Ty Tuff

Dr. Ty Tuff


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
19 February 2016 in Ecology Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KTK. T. Tuff
K. T. Tuff
TTTy Tuff
Ty Tuff
KDK. F. Davies
K. F. Davies
Habitat fragmentation changes thermal conditions in remnant patches, and thermal conditions strongly influence organism morphology, distribution, and activity patterns. However, few studies explore temperature as a mechanism driving ecological responses to fragmentation. Here we offer a conceptual framework that integrates thermal biology into fragmentation research to better understand individual, species, community, and ecosystem‐level responses to fragmentation. Specifically, the framework addresses how fragmentation changes temperature and how the effects of those temperature changes spread through the ecosystem, from organism response via thermal sensitivity, to changes in species distribution and activity patterns, to shifts in community structure following species' responses, and ultimately to changes in ecosystem functions. We place a strong emphasis on future research directions by outlining “Critical gaps” for each step of the framework. Empirical efforts to apply and test this framework promise new understanding of fragmentation's ecological consequences and new strategies for conservation in an increasingly fragmented and warmer world.

3 August 2015 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RHRuth A. Hufbauer
Ruth A. Hufbauer
MSMarianna Szűcs
Marianna Szűcs
EKEmily Kasyon
Emily Kasyon
CYCourtney Youngberg
Courtney Youngberg
MKMichael Koontz
Michael Koontz
BMBrett A. Melbourne
Brett A. Melbourne
Setting aside high-quality large areas of habitat to protect threatened populations is becoming increasingly difficult as humans fragment and degrade the environment. Biologists and managers therefore must determine the best way to shepherd small populations through the dual challenges of reductions in both the number of individuals and genetic variability. By bringing in additional individuals, threatened populations can be increased in size (demographic rescue) or provided with variation to facilitate adaptation and reduce inbreeding (genetic rescue). The relative strengths of demographic and genetic rescue for reducing extinction and increasing growth of threatened populations are untested, and which type of rescue is effective may vary with population size. Using the flour beetle (Tribolium castaneum) in a microcosm experiment, we disentangled the genetic and demographic components of rescue, and compared them with adaptation from standing genetic variation (evolutionary rescue in the strictest sense) using 244 experimental populations founded at either a smaller (50 individuals) or larger (150 individuals) size. Both types of rescue reduced extinction, and those effects were additive. Over the course of six generations, genetic rescue increased population sizes and intrinsic fitness substantially. Both large and small populations showed evidence of being able to adapt from standing genetic variation. Our results support the practice of genetic rescue in facilitating adaptation and reducing inbreeding depression, and suggest that demographic rescue alone may suffice in larger populations even if only moderately inbred individuals are available for addition.

25 October 2024 in Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JBJennifer K. Balch
Jennifer K. Balch
VIVirginia Iglesias
Virginia Iglesias
AMAdam Mahood
Adam Mahood
MCMaxwell Cook
Maxwell Cook
CACibele Amaral
Cibele Amaral
CKCrystal Kolden
Crystal Kolden
The most destructive and deadly wildfires in US history were also fast. Using satellite data, we analyzed the daily growth rates of more than 60,000 fires from 2001 to 2020 across the contiguous US. Nearly half of the ecoregions experienced destructive fast fires that grew more than 1620 hectares in 1 day. These fires accounted for 78% of structures destroyed and 61% of suppression costs ($18.9 billion). From 2001 to 2020, the average peak daily growth rate for these fires more than doubled (+249% relative to 2001) in the Western US. Nearly 3 million structures were within 4 kilometers of a fast fire during this period across the US. Given recent devastating wildfires, understanding fast fires is crucial for improving firefighting strategies and community preparedness.

7 October 2014 in Proceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MSMarianna Szűcs
Marianna Szűcs
BMBrett A. Melbourne
Brett A. Melbourne
TTTy Tuff
Ty Tuff
RHRuth A. Hufbauer
Ruth A. Hufbauer
Colonization success increases with the size of the founding group. Both demographic and genetic factors underlie this relationship, yet because genetic diversity normally increases with numbers of individuals, their relative importance remains unclear. Furthermore, their influence may depend on the environment and may change as colonization progresses from establishment through population growth and then dispersal. We tested the roles of genetics, demography and environment in the founding ofTribolium castaneumpopulations. Using three genetic backgrounds (inbred to outbred), we released individuals of four founding sizes (2–32) into two environments (natal and novel), and measured establishment success, initial population growth and dispersal. Establishment increased with founding size, whereas population growth was shaped by founding size, genetic background and environment. Population growth was depressed by inbreeding at small founding sizes, but growth rates were similar across genetic backgrounds at large founding size, an interaction indicating that the magnitude of the genetic effects depends upon founding population size. Dispersal rates increased with genetic diversity. These results suggest that numbers of individuals may drive initial establishment, but that subsequent population growth and spread, even in the first generation of colonization, can be driven by genetic processes, including both reduced growth owing to inbreeding depression, and increased dispersal with increased genetic diversity.

1 February 2017 in Ecology Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MSMarianna Szűcs
Marianna Szűcs
BMBrett A. Melbourne
Brett A. Melbourne
TTTy Tuff
Ty Tuff
CWChristopher Weiss‐Lehman
Christopher Weiss‐Lehman
RHRuth A. Hufbauer
Ruth A. Hufbauer

27 July 2010 in Polar Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KDKendi F. Davies
Kendi F. Davies
BMBrett A. Melbourne
Brett A. Melbourne
JMJeffrey L. McClenahan
Jeffrey L. McClenahan
TTTy Tuff
Ty Tuff