechanism of immune activation induced by local bacterial biofilm provides insight into the possible pathogenesis of the implant-associated immune symptoms of BII.

13 April 2026 in Antibiotics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PMPranay Amruth Maroju
Pranay Amruth Maroju
ASAngad Singh Sidhu
Angad Singh Sidhu
AMAmogh Motaganahalli
Amogh Motaganahalli
RMRobert E. Minto
Robert E. Minto
FZFatih Zor
Fatih Zor
MSMithun Sinha
Mithun Sinha
Bacterial biofilms are structured microbial communities enclosed within a self-produced extracellular polymeric substance matrix composed of polysaccharides, proteins, extracellular DNA, and lipids. This matrix promotes adhesion, structural stability, and the development of heterogeneous microenvironments that restrict antimicrobial penetration and shield bacteria from host immune responses. As a result, biofilms are major contributors to chronic, recurrent, device-related, and difficult-to-treat infections, posing a major challenge for clinical management and antimicrobial stewardship. This review summarizes current understandings of biofilm biology, its clinical relevance, including the stages of biofilm development, the composition and protective roles of the matrix, and the physiological heterogeneity that arises during maturation. It also examines key mechanisms underlying biofilm tolerance and resistance, such as limited antibiotic diffusion, and sequestration, enzymatic inactivation, efflux pump upregulation, persister cell formation, and horizontal gene transfer. In addition, it highlights important clinical settings in which biofilms are implicated, including cystic fibrosis, chronic wounds, osteomyelitis, implant- or device-associated infections, and breast implant illness, in which persistent implant-associated biofilms and the resulting chronic inflammatory milieu have been hypothesized to contribute to local and systemic manifestations in a subset of patients. The review further discusses conventional and emerging approaches for biofilm detection alongwith real-time monitoring. Biofilm-associated infections remain difficult to eradicate because persistence is driven by multiple interconnected protective mechanisms. Effective management therefore requires integrated strategies that combine accurate detection with multifaceted therapies, including antibiotics alongside matrix-disrupting enzymes, quorum-sensing inhibitors, bacteriophages, metabolic reactivators, and nanotechnology-based delivery systems. Advances in multi-omics and system-level modeling will be essential for developing next-generation strategies to prevent, monitor, and treat biofilm-associated disease.

20 November 2020 in medRxiv
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
IKImran Khan
Imran Khan
RMRobert E. Minto
Robert E. Minto
CKChristine Kelley-Patteson
Christine Kelley-Patteson
BNBruce W. Van Natta
Bruce W. Van Natta
CNColby R. Neumann
Colby R. Neumann
MSMithun Sinha
Mithun Sinha
Over 10 million women worldwide have breast implants for breast cancer/prophylactic reconstruction or cosmetic augmentation. In recent years, a number of patients have described a constellation of symptoms that are believed to be related to their breast implants. This constellation of symptoms has been named Breast Implant Illness (BII). The symptoms described include chronic fatigue, joint pain, muscle pain and a host of other manifestations often associated with autoimmune illnesses. In this work, we report that bacterial biofilm is associated with BII. We postulate that the pathogenesis of BII is mediated via a host-pathogen interaction whereby the biofilm bacteria Staphylococcus epidermidis interacts with breast lipids to form the oxylipin 10-HOME. The oxylipin 10-HOME was found to activate CD4 + T cells to Th1 subtype. An increased abundance of CD4 + Th1 was observed in the breast tissue of BII subjects. The identification of a mechanism of immune activation associated with BII via a biofilm enabled pathway provides insight into the pathogenesis for implant-associated autoimmune symptoms.