Jayaprakash Vemuri

Mr. Jayaprakash Vemuri


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2018 in Cogent Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JVJayaprakash Vemuri
Jayaprakash Vemuri
SESyed Ehteshamuddin
Syed Ehteshamuddin
SKSubramaniam Kolluru
Subramaniam Kolluru
Unreinforced soft-brick masonry structures comprise a large portion of buildings in earthquake prone regions of India. Recent earthquakes have extensively damaged such structures. Experimental and numerical studies on soft brick unreinforced masonry structures are scarce in literature. In this paper, numerical simulation of soft brick unreinforced masonry panels subjected to lateral loads is performed. At the panel level, the masonry structure is modelled using the micro modelling approach within a finite element framework. Monotonic load envelope curve is generated through a pushover analysis of the finite element model. The in-plane failure modes are identified, and the effect of aspect ratio and axial stress on failure is examined. Cyclic load analyses are performed on the finite element model to understand the complex hysteretic behaviour of unreinforced soft-brick masonry walls.

31 August 2023 in International Journal of Structural Integrity
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FWFaisal Mehraj Wani
Faisal Mehraj Wani
JVJayaprakash Vemuri
Jayaprakash Vemuri
RCRajaram Chenna
Rajaram Chenna
Purpose: Near-fault pulse-like ground motions have distinct and very severe effects on reinforced concrete (RC) structures. However, there is a paucity of recorded data from Near-Fault Ground Motions (NFGMs), and thus forecasting the dynamic seismic response of structures, using conventional techniques, under such intense ground motions has remained a challenge.Design/methodology/approach: The present study utilizes a 2D finite element model of an RC structure subjected to near-fault pulse-like ground motions with a focus on the storey drift ratio (SDR) as the key demand parameter. Five machine learning classifiers (MLCs), namely decision tree, k-nearest neighbor, random forest, support vector machine and Naïve Bayes classifier , were evaluated to classify the damage states of the RC structure.Findings: The results such as confusion matrix, accuracy and mean square error indicate that the Naïve Bayes classifier model outperforms other MLCs with 80.0% accuracy. Furthermore, three MLC models with accuracy greater than 75% were trained using a voting classifier to enhance the performance score of the models. Finally, a sensitivity analysis was performed to evaluate the model's resilience and dependability.Originality/value: The objective of the current study is to predict the nonlinear storey drift demand for low-rise RC structures using machine learning techniques, instead of labor-intensive nonlinear dynamic analysis.

17 July 2023 in International Journal of Structural Integrity
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FWFaisal Mehraj Wani
Faisal Mehraj Wani
JVJayaprakash Vemuri
Jayaprakash Vemuri
RCRajaram Chenna
Rajaram Chenna
Purpose: The objective of the study is to examine the response of reinforced concrete (RC) structures subjected to Near-Fault Ground Motions (NFGM) and highlight the importance of considering various factors including the influence of the relative geographical position of near-fault sites that can affect the structural response during an earthquake.Design/methodology/approach: In this paper, the response of a four-storey RC building subjected to NFGMs with varied characteristics like hanging wall and footwall in conjunction with directivity and the effect of pulse-like ground motions with rupture direction are investigated to understand the combined influence of these factors on the behavior of the structure. Furthermore, the capacity and demand of the structural element are investigated for computing the performance ratio.Findings: Results from this study indicate that the most unfavorable combinations for structural damage due to near-fault ground motion are the hanging wall with forward rupture, the fault normal component of ground motions, and pulse-like ground motions with forward directivity.Originality/value: The results from this study provide valuable insight into the response of RC structures subjected to NFGM and highlight the importance of considering various factors that can affect the structural response during an earthquake. Moreover, the computation of capacity and demand of the critical beam indicates exceedance of desired limits, resulting in the early deterioration of the structural elements. Finally, the analytical analysis from the present study confirms that the hanging wall with forward ruptures, pulse-like motions, and fling steps are the most unfavorable combinations for seismic structural damage.

1 January 2018 in Cogent Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JVJayaprakash Vemuri
Jayaprakash Vemuri
SESyed Ehteshamuddin
Syed Ehteshamuddin
SKSubramaniam V. L. Kolluru
Subramaniam V. L. Kolluru
Unreinforced, non-engineered low-strength brick masonry structures comprise a large percentage of buildings in the Himalayan region and have been extensively damaged in recent earthquakes. Due to the high seismic hazard of the region and the inherent vulnerability of non-engineered masonry structures, a seismic assessment of masonry construction in this region is imperative. In this study, a suite of strong ground motions is developed using data from major Himalayan earthquakes. Using a mechanistic-based procedure for predicting the monotonic load envelope which identifies limit states of cracking, strength, and collapse using stress-based criteria, a hysteretic model was calibrated to experimental data of unreinforced masonry shear walls. Nonlinear time history analyses are performed on the validated single degree of freedom models of two unreinforced masonry walls. The analytical results correlate well with observed damage to masonry structures in Himalayan earthquakes. Peak ground acceleration of ground motion is observed to be the key parameter influencing displacement of walls. A linearly increasing trend is observed between the PGA and the observed displacement up to a PGA value of 0.1g. A weak correlation is observed between displacement and ground motion frequency parameters.

22 November 2018 in Geosciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JVJayaprakash Vemuri
Jayaprakash Vemuri
SKSubramaniam Kolluru
Subramaniam Kolluru
SCSumer Chopra
Sumer Chopra
The 2001 Gujarat earthquake was one of the most destructive intraplate earthquakes ever recorded. It had a moment magnitude of M w 7.6 and had a maximum felt intensity of X on the Modified Mercalli Intensity scale. No strong ground motion records are available for this earthquake, barring PGA values recorded on structural response recorders at thirteen sites. In this paper, synthetic ground motions are generated at surface level using the stochastic finite-fault method. Available PGA data from thirteen stations are used to validate the synthetic ground motions. The validated methodology is extended to various sites in Gujarat. Response spectra of synthetic ground motions are compared with the prescribed spectra based on the seismic zonation given in the Indian seismic code of practice. Ground motion characteristics such as peak ground acceleration, peak ground velocity, frequency content, significant duration, and energy content of the ground motions are analyzed. Response spectra of ground motions for towns situated in the highest zone, seismic zone 5, exceeded the prescribed spectral acceleration of 0.9 g for the maximum considered earthquake. The response spectra for towns in seismic zone 5 exhibit peaks in the low period ranges, indicating high vulnerability of low rise structures designed as per the provisions of the Indian seismic code of practice. The response spectra for towns situated in seismic zone 3 were considerably lower than the prescribed maximum spectral acceleration of 0.4 g. The substantial damage reported in towns situated in seismic zone 3 is due to poor construction practices and non-compliance with provisions of seismic design standards.

1 December 2022 in Journal of Safety Science and Resilience
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JVJayaprakash Vemuri
Jayaprakash Vemuri
TATariq Anwar
Tariq Anwar
KSKvl Subramaniam
Kvl Subramaniam