Eiichiro Toyokawa

Dr. Eiichiro Toyokawa

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

1Year (2026-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KYKaoru Yoshikawa
Kaoru Yoshikawa
AOAkira Ooki
Akira Ooki
ESEiji Shinozaki
Eiji Shinozaki
ETEiichiro Toyokawa
Eiichiro Toyokawa
KSKeito Suzuki
Keito Suzuki
HOHiroki Osumi
Hiroki Osumi
Perioperative treatment for colorectal cancer (CRC) is undergoing a paradigm shift from uniform cytotoxic regimens toward strategies guided by tumor location, microsatellite instability (MSI)/mismatch repair (MMR) status, and recurrence risk. Four clinically relevant subgroups now shape decision-making: microsatellite stable (MSS)/proficient MMR (pMMR) colon cancer, microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H)/deficient MMR (dMMR) colon cancer, MSS/pMMR rectal cancer, and MSI-H/dMMR rectal cancer. In MSS/pMMR colon cancer, adjuvant therapy is being refined through risk-adapted treatment duration and selective use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In MSS/pMMR rectal cancer, total neoadjuvant therapy, selective omission of pelvic radiotherapy, and watch-and-wait strategies are redefining treatment sequencing and organ preservation. In MSI-H/dMMR colon cancer, immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy has shown marked activity in both adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings. In MSI-H/dMMR rectal cancer, neoadjuvant ICI therapy is being explored as a non-operative organ preservation strategy. In parallel, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)-based minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment is emerging as a tool for postoperative escalation, de-escalation, and surveillance. Across these settings, the maturity of the evidence varies widely, ranging from established phase III standards to guideline-endorsed but still single-arm approaches and investigational strategies that require prospective validation before routine adoption. This review summarizes the current evidence and remaining challenges in biology-, site-, and risk-adapted perioperative management of CRC.

7 April 2026 in Biomolecules
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ETEiichiro Toyokawa
Eiichiro Toyokawa
AOAkira Ooki
Akira Ooki
ESEiji Shinozaki
Eiji Shinozaki
KYKaoru Yoshikawa
Kaoru Yoshikawa
KSKeito Suzuki
Keito Suzuki
HOHiroki Osumi
Hiroki Osumi
The emergence of novel cytotoxic agents, multikinase inhibitors, and various antibody-based therapies has significantly expanded salvage therapy options for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Consequently, establishing the optimal treatment sequence for patients has become a formidable clinical challenge. Emerging evidence highlights the value of comprehensive biomarker assessment, particularly longitudinal monitoring of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), to capture dynamic molecular changes during treatment. Liquid biopsy-based technologies now enable real-time tracking of molecular alterations, supporting truly personalized therapeutic decision-making. Furthermore, prior treatment exposure and residual toxicities must be carefully considered to balance efficacy, safety, and quality of life. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the current salvage-line landscape for mCRC, discusses the clinical utility of ctDNA as a predictive and prognostic tool, and proposes integrated strategies to optimize therapeutic outcomes in the evolving era of precision medicine.