Resolving late failure of dental implant is difficult and costly; however, only few reviews have addressed the risk factors associated with late failure of dental implant. The aim of this literature review was to summarize the influences of different potential risk factors on the incidence of late dental implant failure. The protocol of this systematic review was prepared and implemented based on the PRISMA (Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) guideline. In December 2018, studies published within the previous 10 years on late dental implant failure were selected by fulfilling the eligibility criteria and the risk factors identified in qualified studies were extracted by using a predefined extraction template. Fourteen eligible studies were assessed. The common risk factors for late failure were divided into three groups according to whether they were related to (1) the patient history (radiation therapy, periodontitis, bruxism and early implant failure), (2) clinical parameters (posterior implant location and bone grade 4) or (3) decisions made by the clinician (low initial stability, more than one implant placed during surgery, inflammation at the surgical site during the first year or using an overdenture with conus-type connection). Clinicians should be cautions throughout the treatment process of dental implant—from the initial examination to the treatment planning, surgical operation and prosthesis selection—in order to minimize the risk of late failure of dental implant.

Autologous dentin materials are among the most promising bone substitutes for preventing osseous defects on the distal side of the lower second molar. This study aimed to investigate the effects of autologous demineralized dentin matrix on postoperative complications and wound healing after lower third molar surgery. Thirteen patients with bilateral symmetrical lower third molars participated in this split-mouth randomized clinical trial. After removal surgery, one socket of the lower third molar was grafted with dentin material (demineralized dentin matrix side), and a piece of collagen sponge was used for the tooth socket of the remaining side (control side). The upper third molar on the same lateral side was extracted immediately before lower third molar surgery and used to create a demineralized dentin matrix according to the manufacturer's protocol (KometaBio). After lower third molar surgery, pain, swelling, trismus, and Inflammatory Proliferative Remodeling Scale scores were used to evaluate postoperative complications and wound healing. Pain, swelling, and trismus of the demineralized dentin matrix and control sides were not significantly different at any assessment time (P > 0.05). The wound-healing scores of the demineralized dentin matrix side were better than those of the control side; however, the differences were only significant at 7th and 30th days (P < 0.05). Grafting autologous demineralized dentin matrix into the tooth socket did not increase the postoperative complications after lower third molar surgery. However, wound healing on the graft side was comparatively better than that on the control side. NCT06073639, date 10 October, 2023. This is a retrospectively registered trial.

Background. Prevalence of distal caries in mandibular second molars (M2Ms) and its relationship with impacted condition of the adjacent mandibular third molars (M3Ms) have been reported in some studies. The results, however, were ambiguous because of including all impaction types and using univariate analysis for statistics. Aim. This study aimed to determine anatomical features of mesially/horizontally impacted mandibular third molars (M3Ms) that could predict distal caries in the adjacent mandibular second molars (M2Ms) using multivariable analysis. Materials and Methods. The study sample consisted of 300 digital panoramic radiographs of patients who underwent impacted M3Ms extraction. Two independent researchers collected the following variables from 446 pairs of M2M‐M3M: sex, age, status of distal caries in M2Ms, mesial angulation, and Pell–Gregory classification of M3Ms. Results. The prevalence of distal caries was 50.67%. Multivariable Firth’s logistic regression analysis showed that age (β = 0.066, 95% CI = 0.023–0.113), mesial angulation (70°: β = −0.730, 95% CI = −1.184 to −0.282), vertical position (level B: β = 2.275; 95% CI = 0.015–7.175; level A: β = 3.008; 95% CI = 0.755–7.905), and horizontal position (level II: β = 1.515; 95% CI = 0.444–2.874; level I: β = 1.423; 95% CI = 0.283–2.825) were significant variables after adjusting for sex in the final model for predicting distal caries (p < 0.05). Conclusions. In conclusion, anatomical positions of impacted M3Ms, such as mesial angulation and Pell–Gregory classification were significant predictors of distal caries in M2Ms.

Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) is a promising host-derived scaffold for regenerative endodontic treatment. This study investigated the effects of advanced PRF plus (A-PRF+) and injectable PRF (i-PRF) on the proliferation, migration, and differentiation of stem cells from apical papilla (SCAPs). A-PRF+ and i-PRF were prepared using a DUO Quattro centrifuge following a standard protocol. A-PRF+ and i-PRF extract were diluted in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium and Ham's F-12 medium (DMEM/F12) to produce the experimental culture medium. DMEM/F12 and DMEM/F12 supplemented with 10% foetal bovine serum (FBS) were used as the negative control (NC) and positive control (PC) media, respectively. The proliferative ability of SCAPs was assessed using a counting method (haemocytometer). The migration ability was examined using a scratch-wound assay. Alkaline phosphatase, bone sialoprotein, dentin matrix protein 1, and dentin sialophosphoprotein expression were measured to determine the differentiation ability. The proliferation, migration, and differentiation of SCAPs in the A-PRF+ group were similar to those of the PC group. In the i-PRF group, the cell number was significantly (p < 0.01) lower than that of the A-PRF+ group on days 8 and 10; the percentage of the scratched area on days 1 and 2 was significantly higher than in the A-PRF+ group (p < 0.05). The mRNA expression levels of biomarkers in the i-PRF group were similar to those in the A-PRF+ group. Both A-PRF+ and i-PRF induce SCAPs proliferation, migration, and differentiation. However, A-PRF+ was superior in supporting the proliferation and migration of SCAPs.