Porcine coronaviruses and reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) are responsible for severe outbreaks that cause huge economic losses worldwide. In Italy, three coronaviruses have been reported historically: porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV), transmissible gastroenteritis virus (TGEV) and porcine respiratory coronavirus (PRCV). Although repeated outbreaks have been described, especially in northern Italy, where intensive pig farming is common, there is a worrying lack of information on the spread of these pathogens in Europe. In this work, we determined the seroprevalence of three porcine coronaviruses and PRRSV in the Campania region, southern Italy. A total of 443 samples were tested for the presence of antibodies against porcine coronaviruses and PRRSV using four different commercial ELISAs. Our results indicated that PEDV is the most prevalent among porcine coronaviruses, followed by TGEV, and finally PRCV. PRRSV appeared to be the most prevalent virus (16.7%). For coronaviruses, seroprevalence was higher in pigs raised in intensive farming systems. In terms of distribution, TGEV is more widespread in the province of Avellino, while PEDV and PRRSV are more prevalent in the province of Naples, emphasizing the epidemic nature of both infections. Interestingly, TGEV-positive animals are more common among growers, while seropositivity for PEDV and PRRSV was higher in adults. Our research provides new insights into the spread of swine coronaviruses and PRRSV in southern Italy, as well as a warning about the need for viral surveillance.

Background: Brucella canis is an emerging zoonotic pathogen responsible for canine reproductive disorders and public health concerns. This study assessed the seroprevalence of B. canis in dogs from Campania, Southern Italy (2022–2025). Methods: Serum samples (n = 400) were retrospectively screened using an indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFAT), performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Screening was conducted at a 1:40 cut-off, followed by serial dilutions to determine endpoint titres. Statistical analysis included chi-square tests for univariable screening, followed by nominal logistic regression models to evaluate the association between IFAT positivity and predictive factors (year, province, and sex of dogs). Additionally, a general linear model (GLM) was applied to the seropositive subset (n = 69) to analyse the magnitude of the antibody response, expressed as geometric mean titres (GMTs). Results: The overall seroprevalence was 17.3% (95% CI: 13.6–21.0%). Dog’s sex, year of sampling, and province were not significant independent predictors of infection (p > 0.05), but GLM analysis showed that sampling year (p = 0.0024) and province (p = 0.0490) significantly influenced antibody intensity. A significant temporal increase in antibody intensity was observed towards 2025 (p = 0.037), suggesting an intensification of infection pressure. Conclusions: Our results confirm that Brucella canis is an endemic pathogen in the shelter dog population of southern Italy. The high seroprevalence and significant increase in antibody magnitude (GMT) over the study period indicate rising infection pressure, highlighting the urgent need for mandatory screening and a coordinated One Health surveillance strategy to manage zoonotic risk effectively.