Background: Parkinson’s disease (PD) is the second most common progressive neurodegenerative disease. In the advanced stages, the continuous delivery of levodopa (LD) as levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) has demonstrated significant improvement of motor and nonmotor complications and improvement of the patients’ quality of life (QoL). Despite the growing global experience with this treatment, anumber of unsolved practical issues remain, and currently, the data on the reasons that can lead to the discontinuation of LCIG are scarce. Objective: In the present study, we aimed to analyze the causes that led to the discontinuation of LCIG therapy. Methods: In this retrospective study, after 10 years of experience with LCIG as a therapeutic option in advanced PD, we analyzed the data of all dropout cases among the 204 patients that initiated LCIG therapy in two Romanian centers. Results: Of the 204 patients enrolled, 43 patients dropped out. Disease duration until LCIG infusion was significantly longer (11.67± 4.98 vs 9.44± 3.44) and the overall clinical picture more sever (both regarding motor symptoms and cognitive decline) in dropout patients (compared to patients who continued treatment). The dropout patients also presented significant differences regarding the incidence of polyneuropathy (32.5% vs 11.18%). The main cause of discontinuation was death. Conclusion: The causes of discontinuation from LCIG therapy in Romanian patients are similar to those from other centers; however, the rate of dropouts is somewhat lower. The clinician’s experience in selecting and treating the patients in advanced stages of PD can increase therapeutic adherence. Also, the presence of a well-trained caregiver along with the availability of a proper aftercare system is mandatory for maintaining the long-term benefits of the therapy and the overall best outcome possible. Targeted prospective studies are needed to confirm whether a more severe stage of the disease and cognitive impairment at the time of initiation, respectively, the association of polyneuropathy can be considered as predictive factors for dropout.

Levodopa–entacapone–carbidopa intestinal gel infusion is a relatively new treatment option for advanced Parkinson’s disease. We aimed to describe and analyze the characteristics of de novo levodopa–entacapone–carbidopa intestinal gel therapy in 20 consecutive patients with advanced Parkinson’s disease. We assessed the profile of motor complications by evaluating the following: motor fluctuations, dyskinesias, and the freezing phenomenon at baseline (before the testing period) and before discharge. The treatment significantly reduced the duration of daily hours spent in off time compared with baseline pre-treatment values from a mean of 4.8 ± 0.9 h/day to a mean of 1.4 ± 0.5 h per day (p < 0.001). The duration and severity of peak-dose dyskinesia were also significantly reduced compared with baseline values. Out of the 10 patients who reported freezing, 8 did not present this complication at the pre-discharge assessment. Significant improvements were observed in Hoehn and Yahr scale scores in both the on and off states. The levodopa–entacapone–carbidopa intestinal gel therapy was well tolerated during the follow-up period immediately after initiation. Despite a relatively severe stage of the disease, all patients experienced a significant improvement in motor fluctuations, dyskinesias, and the freezing phenomenon.

Background: In the advanced stages of Parkinson’s disease (APD), complex forms of dyskinesia may severely impair the patient’s quality of life. Objective: In the present study, we aimed to analyze the evolution under LCIG therapy of the most important motor fluctuations and complex disabling dyskinesias, including diphasic dyskinesia. Methods: In this retrospective study, we analyzed the characteristics of patients with APD who had at least 30 min of diphasic dyskinesia (DID) in 3 consecutive days, were considered responders and were treated with LCIG in our clinic. Patients were evaluated before and after PEG and at 6, 12 and 18 months, when the changes in the therapy were recorded, and they completed a 7-point Global Patient Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) scale. Results: Forty patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria—out of which, 34 performed all visits. There was a substantial difference between the calculated and real LCIG (1232 ± 337 mg vs. 1823 ± 728 mg). The motor fluctuations and most dyskinesias improved significantly after starting LCIG, but an increasing number of patients needed longer daily administrations of LCIG (24 instead of 16 h). Conclusions: Patients with APD with complex dyskinesias must be tested in dedicated hospitals, and they need a special therapeutic approach. The properly adapted LCIG treatment regarding the dose and time of administration completed with well-selected add-on medication should offer improvement for patients who want to or can only choose this DAT vs. others.

