The leading causes of mortality and morbidity worldwide are cardiovascular disease (high blood pressure, high cholesterol and renal disease), cancer and diabetes. It is increasingly obvious that the development of these diseases encompasses complex interactions between adult lifestyle and genetic predisposition. Maternal malnutrition can influence the fetal and early life environment and pose a risk factor for the future development of adult diseases, most likely due to impaired organogenesis in the developing offspring. This then predisposes these offspring to cardiovascular disease and renal dysfunction in adulthood. Studies in experimental animals have further illustrated the significant impact maternal diet has on offspring health. Many studies report changes in kidney structure (a reduction in the number of nephrons in the kidney) in offspring of protein-deprived dams. Although the early studies suggested that increased blood pressure was also present in offspring of protein-restricted dams, this is not a universal finding and requires clarification. Importantly, to date, the literature offers little to no understanding of when in development these changes in kidney development occur, nor are the cellular and molecular mechanisms that drive these changes well characterised. Moreover, the mechanisms linking maternal nutrition and a suboptimal renal phenotype in offspring are yet to be discerned—one potential mechanism involves epigenetics. This review will focus on recent information on potential mechanisms by which maternal nutrition (focusing on malnutrition due to protein restriction, micronutrient restriction and excessive fat intake) influences kidney development and thereby function in later life.

The placenta is an essential organ that provides nutrients and oxygen to the developing fetus and removes toxic waste products from the fetal circulation. Maintaining placental blood osmotic pressure and blood flow is crucial for viable offspring. The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) in the placenta is a key player in the regulation of maternal-fetal blood flow during pregnancy. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine if RAS genes are differentially expressed in mid to late gestation in rat placenta. Whole placental tissue samples from pregnant Sprague Dawley rats at embryonic (E) days 14.25, 15.25, 17.25 and 20 (n = 6 for each gestational age) were used for genome-wide gene expression by microarray. RAS genes with expression differences of >2 fold were further analyzed. Quantitative Real-Time PCR (qPCR) was performed on independent samples to confirm and validate microarray data. Immunohistochemisty and Western blotting were performed on a differentially expressed novel RAS pathway gene (ANPEP). Six out of 17 genes of the RAS pathway were differentially expressed at different gestational ages. Gene expression of four genes (Angiotensin converting enzyme (Ace), angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (Ace2), membrane metalloendopeptidase (Mme) and angiotensin II receptor 1A (Agtr1a)) were significantly upregulated at E20 whereas two others (Thimet oligopeptidase 1 (Thop1) and Alanyl aminopeptidase (Anpep)) were downregulated at E20 prior to the onset of labour. These changes were confirmed by qPCR. Western blots revealed no overall differences in ANPEP protein expression in the placentae. Immunohistochemical studies, however, indicated that the localization of ANPEP differed at E17.25 and E20 as ANPEP localization in the giant trophoblast cell of the junctional zone was no longer detectable at E20. The current study investigated the expression of members of the RAS pathway in rat placentae and observed significantly altered expression of 6 RAS genes at 4 gestational ages. These findings present the need for further comprehensive investigation of RAS genes in normal and complicated pregnancies.

The evolution of digitally based pedagogies, such as extended reality (XR) - a group of simulated learning environments that include virtual simulation, virtual reality, and augmented reality - has prompted optometry educators to seek evidence to guide the implementation of these teaching and learning activities within their curricula. Looking more broadly across the medical and allied health fields, there is a wealth of evidence to guide the incorporation of XR, as it is increasingly being integrated into the curricula of other select health professions disciplines. Educators from these disciplines continue to explore and embed XR in practice. This narrative review summarises the findings and appraises the literature on the use of XR in optometry education. It identifies the learning domains in which XR has been implemented in optometry education and proposes areas for further investigation. The review questions the technology-focused approach that has driven the literature within the review and calls for richer pedagogical foundations with suggestions for future research agendas. As such, this narrative review provides optometry educators with new ways of understanding XR and its relationship with the curriculum.

A variety of training opportunities is key to ensuring optometry graduates are competent to practice optometry at its fullest scope. It is therefore important to understand how the geographic location of placements contributes to the volume and diversity of clinical experience gained by students. Research suggests optometry students and rural-based supervisors believe that rural placements offer students exposure to a wider variety of clinical experiences compared with metropolitan placements. However, to date there has been no formal analysis of whether students on rural placement gain a more diverse experience. This study aimed to compare the clinical experience gained by optometry students on rural versus metropolitan placement. Clinical experiences recorded in student electronic logbooks from 203 Deakin University optometry students undertaking a 26-week clinical placement were analysed. Differences between the numbers of patients seen, skills performed, and ocular conditions managed by students were compared by geographic location. Students experienced 12.2% more patient encounters on a rural placement than on metropolitan placement (mean ± SD, 341 ± 123 vs 304 ± 109, p < 0.002). On average, during rural placement, students encountered 49.6% more patients presenting with sore eyes (56.1 ± 37.5 vs 37.5 ± 24.6, p < 0.001) and 61.0% more instances of urgent, potentially sight-threatening eye conditions (8.5 ± 6.4 vs 5.9 ± 4.9, p < 0.001). Students on metropolitan placement encountered 33.2% more patients presenting for reasons related to contact lenses (26.1 ± 14.7 vs 19.6 ± 11.2, p < 0.001). Students encountered a greater total count of conditions on rural placement than metropolitan placements. However, there were some opportunities metropolitan placements offered which were limited on rural placements. It is important students are exposed to practice in both rural and metropolitan locations to ensure a breadth of clinical experience is encountered.