Treatment of malignant diseases using oncolytic viruses (OVs) is currently considered a promising therapeutic approach. Initial encouraging results fueled a large number of clinical trials, showcasing favorable safety profiles of OVs—but therapeutic outcomes remain far from perfect. The efficacy of systemically administered OVs is limited due to rapid immune clearance and suboptimal biodistribution, while locally administered OVs encounter an additional barrier of poor bioavailability. Cell-based carriers that can shield viral particles and provide tumor-targeted OV delivery, represent one of the potential ways to address these challenges. The feasibility of this approach was demonstrated using a broad range of cell types, including mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), neural stem cells (NSCs), different subsets of immune cells, and cancer cell lines. The resulting spectrum of carriers can be viewed as a multifaceted tool, taking into account the specific properties, advantages, and limitations of each cell carrier type discussed in this review. Careful consideration of these features will provide the basis for successful development of cell-based OV delivery platforms.

Treatment of the malignant diseases using oncolytic viruses (OVs) is currently considered as a promising therapeutic approach. Initial encouraging results fueled a large number of clinical trials, showcasing favorable safety profiles of OVs - but therapeutic outcomes remain far from perfect. Efficacy of systemically administered OVs is limited due to poor bioavailability, rapid immune clearance, and suboptimal biodistribution. Cell-based carriers that can shield viral particles and provide tumor-targeted OV delivery, represent one of the potential ways to address these challenges. Feasibility of this approach was demonstrated using a broad range of cell types, including mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), neural stem cells (NSCs), different subsets of immune cells and cancer cell lines. The resulting spectrum of carriers can be viewed as a multifaceted tool, taking into account the specific properties, advantages, and limitations of each cell carrier type discussed in this review. Careful consideration of these features will provide the basis for successful development of cell-based OV delivery platforms.

Cancer remains the leading cause of death in domestic dogs. Conventional therapeutic approaches, including surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy, frequently fail to achieve sustained remission or stabilization. Oncolytic virotherapy, a rapidly advancing therapeutic modality in human oncology, is emerging as a novel strategy in veterinary medicine. This systematic review summarizes current knowledge on the application of oncolytic viruses (OVs) in canine cancer treatment, focusing on their mechanisms of action, safety profiles, and clinical efficacy. We evaluate diverse OV platforms, including myxoma virus, reovirus, vesicular stomatitis virus, canine adenoviruses, vaccinia virus, Sendai virus, and Newcastle disease virus, across preclinical and clinical studies in dogs with various malignancies. While several OVs have demonstrated favorable tolerability and modest antitumor activity, key challenges such as pre-existing immunity, optimization of dosing regimens, and rational combination strategies remain to be addressed. This review emphasizes the translational significance of canine studies for both veterinary and human oncology, underscoring the critical need for rigorously designed clinical trials to refine virotherapy protocols and expand therapeutic options for canine cancer patients.

Cancer remains the leading cause of death in domestic dogs. Conventional therapeutic approaches, including surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy frequently fail to achieve sustained remission or stabilization. Oncolytic virotherapy, a rapidly advancing therapeutic modality in human oncology, is emerging as a novel strategy in veterinary medicine. This systematic review summarizes current knowledge on the application of oncolytic viruses (OVs) in canine cancer treatment, focusing on their mechanisms of action, safety profiles, and clinical efficacy. We evaluate diverse OV platforms, including myxoma virus, reovirus, vesicular stomatitis virus, canine adenoviruses, vaccinia virus, Sendai virus, and Newcastle disease virus, across preclinical and clinical studies in dogs with various malignancies. While several OVs have demonstrated favorable tolerability and modest antitumor activity, key challenges such as pre-existing immunity, optimization of dosing regimens, and rational combination strategies, remain to be addressed. This review emphasizes the translational significance of canine studies for both veterinary and human oncology, underscoring the critical need for rigorously designed clinical trials to refine virotherapy protocols and expand therapeutic options for canine cancer patients.