Advanced Parkinson’s disease (APD) cannot be treated efficiently using the classical medications however, in recent decades invasive therapeutical methods were implemented and confirmed as effective. One of these methods makes it possible to continue the levodopa (LD) supplementation as a gel administered directly into the upper intestine. However, there are a number of unanswered questions regarding this method. Therefore, we retrospectively analyzed a 10-year period of selected patients that were treated with levodopa/carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG). We included all APD patients with motor fluctuations and dyskinesia at presentation. LCIG treatment was started in 150 patients: on average these patients received LD for 10.6 ± 4.4 years with a frequency of 5.2 ± 1.0/day until the introduction of LCIG. The estimated and the real LCIG dose differed significantly (mean: 1309 ± 321 mg vs. 1877 ± 769 mg). The mean duration of LCIG administration was 19.8 ± 3.6 h, but in a number of 62 patients we had to administer it for 24 h, to maximize the therapeutic benefit. A carefully and individually adjusted LCIG treatment improves the quality of life of APD patients, but questions remain unresolved even after treating a large number of patients. It is important to share the ideas and observations based on the real-life experience related to the optimal timing, the appropriate dose and duration of administration of the LCIG.

Background/Objectives: Advanced Parkinson’s disease is characterized by severe motor fluctuations and disabling dyskinesias that often become refractory to conventional oral dopaminergic therapies. Methods: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of levodopa–entacapone–carbidopa intestinal gel (LECIG) in 50 patients initiated during a four-year period at a tertiary movement disorders center. Motor outcomes were analyzed using Wilcoxon signed-rank and McNemar’s tests, while multivariable logistic regression was employed to identify predictors of improvement. Results: LECIG initiation significantly reduced mean daily OFF time from 4.63 ± 0.75 to 1.62 ± 1.97 h (p < 0.0001) and total dyskinesia duration by 65% (p < 0.0001). Furthermore, the prevalence of early morning akinesia decreased from 80% to 26%, and delayed ON phenomena were completely eliminated (p < 0.0001). Subgroup analyses indicated that patients with troublesome dyskinesia (≥1 h/day) achieved significantly greater reductions in involuntary movements compared to those with lower baseline dyskinesia levels (p = 0.013). Conclusions: These findings suggest that LECIG provides a meaningful and sustained stabilization of motor complications, highlighting its role as a valuable device-aided therapy in managing advanced Parkinson’s disease.

Background/Objectives: Obesity is increasingly recognised as a clinically relevant comorbidity in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), with potential effects on inflammatory burden, treatment response, surgical risk, nutritional status, and quality of life. Endoscopic bariatric therapies (EBTs), including intragastric balloons and endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty, offer minimally invasive weight-loss options between pharmacotherapy and bariatric surgery. However, their role in IBD remains poorly defined. This narrative review examines patient selection, nutritional risk, periprocedural management, and future research priorities for EBTs in IBD. Methods: A narrative review was performed, focusing on obesity in IBD, bariatric endoscopy, bariatric surgery, nutritional deficiencies, sarcopenic obesity, biologic therapy, and periprocedural risk. Evidence from general bariatric endoscopy studies, IBD-specific obesity literature, clinical guidelines, and expert consensus documents was synthesised. Results: Direct evidence evaluating EBTs in patients with IBD is very limited. Most practical considerations must therefore be extrapolated from general bariatric endoscopy studies and bariatric surgery data in IBD. Patients with sustained clinical and preferably endoscopic remission, stable nutritional status, and uncomplicated disease phenotypes may represent the most suitable candidates. Active upper gastrointestinal Crohn’s disease, stricturing or penetrating disease, recent surgery, severe malnutrition, sarcopenia, and high-dose corticosteroid exposure should prompt caution or avoidance. Structured follow-up is needed to monitor nutritional deficiencies, body composition, procedural symptoms, and possible IBD activity. Conclusions: EBTs may represent a promising option for selected patients with IBD and obesity, but current evidence remains insufficient for firm recommendations. Prospective registries, phenotype-stratified cohort studies, and comparative trials are needed.