While climate change is increasingly being viewed as one of the most critical issues affecting the landscape design and horticultural industries today, research indicates that many current professionals feel unprepared to address climate change issues in their practice. This paper summarises a survey of faculty and students in post-secondary horticulture and landscape architecture/design programmes within the United States about existing practices of educating students (future professionals) about climate change, as well as perceived priority topics and information needs. Results identify areas where additional instructional resources may be needed, as well as climate-related topics receiving more emphasis than others. The study also identifies differences in student and faculty perceptions about the extent and importance of instruction in specific areas. Finally, this paper raises a number of unresolved questions regarding the underlying reasons for some topics receiving greater emphasis, and the potential implications from lack of emphasis on others.

Residential yards are underappreciated and under-studied urban ecosystems. While there is a slow paradigm change taking place for using native plants in urban landscapes, little is known about the perceptions and preferences for native landscapes and the inclination to use native plants in residential yards. For this study, two plots were designed and planted with native plants to resemble residential gardens, and site visit surveys were used to collect data. Likert scale and checkbox questions with additional written comments were used to assess perceptions and preferences on the aesthetics, maintenance, environmental value, and willingness to adopt a native plant garden. The results were mostly positive; a high majority of respondents found the yards aesthetically pleasing, well-maintained, and very good for the environment. Although perceptions were positive, the results for willingness to use native plants in their own yard were nearly equal between willing and not willing/neutral. However, a high majority stated their likelihood to use native plants would increase if they knew more about the ecological benefits. The knowledge gained from this study will help (1) designers to create ecology-based aesthetic landscapes, (2) policy-makers to craft ecology-focused landscape codes and ordinances, and (3) educators and advocates to target behaviors and preferences in educational materials and social marketing campaigns.